China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2002
94.56
+16.40 from 2001
China's real effective exchange rate was 94.56 in 2002, increased +16.40 from 96.77 in 2001. This was the 44th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2002▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Slovak Republic | 60.15 | 3.8% |
| 2nd | Brazil | 60.90 | -38.7% |
| 3rd | Russian Federation | 66.46 | -20.5% |
| 4th | Zambia | 69.96 | 2.4% |
| 5th | Equatorial Guinea | 70.35 | 9.4% |
| 6th | Australia | 70.86 | -11.1% |
| 7th | Moldova | 71.71 | -5.4% |
| 8th | Canada | 72.77 | -21.0% |
| 9th | Armenia | 73.74 | 0.8% |
| 10th | Bulgaria | 75.79 | 8.0% |
| 11th | South Africa | 76.11 | -33.9% |
| 12th | Papua New Guinea | 77.19 | -6.6% |
| 13th | Lesotho | 77.40 | -37.2% |
| 14th | Nigeria | 78.42 | 0.3% |
| 15th | Colombia | 78.67 | -24.9% |
| 16th | Trinidad and Tobago | 78.72 | 2.5% |
| 17th | Thailand | 78.81 | 2.8% |
| 18th | Estonia | 78.82 | 2.6% |
| 19th | Czechia | 79.43 | 12.8% |
| 20th | Serbia | 80.57 | 15.4% |
| 21st | Samoa | 81.31 | 5.7% |
| 22nd | New Zealand | 82.55 | 8.6% |
| 23rd | Georgia | 82.93 | -3.1% |
| 24th | Romania | 83.62 | -0.2% |
| 25th | Lithuania | 84.13 | 2.5% |
| 26th | Paraguay | 85.16 | -13.1% |
| 27th | Philippines | 86.75 | 14.4% |
| 28th | Hungary | 86.89 | -5.0% |
| 29th | Indonesia | 88.09 | 21.0% |
| 30th | Ghana | 88.56 | -5.1% |
| 31st | Greece | 88.86 | -9.2% |
| 32nd | Latvia | 89.13 | -1.3% |
| 33rd | United Arab Emirates | 89.35 | -0.6% |
| 34th | India | 89.59 | -3.5% |
| 35th | Ireland | 89.65 | -6.6% |
| 36th | Central African Republic | 91.15 | 2.2% |
| 37th | Chile | 91.66 | -15.9% |
| 38th | Spain | 92.18 | -1.0% |
| 39th | Côte d'Ivoire | 93.21 | 4.0% |
| 40th | Costa Rica | 93.61 | -2.3% |
| 41st | Malta | 93.86 | -1.5% |
| 42nd | Croatia | 93.95 | -5.0% |
| 43rd | Uruguay | 94.01 | -15.0% |
| 44th | China | 94.56 | 21.0% |
| 45th | Luxembourg | 94.86 | 0.7% |
| 46th | Peru | 94.87 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Togo | 94.88 | 3.7% |
| 48th | Cyprus | 94.90 | -4.6% |
| 49th | Belgium | 95.13 | 3.5% |
| 50th | Guyana | 95.50 | 1.1% |
| 51st | Denmark | 95.58 | 1.9% |
| 52nd | Gabon | 96.25 | -0.1% |
| 53rd | Singapore | 96.45 | 3.0% |
| 54th | Italy | 96.80 | -3.0% |
| 55th | Portugal | 97.80 | -0.4% |
| 56th | Switzerland | 98.10 | 12.0% |
| 57th | Netherlands | 98.38 | 4.6% |
| 58th | France | 98.38 | -4.0% |
| 59th | Poland | 98.86 | -11.4% |
| 60th | Austria | 99.30 | 3.8% |
| 61st | Slovenia | 99.58 | 1.9% |
| 62nd | Cameroon | 100.32 | 3.6% |
| 63rd | Norway | 100.47 | -15.9% |
| 64th | Germany | 100.79 | -2.1% |
| 65th | Israel | 100.87 | 0.9% |
| 66th | Pakistan | 101.63 | 3.6% |
| 67th | Finland | 102.10 | 0.0% |
| 68th | Solomon Islands | 102.28 | -16.4% |
| 69th | North Macedonia | 102.67 | 0.3% |
| 70th | Burundi | 103.43 | -12.9% |
| 71st | Malaysia | 103.47 | -14.4% |
| 72nd | Ukraine | 103.95 | -3.9% |
| 73rd | Japan | 104.15 | -27.9% |
| 74th | Korea | 104.45 | 8.9% |
| 75th | Sweden | 104.66 | -9.7% |
| 76th | Dominican Republic | 105.65 | -2.4% |
| 77th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 107.19 | -0.5% |
| 78th | Nicaragua | 107.66 | -2.4% |
| 79th | Fiji | 107.71 | 0.2% |
| 80th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 108.01 | -2.8% |
| 81st | Uganda | 109.19 | -4.3% |
| 82nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 109.51 | -1.5% |
| 83rd | Morocco | 109.71 | 2.3% |
| 84th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 110.36 | -55.1% |
| 85th | Grenada | 110.58 | -1.7% |
| 86th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 112.37 | -62.1% |
| 87th | St. Lucia | 113.42 | -2.9% |
| 88th | Algeria | 114.30 | -16.4% |
| 89th | Belize | 114.69 | -0.5% |
| 90th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 116.59 | -2.1% |
| 91st | Antigua and Barbuda | 117.76 | 0.7% |
| 92nd | Bahamas, The | 119.09 | -1.2% |
| 93rd | Dominica | 120.25 | -1.4% |
| 94th | Mexico | 123.07 | -23.6% |
| 95th | Saudi Arabia | 123.12 | 20.0% |
| 96th | Sierra Leone | 123.48 | -13.6% |
| 97th | United States | 125.92 | 18.2% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 127.53 | -1.1% |
| 99th | Iceland | 127.70 | 29.2% |
| 100th | United Kingdom | 128.18 | -0.1% |
| 101st | Türkiye | 129.31 | 9.6% |
| 102nd | Gambia, The | 131.60 | -17.0% |
| 103rd | Bahrain | 136.24 | 2.3% |
| 104th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 145.64 | 25.6% |
| 105th | Malawi | 158.27 | 9.1% |
| 106th | Argentina | 226.09 | -54.7% |
FAQ
What was China's real effective exchange rate in 2002?▾
China's real effective exchange rate in 2002 was 94.56. This ranked 44th globally.
How did China's real effective exchange rate change in 2002?▾
China's real effective exchange rate increased by 21.0% in 2002 compared to 2001.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2002?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2002 at 226.09.
What is the real effective exchange rate of China in 2002?▾
The real effective exchange rate of China in 2002 was 94.56. This ranked 44th globally.
How does 2002 compare to 2001 for China's real effective exchange rate?▾
China's real effective exchange rate went from 96.77 in 2001 to 94.56 in 2002, a 21.0% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2002. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). View full analysis →
Related
2001
2003
All years
Full ranking 2002
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1980
Lowest: 1994
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Malaysia
vs Mexico
vs Nauru
vs Argentina
G20 Real Effective Exchange Rate
BRICS+ Real Effective Exchange Rate
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Real Effective Exchange Rate
Global Ranking