Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2005
112.03
+18.45 from 2004
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 112.03 in 2005, increased +18.45 from 116.10 in 2004. This was the 99th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2005▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 72.14 | 2.6% |
| 2nd | Brazil | 73.46 | -21.3% |
| 3rd | Slovak Republic | 76.68 | 3.9% |
| 4th | Paraguay | 76.93 | -6.2% |
| 5th | Trinidad and Tobago | 77.30 | 1.7% |
| 6th | Thailand | 77.82 | 1.3% |
| 7th | Moldova | 79.27 | 2.0% |
| 8th | Philippines | 80.04 | 21.5% |
| 9th | Armenia | 80.09 | 11.8% |
| 10th | Zambia | 80.39 | 23.5% |
| 11th | Serbia | 80.89 | -2.2% |
| 12th | Uruguay | 81.10 | 11.9% |
| 13th | Russian Federation | 81.16 | -13.6% |
| 14th | United Arab Emirates | 81.77 | 2.2% |
| 15th | Bulgaria | 83.05 | 6.5% |
| 16th | Czechia | 83.17 | 4.7% |
| 17th | Lithuania | 83.74 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Latvia | 83.95 | 1.1% |
| 19th | Estonia | 84.32 | 1.2% |
| 20th | Costa Rica | 84.70 | -0.1% |
| 21st | Colombia | 84.79 | -12.8% |
| 22nd | China | 84.92 | 23.9% |
| 23rd | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 85.21 | -2.0% |
| 24th | Nigeria | 86.26 | 14.5% |
| 25th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 87.07 | -5.5% |
| 26th | Israel | 87.58 | 9.8% |
| 27th | Australia | 87.96 | -13.6% |
| 28th | Indonesia | 88.51 | -1.8% |
| 29th | Georgia | 88.80 | 6.5% |
| 30th | Samoa | 88.92 | -1.0% |
| 31st | Burundi | 89.06 | 9.5% |
| 32nd | Papua New Guinea | 89.07 | 0.8% |
| 33rd | Peru | 89.16 | -1.6% |
| 34th | Solomon Islands | 89.22 | 2.2% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 89.64 | 1.9% |
| 36th | Guyana | 89.95 | 2.0% |
| 37th | Canada | 90.54 | -14.5% |
| 38th | Singapore | 90.60 | 4.5% |
| 39th | Sierra Leone | 92.81 | 1.6% |
| 40th | India | 93.24 | 3.2% |
| 41st | Malaysia | 93.30 | -14.5% |
| 42nd | Central African Republic | 93.37 | -0.9% |
| 43rd | Switzerland | 95.48 | 5.5% |
| 44th | Nicaragua | 95.83 | -1.1% |
| 45th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 96.00 | -2.7% |
| 46th | Greece | 96.09 | -11.5% |
| 47th | Hungary | 96.22 | -13.8% |
| 48th | Chile | 96.32 | -8.9% |
| 49th | Croatia | 96.83 | -4.3% |
| 50th | Poland | 97.22 | 1.8% |
| 51st | Romania | 97.48 | 15.6% |
| 52nd | Norway | 99.03 | -19.2% |
| 53rd | Spain | 99.13 | -2.9% |
| 54th | Luxembourg | 99.26 | 1.0% |
| 55th | Japan | 99.46 | -27.3% |
| 56th | Gambia, The | 99.67 | 6.2% |
| 57th | Cameroon | 99.83 | -3.0% |
| 58th | North Macedonia | 100.12 | -1.3% |
| 59th | Denmark | 100.14 | 0.8% |
| 60th | Malawi | 100.51 | 1.8% |
| 61st | Slovenia | 100.57 | -0.9% |
| 62nd | Togo | 100.70 | 1.7% |
| 63rd | Pakistan | 100.98 | 3.0% |
| 64th | Belgium | 101.05 | 2.6% |
| 65th | Côte d'Ivoire | 101.12 | 0.2% |
| 66th | Grenada | 101.16 | -1.1% |
| 67th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 101.34 | -2.0% |
| 68th | Saudi Arabia | 101.53 | 22.0% |
| 69th | Ireland | 101.53 | -11.5% |
| 70th | Malta | 101.60 | -0.3% |
| 71st | St. Lucia | 101.65 | -1.3% |
| 72nd | Algeria | 101.67 | -12.0% |
| 73rd | Gabon | 101.76 | 0.9% |
| 74th | Bahamas, The | 102.05 | -3.7% |
| 75th | Cyprus | 102.38 | -7.5% |
| 76th | Portugal | 102.42 | -2.3% |
| 77th | Italy | 102.83 | -6.2% |
| 78th | Austria | 102.87 | 3.0% |
| 79th | Ukraine | 103.22 | 10.4% |
| 80th | Ghana | 103.56 | 10.0% |
| 81st | Netherlands | 103.81 | -1.0% |
| 82nd | Finland | 103.84 | -3.7% |
| 83rd | France | 104.03 | -6.5% |
| 84th | Morocco | 104.05 | -1.0% |
| 85th | Uganda | 104.13 | 4.7% |
| 86th | South Africa | 104.64 | -26.0% |
| 87th | Germany | 105.22 | -5.0% |
| 88th | New Zealand | 105.75 | 3.8% |
| 89th | Belize | 105.92 | -2.3% |
| 90th | Dominican Republic | 106.86 | 33.6% |
| 91st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 107.09 | -0.3% |
| 92nd | Sweden | 107.18 | -15.6% |
| 93rd | Dominica | 107.91 | -4.4% |
| 94th | Antigua and Barbuda | 108.34 | -2.3% |
| 95th | Bahrain | 109.12 | -5.1% |
| 96th | Mexico | 109.81 | -19.9% |
| 97th | United States | 110.84 | 16.3% |
| 98th | Tunisia | 111.06 | -4.9% |
| 99th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 112.03 | 19.7% |
| 100th | Fiji | 116.88 | -0.5% |
| 101st | United Kingdom | 125.43 | -2.0% |
| 102nd | Korea | 127.02 | 23.3% |
| 103rd | Lesotho | 130.33 | 1.3% |
| 104th | Iceland | 156.98 | 39.6% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 160.28 | 10.0% |
| 106th | Argentina | 215.69 | -1.4% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2005?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2005 was 112.03. This ranked 99th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2005?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 19.7% in 2005 compared to 2004.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2005?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2005 at 215.69.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2005?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2005 was 112.03. This ranked 99th globally.
How does 2005 compare to 2004 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 116.10 in 2004 to 112.03 in 2005, a 19.7% increase.
Related
2004
2006
All years
Full ranking 2005
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking