China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2005
84.92
+16.37 from 2004
China's real effective exchange rate was 84.92 in 2005, increased +16.37 from 85.85 in 2004. This was the 22nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2005▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 72.14 | 2.6% |
| 2nd | Brazil | 73.46 | -21.3% |
| 3rd | Slovak Republic | 76.68 | 3.9% |
| 4th | Paraguay | 76.93 | -6.2% |
| 5th | Trinidad and Tobago | 77.30 | 1.7% |
| 6th | Thailand | 77.82 | 1.3% |
| 7th | Moldova | 79.27 | 2.0% |
| 8th | Philippines | 80.04 | 21.5% |
| 9th | Armenia | 80.09 | 11.8% |
| 10th | Zambia | 80.39 | 23.5% |
| 11th | Serbia | 80.89 | -2.2% |
| 12th | Uruguay | 81.10 | 11.9% |
| 13th | Russian Federation | 81.16 | -13.6% |
| 14th | United Arab Emirates | 81.77 | 2.2% |
| 15th | Bulgaria | 83.05 | 6.5% |
| 16th | Czechia | 83.17 | 4.7% |
| 17th | Lithuania | 83.74 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Latvia | 83.95 | 1.1% |
| 19th | Estonia | 84.32 | 1.2% |
| 20th | Costa Rica | 84.70 | -0.1% |
| 21st | Colombia | 84.79 | -12.8% |
| 22nd | China | 84.92 | 23.9% |
| 23rd | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 85.21 | -2.0% |
| 24th | Nigeria | 86.26 | 14.5% |
| 25th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 87.07 | -5.5% |
| 26th | Israel | 87.58 | 9.8% |
| 27th | Australia | 87.96 | -13.6% |
| 28th | Indonesia | 88.51 | -1.8% |
| 29th | Georgia | 88.80 | 6.5% |
| 30th | Samoa | 88.92 | -1.0% |
| 31st | Burundi | 89.06 | 9.5% |
| 32nd | Papua New Guinea | 89.07 | 0.8% |
| 33rd | Peru | 89.16 | -1.6% |
| 34th | Solomon Islands | 89.22 | 2.2% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 89.64 | 1.9% |
| 36th | Guyana | 89.95 | 2.0% |
| 37th | Canada | 90.54 | -14.5% |
| 38th | Singapore | 90.60 | 4.5% |
| 39th | Sierra Leone | 92.81 | 1.6% |
| 40th | India | 93.24 | 3.2% |
| 41st | Malaysia | 93.30 | -14.5% |
| 42nd | Central African Republic | 93.37 | -0.9% |
| 43rd | Switzerland | 95.48 | 5.5% |
| 44th | Nicaragua | 95.83 | -1.1% |
| 45th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 96.00 | -2.7% |
| 46th | Greece | 96.09 | -11.5% |
| 47th | Hungary | 96.22 | -13.8% |
| 48th | Chile | 96.32 | -8.9% |
| 49th | Croatia | 96.83 | -4.3% |
| 50th | Poland | 97.22 | 1.8% |
| 51st | Romania | 97.48 | 15.6% |
| 52nd | Norway | 99.03 | -19.2% |
| 53rd | Spain | 99.13 | -2.9% |
| 54th | Luxembourg | 99.26 | 1.0% |
| 55th | Japan | 99.46 | -27.3% |
| 56th | Gambia, The | 99.67 | 6.2% |
| 57th | Cameroon | 99.83 | -3.0% |
| 58th | North Macedonia | 100.12 | -1.3% |
| 59th | Denmark | 100.14 | 0.8% |
| 60th | Malawi | 100.51 | 1.8% |
| 61st | Slovenia | 100.57 | -0.9% |
| 62nd | Togo | 100.70 | 1.7% |
| 63rd | Pakistan | 100.98 | 3.0% |
| 64th | Belgium | 101.05 | 2.6% |
| 65th | Côte d'Ivoire | 101.12 | 0.2% |
| 66th | Grenada | 101.16 | -1.1% |
| 67th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 101.34 | -2.0% |
| 68th | Saudi Arabia | 101.53 | 22.0% |
| 69th | Ireland | 101.53 | -11.5% |
| 70th | Malta | 101.60 | -0.3% |
| 71st | St. Lucia | 101.65 | -1.3% |
| 72nd | Algeria | 101.67 | -12.0% |
| 73rd | Gabon | 101.76 | 0.9% |
| 74th | Bahamas, The | 102.05 | -3.7% |
| 75th | Cyprus | 102.38 | -7.5% |
| 76th | Portugal | 102.42 | -2.3% |
| 77th | Italy | 102.83 | -6.2% |
| 78th | Austria | 102.87 | 3.0% |
| 79th | Ukraine | 103.22 | 10.4% |
| 80th | Ghana | 103.56 | 10.0% |
| 81st | Netherlands | 103.81 | -1.0% |
| 82nd | Finland | 103.84 | -3.7% |
| 83rd | France | 104.03 | -6.5% |
| 84th | Morocco | 104.05 | -1.0% |
| 85th | Uganda | 104.13 | 4.7% |
| 86th | South Africa | 104.64 | -26.0% |
| 87th | Germany | 105.22 | -5.0% |
| 88th | New Zealand | 105.75 | 3.8% |
| 89th | Belize | 105.92 | -2.3% |
| 90th | Dominican Republic | 106.86 | 33.6% |
| 91st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 107.09 | -0.3% |
| 92nd | Sweden | 107.18 | -15.6% |
| 93rd | Dominica | 107.91 | -4.4% |
| 94th | Antigua and Barbuda | 108.34 | -2.3% |
| 95th | Bahrain | 109.12 | -5.1% |
| 96th | Mexico | 109.81 | -19.9% |
| 97th | United States | 110.84 | 16.3% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 111.06 | -4.9% |
| 99th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 112.03 | 19.7% |
| 100th | Fiji | 116.88 | -0.5% |
| 101st | United Kingdom | 125.43 | -2.0% |
| 102nd | Korea | 127.02 | 23.3% |
| 103rd | Lesotho | 130.33 | 1.3% |
| 104th | Iceland | 156.98 | 39.6% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 160.28 | 10.0% |
| 106th | Argentina | 215.69 | -1.4% |
FAQ
What was China's real effective exchange rate in 2005?▾
China's real effective exchange rate in 2005 was 84.92. This ranked 22nd globally.
How did China's real effective exchange rate change in 2005?▾
China's real effective exchange rate increased by 23.9% in 2005 compared to 2004.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2005?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2005 at 215.69.
What is the real effective exchange rate of China in 2005?▾
The real effective exchange rate of China in 2005 was 84.92. This ranked 22nd globally.
How does 2005 compare to 2004 for China's real effective exchange rate?▾
China's real effective exchange rate went from 85.85 in 2004 to 84.92 in 2005, a 23.9% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2005. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 14.1%. View full analysis →
Related
2004
2006
All years
Full ranking 2005
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1980
Lowest: 1994
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Malaysia
vs Mexico
vs Nauru
vs Argentina
G20 Real Effective Exchange Rate
BRICS+ Real Effective Exchange Rate
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Real Effective Exchange Rate
Global Ranking