Serbia - Energy Use per Capita 2009
2,074
−219 from 2008
Serbia's energy use per capita was 2,074 in 2009, decreased +219 from 2,292 in 2008. This was the 91st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2009▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 130 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 171 | 1.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 188 | 4.0% |
| 4th | Chad | 224 | 3.2% |
| 5th | Eritrea | 245 | 2.3% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 254 | -2.1% |
| 7th | Nigeria | 260 | -9.3% |
| 8th | Ghana | 274 | -0.4% |
| 9th | Tajikistan | 285 | -14.9% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 288 | -0.1% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 291 | -6.1% |
| 12th | Senegal | 305 | 17.6% |
| 13th | Yemen, Republic of | 311 | 7.3% |
| 14th | Cambodia | 311 | 5.1% |
| 15th | Rwanda | 350 | 0.9% |
| 16th | Mozambique | 359 | 6.0% |
| 17th | Congo, Republic of | 359 | 9.6% |
| 18th | Benin | 362 | 1.8% |
| 19th | Cameroon | 364 | 5.1% |
| 20th | Nepal | 365 | 2.3% |
| 21st | Haiti | 377 | 2.4% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 415 | 3.0% |
| 23rd | Tanzania | 415 | 0.0% |
| 24th | Zimbabwe | 418 | 0.5% |
| 25th | Lao PDR | 420 | 3.3% |
| 26th | Philippines | 421 | -4.2% |
| 27th | Côte d'Ivoire | 426 | -10.4% |
| 28th | Pakistan | 433 | -1.0% |
| 29th | Sri Lanka | 441 | 0.9% |
| 30th | Kenya | 471 | 3.2% |
| 31st | Togo | 476 | 18.2% |
| 32nd | Sudan | 482 | 1.9% |
| 33rd | Morocco | 505 | -0.6% |
| 34th | Angola | 505 | 7.0% |
| 35th | India | 509 | 5.8% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 523 | -1.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 535 | -9.9% |
| 38th | Honduras | 566 | -3.4% |
| 39th | Peru | 583 | 0.3% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 586 | 2.5% |
| 41st | Viet Nam | 615 | 7.5% |
| 42nd | Zambia | 620 | 0.5% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 675 | 6.7% |
| 44th | El Salvador | 689 | -1.8% |
| 45th | Colombia | 715 | 3.3% |
| 46th | Guatemala | 721 | 5.0% |
| 47th | Albania | 734 | 3.1% |
| 48th | Dominican Republic | 744 | -3.8% |
| 49th | Namibia | 776 | 2.3% |
| 50th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 778 | -4.4% |
| 51st | Paraguay | 804 | 1.1% |
| 52nd | Georgia | 812 | 3.9% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 830 | 8.9% |
| 54th | Armenia | 851 | -12.5% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 860 | -3.8% |
| 56th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 862 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Panama | 872 | 8.0% |
| 58th | Cuba | 922 | -3.0% |
| 59th | Jamaica | 943 | -19.9% |
| 60th | Syrian Arab Republic | 978 | -8.3% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 995 | 12.0% |
| 62nd | Iraq | 996 | 3.5% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 1,000 | -2.6% |
| 64th | Costa Rica | 1,002 | -0.4% |
| 65th | Jordan | 1,044 | 3.3% |
| 66th | Botswana | 1,054 | -9.0% |
| 67th | Moldova | 1,111 | -4.9% |
| 68th | Algeria | 1,147 | 7.2% |
| 69th | Suriname | 1,164 | -1.1% |
| 70th | Uruguay | 1,255 | -1.5% |
| 71st | Brazil | 1,262 | -4.2% |
| 72nd | Lebanon | 1,337 | 25.9% |
| 73rd | Mongolia | 1,355 | 2.1% |
| 74th | Kosovo | 1,356 | 10.3% |
| 75th | Türkiye | 1,364 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,376 | -2.0% |
| 77th | Azerbaijan | 1,391 | -12.3% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,438 | -6.7% |
| 79th | Uzbekistan | 1,489 | -10.1% |
| 80th | Montenegro | 1,555 | -20.9% |
| 81st | Thailand | 1,579 | -1.1% |
| 82nd | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,603 | 6.1% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,617 | -3.7% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,708 | -11.3% |
| 85th | Argentina | 1,723 | -8.8% |
| 86th | China | 1,729 | 6.1% |
| 87th | Chile | 1,736 | -3.6% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,953 | -9.3% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,043 | 2.9% |
| 90th | Latvia | 2,056 | -2.4% |
| 91st | Serbia | 2,074 | -9.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,200 | -3.4% |
| 93rd | Portugal | 2,304 | -1.4% |
| 94th | Cyprus | 2,312 | -3.7% |
| 95th | Bulgaria | 2,337 | -11.7% |
| 96th | Ukraine | 2,453 | -14.7% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,463 | -3.9% |
| 98th | Malaysia | 2,484 | -7.3% |
| 99th | Hungary | 2,549 | -4.8% |
| 100th | Greece | 2,655 | -3.5% |
| 101st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,672 | -1.4% |
| 102nd | Gabon | 2,729 | 5.8% |
| 103rd | South Africa | 2,735 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Spain | 2,750 | -8.8% |
| 105th | Lithuania | 2,772 | -7.0% |
| 106th | Libya | 2,785 | 8.0% |
| 107th | Belarus | 2,789 | -5.1% |
| 108th | Italy | 2,848 | -7.2% |
| 109th | Israel | 2,875 | -8.2% |
| 110th | Slovak Republic | 3,108 | -8.8% |
| 111th | United Kingdom | 3,144 | -6.7% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,174 | -4.2% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,326 | -6.0% |
| 114th | Denmark | 3,359 | -4.1% |
| 115th | Estonia | 3,361 | -18.9% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,461 | -0.6% |
| 117th | Slovenia | 3,514 | -11.1% |
| 118th | Turkmenistan | 3,648 | -13.9% |
| 119th | Japan | 3,709 | -4.1% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,819 | -5.2% |
| 121st | Kazakhstan | 3,820 | -10.2% |
| 122nd | Germany | 3,822 | -6.4% |
| 123rd | France | 3,938 | -4.8% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,073 | -0.7% |
| 125th | Czechia | 4,078 | -6.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,529 | -6.1% |
| 127th | Korea | 4,558 | 1.0% |
| 128th | Netherlands | 4,666 | -1.9% |
| 129th | Sweden | 4,891 | -9.1% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,161 | -4.9% |
| 131st | Singapore | 5,321 | 7.3% |
| 132nd | Gibraltar | 5,548 | 6.3% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,844 | -1.8% |
| 134th | Oman | 5,912 | -0.3% |
| 135th | Norway | 6,201 | -3.3% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,255 | -6.0% |
| 137th | United States | 7,053 | -5.8% |
| 138th | Saudi Arabia | 7,125 | 2.1% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,696 | -5.0% |
| 140th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,906 | -15.7% |
| 141st | Luxembourg | 7,959 | -7.7% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 9,486 | 0.6% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 10,433 | -10.0% |
| 144th | Kuwait | 10,529 | -1.1% |
| 145th | Trinidad and Tobago | 14,193 | 0.2% |
| 146th | Qatar | 15,063 | -5.5% |
| 147th | Curaçao | 15,357 | 3.4% |
| 148th | Iceland | 17,937 | 3.4% |
FAQ
What was Serbia's energy use per capita in 2009?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita in 2009 was 2,074. This ranked 91st globally.
How did Serbia's energy use per capita change in 2009?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita decreased by 9.5% in 2009 compared to 2008.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2009?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2009 at 17,937.
What is the energy use per capita of Serbia in 2009?▾
The energy use per capita of Serbia in 2009 was 2,074. This ranked 91st globally.
How does 2009 compare to 2008 for Serbia's energy use per capita?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita went from 2,292 in 2008 to 2,074 in 2009, a 9.5% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Serbia matched the Stagflation Risk pattern in 2009. Historically: 307 occurrences, 117 successful (38%). Outcome 24 months later: 11.1%. View full analysis →
Related
2008
2010
All years
Full ranking 2009
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 1994
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Montenegro
vs Kazakhstan
vs St. Lucia
vs Argentina
Global Ranking