Serbia - Energy Use per Capita 1999
1,658
−616 from 1998
Serbia's energy use per capita was 1,658 in 1999, decreased +616 from 2,274 in 1998. This was the 83rd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1999▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Burkina Faso | 120 | -25.3% |
| 2nd | Bangladesh | 135 | 1.9% |
| 3rd | Niger | 203 | -1.3% |
| 4th | Senegal | 232 | 3.0% |
| 5th | Yemen, Republic of | 235 | 9.4% |
| 6th | Congo, Republic of | 236 | -4.2% |
| 7th | Chad | 248 | -3.0% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 256 | 1.6% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 271 | 1.2% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 272 | 1.0% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 278 | -0.9% |
| 12th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 284 | -3.0% |
| 13th | Equatorial Guinea | 298 | 3.1% |
| 14th | Eritrea | 317 | 2.2% |
| 15th | Nepal | 318 | 3.6% |
| 16th | Benin | 328 | 1.1% |
| 17th | Haiti | 355 | 0.5% |
| 18th | Viet Nam | 358 | 1.6% |
| 19th | Tajikistan | 361 | -1.1% |
| 20th | Tanzania | 383 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Mozambique | 384 | 0.1% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 390 | -1.5% |
| 23rd | Morocco | 391 | 4.8% |
| 24th | India | 393 | 3.9% |
| 25th | Sri Lanka | 399 | 4.8% |
| 26th | Ghana | 401 | 1.4% |
| 27th | Côte d'Ivoire | 408 | 15.4% |
| 28th | Pakistan | 411 | 2.9% |
| 29th | Cameroon | 419 | -1.9% |
| 30th | Togo | 423 | 11.1% |
| 31st | Angola | 434 | 1.0% |
| 32nd | Kenya | 456 | -0.6% |
| 33rd | Honduras | 470 | -11.8% |
| 34th | Philippines | 483 | 0.0% |
| 35th | Nicaragua | 495 | -0.1% |
| 36th | Kyrgyz Republic | 498 | -13.9% |
| 37th | Peru | 513 | 3.5% |
| 38th | Rwanda | 514 | 3.8% |
| 39th | Sudan | 518 | 8.2% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 537 | -3.8% |
| 41st | Albania | 577 | 35.2% |
| 42nd | Armenia | 579 | -2.1% |
| 43rd | Namibia | 583 | -3.2% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 587 | 3.4% |
| 45th | Guatemala | 601 | 7.5% |
| 46th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 614 | -0.2% |
| 47th | Zambia | 629 | -2.0% |
| 48th | Ecuador | 638 | -11.6% |
| 49th | El Salvador | 641 | 3.2% |
| 50th | Georgia | 669 | -6.5% |
| 51st | Colombia | 676 | -11.6% |
| 52nd | Costa Rica | 681 | 8.0% |
| 53rd | Tunisia | 730 | 2.1% |
| 54th | Mauritius | 776 | 3.4% |
| 55th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 783 | 6.3% |
| 56th | Dominican Republic | 798 | 2.1% |
| 57th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 802 | -2.0% |
| 58th | Paraguay | 824 | -6.3% |
| 59th | Panama | 854 | -3.4% |
| 60th | Algeria | 872 | 5.3% |
| 61st | China | 881 | 1.0% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 881 | -2.4% |
| 63rd | Zimbabwe | 899 | 4.9% |
| 64th | Mongolia | 932 | -1.3% |
| 65th | Syrian Arab Republic | 949 | -2.9% |
| 66th | Iraq | 959 | -24.7% |
| 67th | Eswatini | 968 | 1.6% |
| 68th | Uruguay | 995 | 8.7% |
| 69th | Botswana | 1,052 | 1.1% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,063 | -12.7% |
| 71st | Cuba | 1,073 | 3.7% |
| 72nd | Türkiye | 1,080 | -2.8% |
| 73rd | Brazil | 1,091 | 0.8% |
| 74th | Thailand | 1,139 | 5.5% |
| 75th | Gabon | 1,178 | -5.1% |
| 76th | Lebanon | 1,273 | 2.8% |
| 77th | Jamaica | 1,309 | 1.7% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,344 | -6.6% |
| 79th | Azerbaijan | 1,369 | -7.8% |
| 80th | Mexico | 1,556 | 1.3% |
| 81st | Romania | 1,614 | -11.6% |
| 82nd | Chile | 1,634 | 4.9% |
| 83rd | Serbia | 1,658 | -27.1% |
| 84th | Latvia | 1,664 | -7.4% |
| 85th | Argentina | 1,667 | 1.1% |
| 86th | Uzbekistan | 1,839 | 2.7% |
| 87th | Malaysia | 1,883 | -1.0% |
| 88th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,929 | 11.8% |
| 89th | Croatia | 1,935 | 4.0% |
| 90th | Malta | 1,943 | 8.4% |
| 91st | Cyprus | 2,142 | -1.3% |
| 92nd | Bulgaria | 2,231 | -8.5% |
| 93rd | Lithuania | 2,262 | -14.2% |
| 94th | Kazakhstan | 2,324 | -7.5% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,366 | -2.8% |
| 96th | Portugal | 2,390 | 6.7% |
| 97th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,392 | 19.2% |
| 98th | Greece | 2,393 | 0.0% |
| 99th | Poland | 2,397 | -2.6% |
| 100th | Belarus | 2,420 | -2.2% |
| 101st | Hungary | 2,491 | -0.5% |
| 102nd | Ukraine | 2,703 | 0.3% |
| 103rd | Israel | 2,738 | -5.1% |
| 104th | Libya | 2,855 | -3.8% |
| 105th | Spain | 2,878 | 4.4% |
| 106th | Italy | 2,958 | 1.5% |
| 107th | Oman | 3,126 | 2.8% |
| 108th | Slovenia | 3,242 | -0.3% |
| 109th | Slovak Republic | 3,272 | 0.5% |
| 110th | Turkmenistan | 3,302 | 16.3% |
| 111th | European Union | 3,409 | -1.2% |
| 112th | Switzerland | 3,533 | -0.3% |
| 113th | Estonia | 3,543 | -6.5% |
| 114th | Ireland | 3,545 | 3.7% |
| 115th | Austria | 3,592 | -0.4% |
| 116th | Denmark | 3,604 | -4.5% |
| 117th | Korea | 3,666 | 8.6% |
| 118th | United Kingdom | 3,784 | -0.1% |
| 119th | Czechia | 3,809 | -6.6% |
| 120th | Japan | 3,994 | 1.4% |
| 121st | Germany | 4,080 | -2.3% |
| 122nd | France | 4,118 | -0.7% |
| 123rd | Russian Federation | 4,138 | 3.9% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,330 | 3.0% |
| 125th | Gibraltar | 4,401 | 4.1% |
| 126th | Singapore | 4,588 | -9.8% |
| 127th | Netherlands | 4,685 | -2.3% |
| 128th | Belgium | 5,611 | -0.2% |
| 129th | Australia | 5,645 | 1.1% |
| 130th | Sweden | 5,675 | -1.9% |
| 131st | Norway | 5,913 | 4.0% |
| 132nd | Saudi Arabia | 6,054 | -1.9% |
| 133rd | Finland | 6,284 | -0.6% |
| 134th | Trinidad and Tobago | 7,068 | 13.1% |
| 135th | Luxembourg | 7,267 | 2.8% |
| 136th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,427 | -0.3% |
| 137th | United States | 7,920 | 1.5% |
| 138th | Canada | 8,118 | 1.9% |
| 139th | Kuwait | 9,401 | 4.1% |
| 140th | United Arab Emirates | 9,839 | -5.2% |
| 141st | Iceland | 10,354 | 11.4% |
| 142nd | Bahrain | 12,576 | 0.1% |
| 143rd | Curaçao | 14,703 | -22.0% |
| 144th | Qatar | 18,488 | 0.5% |
FAQ
What was Serbia's energy use per capita in 1999?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita in 1999 was 1,658. This ranked 83rd globally.
How did Serbia's energy use per capita change in 1999?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita decreased by 27.1% in 1999 compared to 1998.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 1999?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 1999 at 18,488.
What is the energy use per capita of Serbia in 1999?▾
The energy use per capita of Serbia in 1999 was 1,658. This ranked 83rd globally.
How does 1999 compare to 1998 for Serbia's energy use per capita?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita went from 2,274 in 1998 to 1,658 in 1999, a 27.1% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Serbia matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 1999. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 95.0%. View full analysis →
Related
1998
2000
All years
Full ranking 1999
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 1994
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Montenegro
vs Kazakhstan
vs St. Lucia
vs Argentina
Global Ranking