Suriname - Population Density 2003
3.2
+0.1 from 2002
Suriname's population density was 3.2 in 2003, increased +0.1 from 3.1 in 2002. This was the 8th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Greenland | 0.1 | 0.3% |
| 2nd | Mongolia | 1.6 | 0.8% |
| 3rd | Namibia | 2.3 | 1.5% |
| 4th | Australia | 2.6 | 1.2% |
| 5th | Mauritania | 2.7 | 2.3% |
| 6th | Iceland | 2.9 | 0.7% |
| 7th | Botswana | 3.1 | 1.8% |
| 8th | Suriname | 3.2 | 2.0% |
| 9th | Libya | 3.2 | 2.0% |
| 10th | Canada | 3.5 | 0.9% |
| 11th | Guyana | 3.9 | -0.1% |
| 12th | Gabon | 5.4 | 2.8% |
| 13th | Kazakhstan | 5.8 | 0.6% |
| 14th | Central African Republic | 6.6 | 2.4% |
| 15th | Chad | 7.5 | 4.1% |
| 16th | Oman | 7.6 | 1.1% |
| 17th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 8.4 | 1.7% |
| 18th | Saudi Arabia | 8.7 | 4.9% |
| 19th | Russian Federation | 8.8 | -0.5% |
| 20th | Congo, Republic of | 10.1 | 2.8% |
| 21st | Niger | 10.1 | 3.6% |
| 22nd | Turkmenistan | 10.4 | 2.0% |
| 23rd | Mali | 10.4 | 3.2% |
| 24th | Belize | 11.6 | 3.0% |
| 25th | Norway | 12.5 | 0.6% |
| 26th | New Caledonia | 12.9 | 1.9% |
| 27th | Paraguay | 13.4 | 1.2% |
| 28th | Algeria | 13.5 | 1.3% |
| 29th | Papua New Guinea | 13.5 | 3.4% |
| 30th | Argentina | 14.0 | 1.0% |
| 31st | Angola | 14.4 | 3.6% |
| 32nd | Zambia | 14.8 | 3.2% |
| 33rd | New Zealand | 15.3 | 2.0% |
| 34th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | 15.8 | 3.8% |
| 35th | Bhutan | 16.0 | 2.1% |
| 36th | Vanuatu | 16.5 | 2.5% |
| 37th | Solomon Islands | 16.7 | 1.9% |
| 38th | Finland | 17.1 | 0.2% |
| 39th | Uruguay | 18.7 | 0.1% |
| 40th | Peru | 21.5 | 1.1% |
| 41st | Chile | 21.6 | 1.1% |
| 42nd | Brazil | 21.6 | 1.2% |
| 43rd | Sweden | 22.0 | 0.4% |
| 44th | Turks and Caicos Islands | 22.9 | 5.5% |
| 45th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 24.4 | 3.0% |
| 46th | Mozambique | 24.7 | 2.3% |
| 47th | Lao PDR | 24.7 | 1.6% |
| 48th | Eritrea | 24.7 | 4.2% |
| 49th | Kyrgyz Republic | 26.3 | 1.1% |
| 50th | Equatorial Guinea | 30.2 | 6.3% |
| 51st | Madagascar | 31.1 | 3.0% |
| 52nd | Zimbabwe | 31.6 | 1.2% |
| 53rd | United States | 31.7 | 0.9% |
| 54th | Estonia | 32.3 | -0.6% |
| 55th | Liberia | 32.4 | 0.8% |
| 56th | Bahamas, The | 33.5 | 1.2% |
| 57th | Cameroon | 34.2 | 2.8% |
| 58th | Faroe Islands | 34.4 | 1.5% |
| 59th | Afghanistan | 34.9 | 6.3% |
| 60th | Djibouti | 35.1 | 2.3% |
| 61st | Guinea | 36.1 | 2.3% |
| 62nd | Latvia | 36.8 | -1.0% |
| 63rd | Colombia | 36.9 | 1.5% |
| 64th | South Africa | 40.0 | 1.0% |
| 65th | Yemen, Republic of | 40.6 | 3.0% |
| 66th | Tanzania | 41.9 | 2.7% |
| 67th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 42.2 | 1.1% |
| 68th | Palau | 42.7 | 0.8% |
| 69th | Panama | 42.9 | 1.9% |
| 70th | Nicaragua | 43.3 | 1.2% |
| 71st | Guinea-Bissau | 46.9 | 2.3% |
| 72nd | Fiji | 47.4 | 1.0% |
| 73rd | Tajikistan | 47.6 | 1.9% |
| 74th | Burkina Faso | 47.8 | 3.2% |
| 75th | Belarus | 48.3 | -0.7% |
| 76th | Mexico | 53.0 | 1.4% |
| 77th | Ecuador | 53.8 | 1.8% |
| 78th | Lithuania | 54.5 | -0.8% |
| 79th | Senegal | 55.7 | 2.4% |
| 80th | Ireland | 58.0 | 1.6% |
| 81st | Uzbekistan | 59.0 | 1.2% |
| 82nd | United Arab Emirates | 59.0 | 6.0% |
| 83rd | Kenya | 59.1 | 3.1% |
| 84th | Côte d'Ivoire | 60.1 | 2.5% |
| 85th | Iraq | 61.3 | 3.1% |
| 86th | Timor-Leste | 61.7 | 4.3% |
| 87th | Eswatini | 62.0 | 0.7% |
| 88th | Honduras | 63.6 | 2.6% |
| 89th | Qatar | 64.1 | 4.7% |
| 90th | Tunisia | 64.8 | 1.0% |
| 91st | Jordan | 65.1 | 2.2% |
| 92nd | Lesotho | 65.4 | -0.5% |
| 93rd | Samoa | 65.5 | 0.5% |
| 94th | Brunei Darussalam | 65.8 | 1.9% |
| 95th | Morocco | 66.3 | 1.3% |
| 96th | Georgia | 69.1 | -0.7% |
| 97th | Benin | 70.2 | 3.1% |
| 98th | Myanmar | 71.4 | 0.9% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 71.5 | -0.8% |
| 100th | Sierra Leone | 71.7 | 4.1% |
| 101st | French Polynesia | 72.5 | 1.6% |
| 102nd | Cambodia | 73.9 | 1.5% |
| 103rd | Malaysia | 75.1 | 2.4% |
| 104th | Croatia | 76.9 | -0.1% |
| 105th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 78.2 | 2.1% |
| 106th | North Macedonia | 79.5 | 0.1% |
| 107th | Costa Rica | 81.1 | 1.5% |
| 108th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 81.6 | -0.2% |
| 109th | Ukraine | 83.4 | -0.7% |
| 110th | Spain | 84.5 | 1.8% |
| 111th | Greece | 84.8 | 0.2% |
| 112th | Türkiye | 88.1 | 1.2% |
| 113th | Dominica | 91.4 | 0.2% |
| 114th | Ghana | 93.6 | 2.7% |
| 115th | Romania | 93.8 | -0.8% |
| 116th | Syrian Arab Republic | 97.4 | 2.5% |
| 117th | Austria | 98.4 | 0.5% |
| 118th | Slovenia | 99.1 | 0.1% |
| 119th | Azerbaijan | 99.6 | 0.7% |
| 120th | Moldova | 101.1 | -0.2% |
| 121st | Togo | 102.1 | 2.6% |
| 122nd | Cuba | 105.4 | 0.3% |
| 123rd | Cyprus | 108.2 | 1.8% |
| 124th | European Union | 108.3 | 0.4% |
| 125th | Albania | 110.9 | -0.4% |
| 126th | Slovak Republic | 111.7 | -0.1% |
| 127th | Armenia | 111.8 | -0.5% |
| 128th | Hungary | 113.0 | -0.3% |
| 129th | Portugal | 114.3 | 0.4% |
| 130th | France | 115.5 | 0.7% |
| 131st | Kiribati | 116.3 | 2.1% |
| 132nd | Guatemala | 116.9 | 2.3% |
| 133rd | Cabo Verde | 117.5 | 1.4% |
| 134th | Kuwait | 118.4 | 2.4% |
| 135th | Indonesia | 119.9 | 1.3% |
| 136th | Poland | 124.8 | -0.1% |
| 137th | Thailand | 127.0 | 0.9% |
| 138th | Malawi | 129.2 | 2.5% |
| 139th | Uganda | 131.9 | 3.2% |
| 140th | Czechia | 131.9 | 0.0% |
| 141st | Denmark | 134.8 | 0.3% |
| 142nd | Isle of Man | 136.9 | 1.0% |
| 143rd | China | 137.2 | 0.6% |
| 144th | Northern Mariana Islands | 142.2 | -2.0% |
| 145th | Tonga | 145.1 | 0.6% |
| 146th | British Virgin Islands | 147.6 | 3.3% |
| 147th | Andorra | 147.8 | 4.5% |
| 148th | Nigeria | 150.6 | 2.8% |
| 149th | Gambia, The | 155.9 | 2.7% |
| 150th | São Tomé and Principe | 160.2 | 2.6% |
| 151st | Micronesia, Federated States of | 160.4 | -0.1% |
| 152nd | Luxembourg | 175.4 | 1.2% |
| 153rd | Antigua and Barbuda | 177.0 | 1.1% |
| 154th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 177.6 | 0.3% |
| 155th | Nepal | 179.2 | 1.4% |
| 156th | Seychelles | 180.0 | -1.1% |
| 157th | Cayman Islands | 183.1 | 3.3% |
| 158th | Switzerland | 185.7 | 0.7% |
| 159th | Dominican Republic | 185.9 | 1.5% |
| 160th | Italy | 194.1 | 0.5% |
| 161st | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 200.1 | 0.6% |
| 162nd | Liechtenstein | 213.0 | 1.1% |
| 163rd | Pakistan | 216.8 | 2.4% |
| 164th | Germany | 236.6 | 0.1% |
| 165th | Jamaica | 245.3 | 0.6% |
| 166th | United Kingdom | 246.5 | 0.5% |
| 167th | Viet Nam | 256.6 | 1.2% |
| 168th | Trinidad and Tobago | 261.0 | 0.5% |
| 169th | St. Lucia | 267.2 | 0.8% |
| 170th | Burundi | 274.3 | 3.2% |
| 171st | Philippines | 284.2 | 2.0% |
| 172nd | American Samoa | 284.9 | -0.2% |
| 173rd | Marshall Islands | 286.9 | 0.4% |
| 174th | El Salvador | 289.5 | 0.2% |
| 175th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 290.1 | -0.2% |
| 176th | Guam | 302.1 | 0.5% |
| 177th | Comoros | 306.2 | 1.9% |
| 178th | Israel | 309.1 | 1.8% |
| 179th | Virgin Islands (US) | 310.0 | 0.0% |
| 180th | Haiti | 317.8 | 1.8% |
| 181st | Sri Lanka | 318.2 | 0.7% |
| 182nd | Grenada | 320.2 | 0.4% |
| 183rd | Tuvalu | 323.2 | 0.7% |
| 184th | Belgium | 342.1 | 0.4% |
| 185th | Rwanda | 348.1 | 2.2% |
| 186th | Japan | 350.4 | 0.2% |
| 187th | India | 375.6 | 1.7% |
| 188th | Puerto Rico (US) | 431.4 | 0.1% |
| 189th | Lebanon | 442.4 | 1.4% |
| 190th | San Marino | 464.1 | 1.3% |
| 191st | Netherlands | 480.6 | 0.5% |
| 192nd | Korea | 494.8 | 0.5% |
| 193rd | Nauru | 503.0 | -0.2% |
| 194th | Aruba | 517.4 | 1.1% |
| 195th | West Bank and Gaza | 524.1 | 2.6% |
| 196th | Mauritius | 597.7 | 0.7% |
| 197th | Barbados | 618.1 | 0.6% |
| 198th | Channel Islands | 762.4 | 0.7% |
| 199th | Maldives | 988.3 | 1.7% |
| 200th | Bahrain | 1,061.8 | 6.1% |
| 201st | Bangladesh | 1,083.0 | 1.5% |
| 202nd | Bermuda | 1,155.3 | 0.4% |
| 203rd | Malta | 1,245.6 | 0.7% |
| 204th | Gibraltar | 2,827.4 | 1.6% |
| 205th | Singapore | 5,989.6 | -3.2% |
| 206th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 6,410.3 | -0.2% |
| 207th | Monaco | 15,971.4 | -0.1% |
| 208th | Macao SAR, China | 16,429.6 | 1.2% |
FAQ
What was Suriname's population density in 2003?▾
Suriname's population density in 2003 was 3.2. This ranked 8th globally.
How did Suriname's population density change in 2003?▾
Suriname's population density increased by 2.0% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest population density in 2003?▾
Macao SAR, China had the highest population density in 2003 at 16,429.6.
What is the population density of Suriname in 2003?▾
The population density of Suriname in 2003 was 3.2. This ranked 8th globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Suriname's population density?▾
Suriname's population density went from 3.1 in 2002 to 3.2 in 2003, a 2.0% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Suriname matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2003. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 9.9%. View full analysis →
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
Population
Population Growth
Urban Population
Life Expectancy
Birth Rate
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 1961
Population Density 1990s
Population Density 2000s
Population Density 2010s
Population Density 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Fiji
vs Libya
vs Paraguay
vs Botswana
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Population Density
Global Ranking