Tanzania - Energy Use per Capita 2012
Tanzania's energy use per capita was 425 in 2012, decreased +8 from 433 in 2011. This was the 24th highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | South Sudan | 59 | - |
| 2nd | Niger | 128 | 13.7% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 208 | 3.9% |
| 4th | Yemen, Republic of | 211 | -12.2% |
| 5th | Chad | 229 | 10.0% |
| 6th | Burkina Faso | 249 | 5.7% |
| 7th | Eritrea | 262 | 1.3% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 265 | 2.3% |
| 9th | Tajikistan | 295 | 5.7% |
| 10th | Senegal | 302 | -4.7% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 304 | 8.5% |
| 12th | Ghana | 329 | 8.5% |
| 13th | Cambodia | 334 | 2.8% |
| 14th | Benin | 346 | -1.9% |
| 15th | Rwanda | 354 | 1.1% |
| 16th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 355 | 19.5% |
| 17th | Nigeria | 357 | -5.1% |
| 18th | Mozambique | 365 | -1.6% |
| 19th | Cameroon | 369 | 1.5% |
| 20th | Nepal | 369 | -4.1% |
| 21st | Sudan | 391 | -16.4% |
| 22nd | Haiti | 409 | 1.6% |
| 23rd | Pakistan | 420 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Tanzania | 425 | -1.8% |
| 25th | Lao PDR | 431 | 1.5% |
| 26th | Uganda | 436 | 1.6% |
| 27th | Philippines | 437 | 2.1% |
| 28th | Togo | 440 | -2.9% |
| 29th | Côte d'Ivoire | 442 | 7.3% |
| 30th | Zimbabwe | 455 | 2.2% |
| 31st | Kenya | 463 | -2.1% |
| 32nd | Sri Lanka | 482 | 2.1% |
| 33rd | Angola | 531 | 9.3% |
| 34th | Congo, Republic of | 540 | 11.5% |
| 35th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 550 | -2.4% |
| 36th | Morocco | 560 | 0.1% |
| 37th | Nicaragua | 567 | 6.7% |
| 38th | India | 572 | 4.7% |
| 39th | Honduras | 611 | 0.6% |
| 40th | Zambia | 662 | 2.5% |
| 41st | Viet Nam | 664 | 0.1% |
| 42nd | Namibia | 667 | 1.5% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 681 | 2.4% |
| 44th | Colombia | 681 | -4.1% |
| 45th | Albania | 699 | -8.8% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 701 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Syrian Arab Republic | 704 | -22.2% |
| 48th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 704 | 6.6% |
| 49th | Kyrgyz Republic | 731 | 22.5% |
| 50th | Peru | 732 | 6.4% |
| 51st | Guatemala | 734 | 2.8% |
| 52nd | Dominican Republic | 791 | 1.5% |
| 53rd | Paraguay | 839 | -0.9% |
| 54th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 866 | 0.7% |
| 55th | Ecuador | 872 | -2.2% |
| 56th | Jamaica | 889 | -3.8% |
| 57th | Tunisia | 930 | 3.0% |
| 58th | Armenia | 982 | 9.5% |
| 59th | Cuba | 990 | 2.0% |
| 60th | Georgia | 994 | 5.3% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 996 | -0.6% |
| 62nd | Costa Rica | 1,018 | 2.5% |
| 63rd | Jordan | 1,035 | 9.5% |
| 64th | Panama | 1,053 | 1.5% |
| 65th | Mauritius | 1,066 | 1.2% |
| 66th | Iraq | 1,190 | 5.7% |
| 67th | Botswana | 1,197 | 11.9% |
| 68th | Algeria | 1,259 | 7.2% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,310 | -7.1% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,317 | -0.4% |
| 71st | Lebanon | 1,383 | 10.1% |
| 72nd | Uzbekistan | 1,388 | -13.4% |
| 73rd | Uruguay | 1,408 | 6.0% |
| 74th | Suriname | 1,412 | -15.8% |
| 75th | Brazil | 1,433 | 3.1% |
| 76th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,435 | -1.1% |
| 77th | Azerbaijan | 1,497 | 7.3% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,550 | -4.3% |
| 79th | Mongolia | 1,559 | 2.5% |
| 80th | Türkiye | 1,567 | 3.4% |
| 81st | Mexico | 1,652 | 1.2% |
| 82nd | Montenegro | 1,701 | -6.1% |
| 83rd | Romania | 1,737 | -2.0% |
| 84th | Thailand | 1,818 | 6.6% |
| 85th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,821 | -4.6% |
| 86th | Argentina | 1,898 | 1.7% |
| 87th | Cyprus | 1,936 | -7.5% |
| 88th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,945 | -4.6% |
| 89th | Gabon | 1,955 | -14.8% |
| 90th | Croatia | 2,020 | -5.5% |
| 91st | Serbia | 2,024 | -9.7% |
| 92nd | Portugal | 2,039 | -5.8% |
| 93rd | China | 2,085 | 2.8% |
| 94th | Malta | 2,103 | 5.0% |
| 95th | Chile | 2,123 | 9.6% |
| 96th | Latvia | 2,171 | 5.0% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,394 | -5.6% |
| 98th | Greece | 2,409 | -0.2% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,468 | 2.3% |
| 100th | Hungary | 2,490 | -4.3% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | 2,493 | -3.8% |
| 102nd | Poland | 2,564 | -3.4% |
| 103rd | Malaysia | 2,587 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Ukraine | 2,651 | -3.0% |
| 105th | Spain | 2,677 | -0.3% |
| 106th | Italy | 2,680 | -4.2% |
| 107th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,740 | 3.1% |
| 108th | Ireland | 2,859 | -0.6% |
| 109th | Israel | 2,969 | -0.4% |
| 110th | United Kingdom | 3,029 | 1.8% |
| 111th | Denmark | 3,072 | -4.6% |
| 112th | Libya | 3,101 | 17.8% |
| 113th | Switzerland | 3,176 | -0.2% |
| 114th | Belarus | 3,219 | 4.5% |
| 115th | Slovak Republic | 3,221 | -3.6% |
| 116th | European Union | 3,306 | -1.4% |
| 117th | Slovenia | 3,429 | -4.2% |
| 118th | Japan | 3,537 | -2.3% |
| 119th | Austria | 3,899 | -0.7% |
| 120th | Germany | 3,913 | 0.6% |
| 121st | France | 3,929 | -0.6% |
| 122nd | Estonia | 3,984 | -7.6% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,110 | -0.8% |
| 124th | Turkmenistan | 4,232 | -1.9% |
| 125th | Kazakhstan | 4,270 | -5.8% |
| 126th | New Zealand | 4,281 | 4.2% |
| 127th | Netherlands | 4,599 | -0.3% |
| 128th | Singapore | 4,787 | 17.1% |
| 129th | Belgium | 4,823 | -4.7% |
| 130th | Russian Federation | 5,056 | 1.0% |
| 131st | Korea | 5,123 | 0.2% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,296 | 0.3% |
| 133rd | Gibraltar | 5,366 | 1.2% |
| 134th | Australia | 5,534 | -2.9% |
| 135th | Norway | 5,805 | 5.5% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,266 | -3.9% |
| 137th | Oman | 6,703 | -6.3% |
| 138th | United States | 6,820 | -2.7% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,638 | -1.0% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 7,724 | -4.2% |
| 141st | Saudi Arabia | 7,862 | -1.5% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,614 | 0.7% |
| 143rd | Brunei Darussalam | 9,446 | -2.6% |
| 144th | Bahrain | 9,997 | -5.9% |
| 145th | Kuwait | 10,424 | -0.8% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 14,480 | -2.4% |
| 147th | Curaçao | 14,573 | 1.6% |
| 148th | Iceland | 17,634 | -2.9% |
| 149th | Qatar | 21,456 | 30.2% |
FAQ
Tanzania's energy use per capita in 2012 was 425. This ranked 24th globally.
Tanzania's energy use per capita decreased by 1.8% in 2012 compared to 2011.
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2012 at 21,456.
The energy use per capita of Tanzania in 2012 was 425. This ranked 24th globally.
Tanzania's energy use per capita went from 433 in 2011 to 425 in 2012, a 1.8% decrease.
Tanzania matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2012. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 6.1%. View full analysis →