Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2002
145.64
+29.65 from 2001
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 145.64 in 2002, increased +29.65 from 151.90 in 2001. This was the 104th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2002▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Slovak Republic | 60.15 | 3.8% |
| 2nd | Brazil | 60.90 | -38.7% |
| 3rd | Russian Federation | 66.46 | -20.5% |
| 4th | Zambia | 69.96 | 2.4% |
| 5th | Equatorial Guinea | 70.35 | 9.4% |
| 6th | Australia | 70.86 | -11.1% |
| 7th | Moldova | 71.71 | -5.4% |
| 8th | Canada | 72.77 | -21.0% |
| 9th | Armenia | 73.74 | 0.8% |
| 10th | Bulgaria | 75.79 | 8.0% |
| 11th | South Africa | 76.11 | -33.9% |
| 12th | Papua New Guinea | 77.19 | -6.6% |
| 13th | Lesotho | 77.40 | -37.2% |
| 14th | Nigeria | 78.42 | 0.3% |
| 15th | Colombia | 78.67 | -24.9% |
| 16th | Trinidad and Tobago | 78.72 | 2.5% |
| 17th | Thailand | 78.81 | 2.8% |
| 18th | Estonia | 78.82 | 2.6% |
| 19th | Czechia | 79.43 | 12.8% |
| 20th | Serbia | 80.57 | 15.4% |
| 21st | Samoa | 81.31 | 5.7% |
| 22nd | New Zealand | 82.55 | 8.6% |
| 23rd | Georgia | 82.93 | -3.1% |
| 24th | Romania | 83.62 | -0.2% |
| 25th | Lithuania | 84.13 | 2.5% |
| 26th | Paraguay | 85.16 | -13.1% |
| 27th | Philippines | 86.75 | 14.4% |
| 28th | Hungary | 86.89 | -5.0% |
| 29th | Indonesia | 88.09 | 21.0% |
| 30th | Ghana | 88.56 | -5.1% |
| 31st | Greece | 88.86 | -9.2% |
| 32nd | Latvia | 89.13 | -1.3% |
| 33rd | United Arab Emirates | 89.35 | -0.6% |
| 34th | India | 89.59 | -3.5% |
| 35th | Ireland | 89.65 | -6.6% |
| 36th | Central African Republic | 91.15 | 2.2% |
| 37th | Chile | 91.66 | -15.9% |
| 38th | Spain | 92.18 | -1.0% |
| 39th | Côte d'Ivoire | 93.21 | 4.0% |
| 40th | Costa Rica | 93.61 | -2.3% |
| 41st | Malta | 93.86 | -1.5% |
| 42nd | Croatia | 93.95 | -5.0% |
| 43rd | Uruguay | 94.01 | -15.0% |
| 44th | China | 94.56 | 21.0% |
| 45th | Luxembourg | 94.86 | 0.7% |
| 46th | Peru | 94.87 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Togo | 94.88 | 3.7% |
| 48th | Cyprus | 94.90 | -4.6% |
| 49th | Belgium | 95.13 | 3.5% |
| 50th | Guyana | 95.50 | 1.1% |
| 51st | Denmark | 95.58 | 1.9% |
| 52nd | Gabon | 96.25 | -0.1% |
| 53rd | Singapore | 96.45 | 3.0% |
| 54th | Italy | 96.80 | -3.0% |
| 55th | Portugal | 97.80 | -0.4% |
| 56th | Switzerland | 98.10 | 12.0% |
| 57th | Netherlands | 98.38 | 4.6% |
| 58th | France | 98.38 | -4.0% |
| 59th | Poland | 98.86 | -11.4% |
| 60th | Austria | 99.30 | 3.8% |
| 61st | Slovenia | 99.58 | 1.9% |
| 62nd | Cameroon | 100.32 | 3.6% |
| 63rd | Norway | 100.47 | -15.9% |
| 64th | Germany | 100.79 | -2.1% |
| 65th | Israel | 100.87 | 0.9% |
| 66th | Pakistan | 101.63 | 3.6% |
| 67th | Finland | 102.10 | 0.0% |
| 68th | Solomon Islands | 102.28 | -16.4% |
| 69th | North Macedonia | 102.67 | 0.3% |
| 70th | Burundi | 103.43 | -12.9% |
| 71st | Malaysia | 103.47 | -14.4% |
| 72nd | Ukraine | 103.95 | -3.9% |
| 73rd | Japan | 104.15 | -27.9% |
| 74th | Korea | 104.45 | 8.9% |
| 75th | Sweden | 104.66 | -9.7% |
| 76th | Dominican Republic | 105.65 | -2.4% |
| 77th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 107.19 | -0.5% |
| 78th | Nicaragua | 107.66 | -2.4% |
| 79th | Fiji | 107.71 | 0.2% |
| 80th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 108.01 | -2.8% |
| 81st | Uganda | 109.19 | -4.3% |
| 82nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 109.51 | -1.5% |
| 83rd | Morocco | 109.71 | 2.3% |
| 84th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 110.36 | -55.1% |
| 85th | Grenada | 110.58 | -1.7% |
| 86th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 112.37 | -62.1% |
| 87th | St. Lucia | 113.42 | -2.9% |
| 88th | Algeria | 114.30 | -16.4% |
| 89th | Belize | 114.69 | -0.5% |
| 90th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 116.59 | -2.1% |
| 91st | Antigua and Barbuda | 117.76 | 0.7% |
| 92nd | Bahamas, The | 119.09 | -1.2% |
| 93rd | Dominica | 120.25 | -1.4% |
| 94th | Mexico | 123.07 | -23.6% |
| 95th | Saudi Arabia | 123.12 | 20.0% |
| 96th | Sierra Leone | 123.48 | -13.6% |
| 97th | United States | 125.92 | 18.2% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 127.53 | -1.1% |
| 99th | Iceland | 127.70 | 29.2% |
| 100th | United Kingdom | 128.18 | -0.1% |
| 101st | Türkiye | 129.31 | 9.6% |
| 102nd | Gambia, The | 131.60 | -17.0% |
| 103rd | Bahrain | 136.24 | 2.3% |
| 104th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 145.64 | 25.6% |
| 105th | Malawi | 158.27 | 9.1% |
| 106th | Argentina | 226.09 | -54.7% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2002?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2002 was 145.64. This ranked 104th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2002?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 25.6% in 2002 compared to 2001.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2002?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2002 at 226.09.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2002?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2002 was 145.64. This ranked 104th globally.
How does 2002 compare to 2001 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 151.90 in 2001 to 145.64 in 2002, a 25.6% increase.
Related
2001
2003
All years
Full ranking 2002
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking