Montenegro - Energy Use per Capita 2022
Montenegro's energy use per capita was 1,674 in 2022, decreased +56 from 1,731 in 2021. This was the 81st highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Yemen, Republic of | 69 | -3.4% |
| 2nd | South Sudan | 69 | -5.0% |
| 3rd | Niger | 162 | 6.8% |
| 4th | Chad | 199 | 1.4% |
| 5th | Eritrea | 290 | 0.9% |
| 6th | Bangladesh | 297 | 1.6% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 309 | -0.1% |
| 8th | Burkina Faso | 313 | 3.2% |
| 9th | Senegal | 316 | 7.4% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 333 | -0.4% |
| 11th | Mozambique | 359 | 1.6% |
| 12th | Ghana | 359 | -0.8% |
| 13th | Rwanda | 373 | 2.0% |
| 14th | Tajikistan | 375 | 2.0% |
| 15th | Benin | 376 | -0.1% |
| 16th | Haiti | 378 | -7.0% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 384 | -0.3% |
| 18th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 391 | -0.8% |
| 19th | Myanmar | 400 | -1.2% |
| 20th | Tanzania | 405 | 0.2% |
| 21st | Sudan | 412 | -3.4% |
| 22nd | Zimbabwe | 417 | 2.7% |
| 23rd | Angola | 423 | 1.1% |
| 24th | Togo | 425 | 0.7% |
| 25th | Syrian Arab Republic | 455 | -7.6% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 471 | 1.2% |
| 27th | Côte d'Ivoire | 472 | 0.7% |
| 28th | Sri Lanka | 474 | -10.1% |
| 29th | Uganda | 483 | -0.1% |
| 30th | Cambodia | 502 | 0.1% |
| 31st | Nepal | 520 | -0.8% |
| 32nd | Kenya | 541 | 0.2% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 551 | 3.7% |
| 34th | Honduras | 573 | 0.6% |
| 35th | Morocco | 603 | -2.1% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 608 | 1.2% |
| 37th | Lebanon | 617 | -36.5% |
| 38th | Congo, Republic of | 628 | 6.7% |
| 39th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 641 | 3.4% |
| 40th | Kyrgyz Republic | 645 | 8.3% |
| 41st | Namibia | 692 | 1.7% |
| 42nd | India | 728 | 7.5% |
| 43rd | Jordan | 754 | 4.0% |
| 44th | El Salvador | 769 | 6.4% |
| 45th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 798 | 5.3% |
| 46th | Zambia | 801 | 4.0% |
| 47th | Lao PDR | 815 | 12.1% |
| 48th | Cuba | 816 | 0.1% |
| 49th | Peru | 827 | 6.7% |
| 50th | Colombia | 851 | -2.5% |
| 51st | Albania | 885 | -3.3% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 888 | -3.9% |
| 53rd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 902 | 5.2% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 905 | 2.1% |
| 55th | Dominican Republic | 950 | 1.2% |
| 56th | Indonesia | 954 | 6.3% |
| 57th | Tunisia | 956 | -0.9% |
| 58th | Eswatini | 959 | 0.8% |
| 59th | Jamaica | 969 | 10.0% |
| 60th | Costa Rica | 1,009 | 1.3% |
| 61st | Viet Nam | 1,023 | 6.3% |
| 62nd | Paraguay | 1,045 | -4.5% |
| 63rd | Panama | 1,063 | 2.8% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,096 | 2.2% |
| 65th | Botswana | 1,165 | 1.9% |
| 66th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,284 | -1.3% |
| 67th | Armenia | 1,348 | 6.0% |
| 68th | Uzbekistan | 1,382 | -5.7% |
| 69th | Iraq | 1,412 | 10.7% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,423 | -11.7% |
| 71st | Brazil | 1,433 | 0.2% |
| 72nd | Malta | 1,456 | 6.8% |
| 73rd | North Macedonia | 1,476 | 1.4% |
| 74th | Ukraine | 1,479 | -29.4% |
| 75th | Algeria | 1,500 | 3.3% |
| 76th | Mexico | 1,526 | 7.6% |
| 77th | Georgia | 1,544 | 8.2% |
| 78th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,566 | -6.3% |
| 79th | Uruguay | 1,626 | -1.1% |
| 80th | Romania | 1,655 | -7.4% |
| 81st | Montenegro | 1,674 | -3.3% |
| 82nd | Cyprus | 1,683 | 1.0% |
| 83rd | Azerbaijan | 1,714 | 5.6% |
| 84th | Suriname | 1,739 | 2.3% |
| 85th | Argentina | 1,809 | 3.9% |
| 86th | Türkiye | 1,842 | -2.8% |
| 87th | Thailand | 1,867 | 1.1% |
| 88th | Mongolia | 1,891 | -1.7% |
| 89th | South Africa | 1,938 | -8.8% |
| 90th | Portugal | 1,950 | 0.3% |
| 91st | Greece | 1,958 | 1.8% |
| 92nd | Gabon | 2,096 | -0.2% |
| 93rd | Chile | 2,125 | 4.5% |
| 94th | Croatia | 2,155 | -2.6% |
| 95th | United Kingdom | 2,254 | -5.2% |
| 96th | Latvia | 2,256 | -5.0% |
| 97th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2,271 | 0.2% |
| 98th | Spain | 2,409 | -0.6% |
| 99th | Italy | 2,412 | -4.7% |
| 100th | Serbia | 2,441 | 3.6% |
| 101st | Lithuania | 2,454 | -11.5% |
| 102nd | Israel | 2,501 | 2.8% |
| 103rd | Libya | 2,539 | 7.2% |
| 104th | Denmark | 2,581 | -6.4% |
| 105th | Switzerland | 2,592 | -1.1% |
| 106th | Ireland | 2,600 | -3.3% |
| 107th | Hungary | 2,673 | -6.2% |
| 108th | China | 2,676 | 2.0% |
| 109th | Poland | 2,798 | -4.2% |
| 110th | Belarus | 2,862 | -2.3% |
| 111th | Malaysia | 2,867 | 2.6% |
| 112th | European Union | 2,923 | -6.0% |
| 113th | Bulgaria | 2,969 | 1.7% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,046 | -3.1% |
| 115th | Slovak Republic | 3,089 | -6.6% |
| 116th | France | 3,100 | -10.7% |
| 117th | Japan | 3,130 | -2.1% |
| 118th | Germany | 3,262 | -5.9% |
| 119th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3,266 | -2.1% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,487 | -6.5% |
| 121st | Kazakhstan | 3,507 | -1.0% |
| 122nd | Estonia | 3,559 | 3.8% |
| 123rd | Netherlands | 3,570 | -12.0% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 3,765 | -3.7% |
| 125th | Czechia | 3,896 | -4.0% |
| 126th | Sweden | 4,324 | -5.2% |
| 127th | Belgium | 4,368 | -9.4% |
| 128th | Norway | 4,651 | -12.2% |
| 129th | Luxembourg | 4,863 | -13.6% |
| 130th | Australia | 4,942 | -1.3% |
| 131st | Korea | 5,412 | -1.8% |
| 132nd | Russian Federation | 5,601 | -1.4% |
| 133rd | Turkmenistan | 5,626 | 9.7% |
| 134th | Curaçao | 5,650 | 3.8% |
| 135th | Finland | 5,684 | -5.2% |
| 136th | Singapore | 5,785 | -3.0% |
| 137th | Oman | 5,867 | -1.1% |
| 138th | United States | 6,512 | 1.0% |
| 139th | Gibraltar | 6,522 | -3.0% |
| 140th | Saudi Arabia | 7,530 | 0.9% |
| 141st | Canada | 7,578 | 0.7% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,336 | -3.9% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 9,130 | 6.5% |
| 144th | Brunei Darussalam | 9,537 | 6.4% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 10,702 | 0.3% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 11,038 | -1.6% |
| 147th | Iceland | 15,807 | 0.2% |
| 148th | Qatar | 16,684 | -2.4% |
FAQ
Montenegro's energy use per capita in 2022 was 1,674. This ranked 81st globally.
Montenegro's energy use per capita decreased by 3.3% in 2022 compared to 2021.
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2022 at 16,684.
The energy use per capita of Montenegro in 2022 was 1,674. This ranked 81st globally.
Montenegro's energy use per capita went from 1,731 in 2021 to 1,674 in 2022, a 3.3% decrease.
Montenegro matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2022. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 3.3%. View full analysis →