Bangladesh - Energy Use per Capita 2009
Bangladesh's energy use per capita was 188 in 2009, increased +7 from 180 in 2008. This was the 3rd highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 130 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 171 | 1.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 188 | 4.0% |
| 4th | Chad | 224 | 3.2% |
| 5th | Eritrea | 245 | 2.3% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 254 | -2.1% |
| 7th | Nigeria | 260 | -9.3% |
| 8th | Ghana | 274 | -0.4% |
| 9th | Tajikistan | 285 | -14.9% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 288 | -0.1% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 291 | -6.1% |
| 12th | Senegal | 305 | 17.6% |
| 13th | Yemen, Republic of | 311 | 7.3% |
| 14th | Cambodia | 311 | 5.1% |
| 15th | Rwanda | 350 | 0.9% |
| 16th | Mozambique | 359 | 6.0% |
| 17th | Congo, Republic of | 359 | 9.6% |
| 18th | Benin | 362 | 1.8% |
| 19th | Cameroon | 364 | 5.1% |
| 20th | Nepal | 365 | 2.3% |
| 21st | Haiti | 377 | 2.4% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 415 | 3.0% |
| 23rd | Tanzania | 415 | 0.0% |
| 24th | Zimbabwe | 418 | 0.5% |
| 25th | Lao PDR | 420 | 3.3% |
| 26th | Philippines | 421 | -4.2% |
| 27th | Côte d'Ivoire | 426 | -10.4% |
| 28th | Pakistan | 433 | -1.0% |
| 29th | Sri Lanka | 441 | 0.9% |
| 30th | Kenya | 471 | 3.2% |
| 31st | Togo | 476 | 18.2% |
| 32nd | Sudan | 482 | 1.9% |
| 33rd | Morocco | 505 | -0.6% |
| 34th | Angola | 505 | 7.0% |
| 35th | India | 509 | 5.8% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 523 | -1.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 535 | -9.9% |
| 38th | Honduras | 566 | -3.4% |
| 39th | Peru | 583 | 0.3% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 586 | 2.5% |
| 41st | Viet Nam | 615 | 7.5% |
| 42nd | Zambia | 620 | 0.5% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 675 | 6.7% |
| 44th | El Salvador | 689 | -1.8% |
| 45th | Colombia | 715 | 3.3% |
| 46th | Guatemala | 721 | 5.0% |
| 47th | Albania | 734 | 3.1% |
| 48th | Dominican Republic | 744 | -3.8% |
| 49th | Namibia | 776 | 2.3% |
| 50th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 778 | -4.4% |
| 51st | Paraguay | 804 | 1.1% |
| 52nd | Georgia | 812 | 3.9% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 830 | 8.9% |
| 54th | Armenia | 851 | -12.5% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 860 | -3.8% |
| 56th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 862 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Panama | 872 | 8.0% |
| 58th | Cuba | 922 | -3.0% |
| 59th | Jamaica | 943 | -19.9% |
| 60th | Syrian Arab Republic | 978 | -8.3% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 995 | 12.0% |
| 62nd | Iraq | 996 | 3.5% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 1,000 | -2.6% |
| 64th | Costa Rica | 1,002 | -0.4% |
| 65th | Jordan | 1,044 | 3.3% |
| 66th | Botswana | 1,054 | -9.0% |
| 67th | Moldova | 1,111 | -4.9% |
| 68th | Algeria | 1,147 | 7.2% |
| 69th | Suriname | 1,164 | -1.1% |
| 70th | Uruguay | 1,255 | -1.5% |
| 71st | Brazil | 1,262 | -4.2% |
| 72nd | Lebanon | 1,337 | 25.9% |
| 73rd | Mongolia | 1,355 | 2.1% |
| 74th | Kosovo | 1,356 | 10.3% |
| 75th | Türkiye | 1,364 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,376 | -2.0% |
| 77th | Azerbaijan | 1,391 | -12.3% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,438 | -6.7% |
| 79th | Uzbekistan | 1,489 | -10.1% |
| 80th | Montenegro | 1,555 | -20.9% |
| 81st | Thailand | 1,579 | -1.1% |
| 82nd | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,603 | 6.1% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,617 | -3.7% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,708 | -11.3% |
| 85th | Argentina | 1,723 | -8.8% |
| 86th | China | 1,729 | 6.1% |
| 87th | Chile | 1,736 | -3.6% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,953 | -9.3% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,043 | 2.9% |
| 90th | Latvia | 2,056 | -2.4% |
| 91st | Serbia | 2,074 | -9.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,200 | -3.4% |
| 93rd | Portugal | 2,304 | -1.4% |
| 94th | Cyprus | 2,312 | -3.7% |
| 95th | Bulgaria | 2,337 | -11.7% |
| 96th | Ukraine | 2,453 | -14.7% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,463 | -3.9% |
| 98th | Malaysia | 2,484 | -7.3% |
| 99th | Hungary | 2,549 | -4.8% |
| 100th | Greece | 2,655 | -3.5% |
| 101st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,672 | -1.4% |
| 102nd | Gabon | 2,729 | 5.8% |
| 103rd | South Africa | 2,735 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Spain | 2,750 | -8.8% |
| 105th | Lithuania | 2,772 | -7.0% |
| 106th | Libya | 2,785 | 8.0% |
| 107th | Belarus | 2,789 | -5.1% |
| 108th | Italy | 2,848 | -7.2% |
| 109th | Israel | 2,875 | -8.2% |
| 110th | Slovak Republic | 3,108 | -8.8% |
| 111th | United Kingdom | 3,144 | -6.7% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,174 | -4.2% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,326 | -6.0% |
| 114th | Denmark | 3,359 | -4.1% |
| 115th | Estonia | 3,361 | -18.9% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,461 | -0.6% |
| 117th | Slovenia | 3,514 | -11.1% |
| 118th | Turkmenistan | 3,648 | -13.9% |
| 119th | Japan | 3,709 | -4.1% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,819 | -5.2% |
| 121st | Kazakhstan | 3,820 | -10.2% |
| 122nd | Germany | 3,822 | -6.4% |
| 123rd | France | 3,938 | -4.8% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,073 | -0.7% |
| 125th | Czechia | 4,078 | -6.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,529 | -6.1% |
| 127th | Korea | 4,558 | 1.0% |
| 128th | Netherlands | 4,666 | -1.9% |
| 129th | Sweden | 4,891 | -9.1% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,161 | -4.9% |
| 131st | Singapore | 5,321 | 7.3% |
| 132nd | Gibraltar | 5,548 | 6.3% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,844 | -1.8% |
| 134th | Oman | 5,912 | -0.3% |
| 135th | Norway | 6,201 | -3.3% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,255 | -6.0% |
| 137th | United States | 7,053 | -5.8% |
| 138th | Saudi Arabia | 7,125 | 2.1% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,696 | -5.0% |
| 140th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,906 | -15.7% |
| 141st | Luxembourg | 7,959 | -7.7% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 9,486 | 0.6% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 10,433 | -10.0% |
| 144th | Kuwait | 10,529 | -1.1% |
| 145th | Trinidad and Tobago | 14,193 | 0.2% |
| 146th | Qatar | 15,063 | -5.5% |
| 147th | Curaçao | 15,357 | 3.4% |
| 148th | Iceland | 17,937 | 3.4% |
FAQ
Bangladesh's energy use per capita in 2009 was 188. This ranked 3rd globally.
Bangladesh's energy use per capita increased by 4.0% in 2009 compared to 2008.
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2009 at 17,937.
The energy use per capita of Bangladesh in 2009 was 188. This ranked 3rd globally.
Bangladesh's energy use per capita went from 180 in 2008 to 188 in 2009, a 4.0% increase.
Bangladesh matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2009. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 6.5%. View full analysis →