China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010
100.00
+19.15 from 2009
China's real effective exchange rate was 100.00 in 2010, increased +19.15 from 101.11 in 2009. This was the 24th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2010▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Serbia | 87.72 | -7.8% |
| 2nd | Thailand | 91.38 | 5.5% |
| 3rd | Estonia | 92.89 | -2.8% |
| 4th | United Arab Emirates | 93.52 | -4.5% |
| 5th | Lithuania | 93.69 | -4.2% |
| 6th | Peru | 94.58 | 2.1% |
| 7th | India | 98.74 | 11.7% |
| 8th | Armenia | 100.00 | 0.8% |
| 9th | Antigua and Barbuda | 100.00 | 0.2% |
| 10th | Australia | 100.00 | -3.9% |
| 11th | Austria | 100.00 | 1.0% |
| 12th | Burundi | 100.00 | 3.3% |
| 13th | Belgium | 100.00 | -1.1% |
| 14th | Bulgaria | 100.00 | 3.2% |
| 15th | Bahrain | 100.00 | -2.4% |
| 16th | Bahamas, The | 100.00 | -1.1% |
| 17th | Belize | 100.00 | -2.5% |
| 18th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 100.00 | -5.6% |
| 19th | Brazil | 100.00 | -31.7% |
| 20th | Central African Republic | 100.00 | -6.2% |
| 21st | Canada | 100.00 | -11.9% |
| 22nd | Switzerland | 100.00 | 12.7% |
| 23rd | Chile | 100.00 | -10.5% |
| 24th | China | 100.00 | 23.7% |
| 25th | Côte d'Ivoire | 100.00 | -6.9% |
| 26th | Cameroon | 100.00 | -6.1% |
| 27th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 100.00 | 3.9% |
| 28th | Colombia | 100.00 | -19.9% |
| 29th | Costa Rica | 100.00 | 10.8% |
| 30th | Cyprus | 100.00 | -12.3% |
| 31st | Czechia | 100.00 | -0.4% |
| 32nd | Germany | 100.00 | -8.2% |
| 33rd | Dominica | 100.00 | -1.3% |
| 34th | Denmark | 100.00 | -5.1% |
| 35th | Dominican Republic | 100.00 | 0.4% |
| 36th | Algeria | 100.00 | -8.7% |
| 37th | Spain | 100.00 | -6.3% |
| 38th | Finland | 100.00 | -7.0% |
| 39th | Fiji | 100.00 | -4.7% |
| 40th | France | 100.00 | -8.8% |
| 41st | Gabon | 100.00 | -6.1% |
| 42nd | United Kingdom | 100.00 | 0.1% |
| 43rd | Georgia | 100.00 | -4.4% |
| 44th | Ghana | 100.00 | 5.5% |
| 45th | Gambia, The | 100.00 | -2.7% |
| 46th | Equatorial Guinea | 100.00 | -0.5% |
| 47th | Greece | 100.00 | -12.5% |
| 48th | Grenada | 100.00 | -0.6% |
| 49th | Guyana | 100.00 | -0.1% |
| 50th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 100.00 | 18.5% |
| 51st | Croatia | 100.00 | -8.5% |
| 52nd | Hungary | 100.00 | -14.1% |
| 53rd | Ireland | 100.00 | -17.6% |
| 54th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 100.00 | 1.0% |
| 55th | Iceland | 100.00 | 27.8% |
| 56th | Israel | 100.00 | 17.8% |
| 57th | Italy | 100.00 | -8.6% |
| 58th | Japan | 100.00 | -21.9% |
| 59th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 100.00 | -1.7% |
| 60th | Korea | 100.00 | 15.0% |
| 61st | St. Lucia | 100.00 | 0.1% |
| 62nd | Lesotho | 100.00 | 4.7% |
| 63rd | Luxembourg | 100.00 | -0.8% |
| 64th | Latvia | 100.00 | -2.4% |
| 65th | Morocco | 100.00 | -3.2% |
| 66th | Moldova | 100.00 | -6.3% |
| 67th | Mexico | 100.00 | -16.6% |
| 68th | North Macedonia | 100.00 | -3.1% |
| 69th | Malta | 100.00 | -9.1% |
| 70th | Malawi | 100.00 | -6.7% |
| 71st | Malaysia | 100.00 | -10.1% |
| 72nd | Nigeria | 100.00 | 7.9% |
| 73rd | Nicaragua | 100.00 | -6.5% |
| 74th | Netherlands | 100.00 | -3.7% |
| 75th | Norway | 100.00 | -18.4% |
| 76th | New Zealand | 100.00 | 8.5% |
| 77th | Pakistan | 100.00 | 3.6% |
| 78th | Philippines | 100.00 | 17.9% |
| 79th | Papua New Guinea | 100.00 | -2.5% |
| 80th | Poland | 100.00 | -3.1% |
| 81st | Portugal | 100.00 | -4.4% |
| 82nd | Paraguay | 100.00 | 0.8% |
| 83rd | Romania | 100.00 | -0.6% |
| 84th | Russian Federation | 100.00 | -15.7% |
| 85th | Saudi Arabia | 100.00 | 17.3% |
| 86th | Singapore | 100.00 | 8.7% |
| 87th | Solomon Islands | 100.00 | -7.3% |
| 88th | Sierra Leone | 100.00 | -3.5% |
| 89th | Slovak Republic | 100.00 | -2.5% |
| 90th | Sweden | 100.00 | -6.7% |
| 91st | Togo | 100.00 | -5.1% |
| 92nd | Trinidad and Tobago | 100.00 | 5.5% |
| 93rd | Tunisia | 100.00 | -2.5% |
| 94th | Uganda | 100.00 | -7.7% |
| 95th | Ukraine | 100.00 | 2.1% |
| 96th | Uruguay | 100.00 | 11.0% |
| 97th | United States | 100.00 | 13.3% |
| 98th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.00 | -2.5% |
| 99th | Samoa | 100.00 | 0.0% |
| 100th | South Africa | 100.00 | -19.1% |
| 101st | Zambia | 100.00 | 4.6% |
| 102nd | Slovenia | 102.44 | -2.2% |
| 103rd | Indonesia | 110.52 | 12.9% |
| 104th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 111.40 | -1.1% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 179.72 | 10.2% |
| 106th | Argentina | 180.44 | -3.4% |
FAQ
What was China's real effective exchange rate in 2010?▾
China's real effective exchange rate in 2010 was 100.00. This ranked 24th globally.
How did China's real effective exchange rate change in 2010?▾
China's real effective exchange rate increased by 23.7% in 2010 compared to 2009.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2010?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2010 at 180.44.
What is the real effective exchange rate of China in 2010?▾
The real effective exchange rate of China in 2010 was 100.00. This ranked 24th globally.
How does 2010 compare to 2009 for China's real effective exchange rate?▾
China's real effective exchange rate went from 101.11 in 2009 to 100.00 in 2010, a 23.7% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2010. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 7.9%. View full analysis →
Related
2009
2011
All years
Full ranking 2010
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1980
Lowest: 1994
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Malaysia
vs Mexico
vs Nauru
vs Argentina
G20 Real Effective Exchange Rate
BRICS+ Real Effective Exchange Rate
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Real Effective Exchange Rate
Global Ranking