Iran, Islamic Republic of - Patent Applications 2009
Iran, Islamic Republic of's patent applications was 12,184 in 2009, decreased +3,219 from 15,403 in 2008. This was the 9th highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Japan | 295,315 | -10.5% |
| 2nd | China | 229,096 | 17.7% |
| 3rd | United States | 224,912 | -2.9% |
| 4th | Korea | 127,316 | 0.2% |
| 5th | Germany | 47,859 | -2.8% |
| 6th | Russian Federation | 25,598 | -7.6% |
| 7th | United Kingdom | 15,985 | -3.3% |
| 8th | France | 14,100 | -3.8% |
| 9th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 12,184 | -20.9% |
| 10th | Italy | 8,814 | 2.6% |
| 11th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 7,956 | 16.2% |
| 12th | India | 7,262 | 13.0% |
| 13th | Canada | 5,067 | 0.1% |
| 14th | Brazil | 4,271 | -0.2% |
| 15th | Spain | 3,596 | -1.0% |
| 16th | Poland | 2,899 | 16.5% |
| 17th | Netherlands | 2,575 | 6.4% |
| 18th | Türkiye | 2,555 | 15.0% |
| 19th | Australia | 2,494 | -11.6% |
| 20th | Ukraine | 2,434 | -13.8% |
| 21st | Austria | 2,263 | -1.5% |
| 22nd | Sweden | 2,186 | -14.2% |
| 23rd | Finland | 1,806 | 0.4% |
| 24th | Belarus | 1,753 | 16.1% |
| 25th | Switzerland | 1,684 | 5.6% |
| 26th | New Zealand | 1,555 | 23.8% |
| 27th | Denmark | 1,518 | -7.1% |
| 28th | Kazakhstan | 1,513 | 2.0% |
| 29th | Israel | 1,387 | -9.2% |
| 30th | Norway | 1,246 | 8.3% |
| 31st | Malaysia | 1,234 | 50.9% |
| 32nd | Romania | 1,054 | 5.9% |
| 33rd | Thailand | 1,025 | 13.6% |
| 34th | Mexico | 822 | 20.0% |
| 35th | South Africa | 822 | -4.4% |
| 36th | Czechia | 789 | 10.8% |
| 37th | Hungary | 757 | 10.8% |
| 38th | Singapore | 750 | -5.4% |
| 39th | Greece | 698 | 11.1% |
| 40th | Belgium | 669 | 16.3% |
| 41st | Argentina | 640 | -20.1% |
| 42nd | Portugal | 571 | 49.9% |
| 43rd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 490 | 1.9% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 415 | 7.5% |
| 45th | Slovenia | 373 | 23.9% |
| 46th | Chile | 343 | -35.4% |
| 47th | Sudan | 332 | -2.4% |
| 48th | Serbia | 319 | -17.4% |
| 49th | Azerbaijan | 264 | 16.8% |
| 50th | Viet Nam | 258 | 26.5% |
| 51st | Georgia | 256 | 15.3% |
| 52nd | Croatia | 250 | -24.2% |
| 53rd | Bulgaria | 242 | -2.8% |
| 54th | Latvia | 240 | 16.5% |
| 55th | Uzbekistan | 238 | -9.2% |
| 56th | Sri Lanka | 202 | 0.5% |
| 57th | Slovak Republic | 176 | 5.4% |
| 58th | Philippines | 172 | -20.4% |
| 59th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 149 | -13.9% |
| 60th | Kyrgyz Republic | 146 | 8.1% |
| 61st | Morocco | 135 | -23.7% |
| 62nd | Moldova | 134 | -50.9% |
| 63rd | Colombia | 128 | 1.6% |
| 64th | Armenia | 116 | -48.7% |
| 65th | Tunisia | 105 | 38.2% |
| 66th | Lithuania | 91 | 4.6% |
| 67th | Estonia | 76 | 22.6% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 76 | -26.2% |
| 69th | Iceland | 64 | 28.0% |
| 70th | Jordan | 60 | 20.0% |
| 71st | Luxembourg | 60 | 25.0% |
| 72nd | Cuba | 59 | -14.5% |
| 73rd | Bangladesh | 55 | -8.3% |
| 74th | Kenya | 48 | -23.8% |
| 75th | North Macedonia | 39 | 14.7% |
| 76th | Peru | 37 | 19.4% |
| 77th | Uruguay | 30 | -9.1% |
| 78th | Dominican Republic | 17 | 112.5% |
| 79th | Jamaica | 17 | 13.3% |
| 80th | Costa Rica | 16 | -33.3% |
| 81st | Paraguay | 15 | 15.4% |
| 82nd | Tajikistan | 11 | -57.7% |
| 83rd | Zambia | 9 | -65.4% |
| 84th | Malta | 8 | -42.9% |
| 85th | Guatemala | 7 | 40.0% |
| 86th | Mozambique | 7 | 250.0% |
| 87th | Cyprus | 6 | -45.5% |
| 88th | Ecuador | 6 | 200.0% |
| 89th | Monaco | 3 | -57.1% |
| 90th | Macao SAR, China | 1 | -66.7% |
| 91st | Madagascar | 1 | -92.9% |
FAQ
Iran, Islamic Republic of's patent applications in 2009 was 12,184. This ranked 9th globally.
Iran, Islamic Republic of's patent applications decreased by 20.9% in 2009 compared to 2008.
Japan had the highest patent applications in 2009 at 295,315.
The patent applications of Iran, Islamic Republic of in 2009 was 12,184. This ranked 9th globally.
Iran, Islamic Republic of's patent applications went from 15,403 in 2008 to 12,184 in 2009, a 20.9% decrease.
Iran, Islamic Republic of matched the Stagflation Risk pattern in 2009. Historically: 307 occurrences, 117 successful (38%). Outcome 24 months later: 26.3%. View full analysis →