Luxembourg - Energy Use per Capita 2019
Luxembourg's energy use per capita was 6,377 in 2019, decreased +37 from 6,414 in 2018. This was the 137th highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | South Sudan | 76 | -1.1% |
| 2nd | Yemen, Republic of | 93 | -1.3% |
| 3rd | Niger | 148 | 1.4% |
| 4th | Chad | 190 | -5.1% |
| 5th | Bangladesh | 273 | 6.0% |
| 6th | Eritrea | 285 | 0.7% |
| 7th | Senegal | 299 | 8.8% |
| 8th | Burkina Faso | 302 | 0.8% |
| 9th | Madagascar | 314 | 7.2% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 330 | 10.2% |
| 11th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 335 | -1.5% |
| 12th | Ghana | 354 | 1.1% |
| 13th | Rwanda | 357 | 0.5% |
| 14th | Mozambique | 360 | -1.8% |
| 15th | Côte d'Ivoire | 364 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 371 | 6.6% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 387 | -1.3% |
| 18th | Haiti | 410 | -2.3% |
| 19th | Zimbabwe | 412 | -7.4% |
| 20th | Togo | 414 | 0.7% |
| 21st | Benin | 415 | -2.1% |
| 22nd | Tanzania | 415 | 2.9% |
| 23rd | Angola | 417 | 2.9% |
| 24th | Myanmar | 426 | -0.7% |
| 25th | Pakistan | 432 | -4.9% |
| 26th | Sudan | 435 | 0.1% |
| 27th | Uganda | 455 | -2.8% |
| 28th | Nepal | 483 | -4.3% |
| 29th | Cambodia | 489 | 11.0% |
| 30th | Sri Lanka | 523 | 2.9% |
| 31st | Kenya | 544 | -0.5% |
| 32nd | Philippines | 552 | -0.5% |
| 33rd | Syrian Arab Republic | 554 | -0.5% |
| 34th | Congo, Republic of | 583 | 5.5% |
| 35th | Honduras | 584 | 3.3% |
| 36th | Kyrgyz Republic | 610 | -13.7% |
| 37th | Morocco | 615 | 6.5% |
| 38th | Nicaragua | 616 | -0.1% |
| 39th | India | 667 | -0.2% |
| 40th | Namibia | 718 | -2.0% |
| 41st | El Salvador | 735 | 5.8% |
| 42nd | Zambia | 742 | 2.1% |
| 43rd | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 764 | 9.0% |
| 44th | Lao PDR | 783 | -2.9% |
| 45th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 796 | -0.9% |
| 46th | Peru | 798 | 1.9% |
| 47th | Jordan | 812 | -6.6% |
| 48th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 845 | -3.0% |
| 49th | Indonesia | 845 | 2.3% |
| 50th | Guatemala | 852 | 2.1% |
| 51st | Cuba | 866 | -1.6% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 890 | 9.0% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 904 | 4.0% |
| 54th | Albania | 908 | 0.4% |
| 55th | Dominican Republic | 939 | 9.0% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 951 | -2.3% |
| 57th | Viet Nam | 987 | 11.5% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 997 | 4.9% |
| 59th | Eswatini | 1,023 | 3.4% |
| 60th | Jamaica | 1,076 | 4.3% |
| 61st | Paraguay | 1,106 | -2.2% |
| 62nd | Panama | 1,163 | 13.3% |
| 63rd | Armenia | 1,163 | 8.5% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,163 | 1.8% |
| 65th | Botswana | 1,242 | -7.6% |
| 66th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,274 | -9.6% |
| 67th | Uzbekistan | 1,285 | 1.0% |
| 68th | Iraq | 1,319 | 2.5% |
| 69th | Georgia | 1,371 | 5.3% |
| 70th | Brazil | 1,416 | 0.9% |
| 71st | Malta | 1,440 | 2.3% |
| 72nd | Algeria | 1,464 | 1.5% |
| 73rd | Mexico | 1,470 | -1.6% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,486 | 3.8% |
| 75th | Moldova | 1,500 | 0.3% |
| 76th | North Macedonia | 1,504 | 9.7% |
| 77th | Uruguay | 1,541 | -1.3% |
| 78th | Azerbaijan | 1,588 | 7.9% |
| 79th | Romania | 1,705 | -0.7% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,731 | 13.6% |
| 81st | Montenegro | 1,738 | 3.5% |
| 82nd | Cyprus | 1,758 | -0.9% |
| 83rd | Türkiye | 1,774 | 0.2% |
| 84th | Argentina | 1,777 | -1.6% |
| 85th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,877 | -2.1% |
| 86th | Ukraine | 1,988 | -3.9% |
| 87th | Thailand | 1,990 | 1.9% |
| 88th | Mongolia | 2,018 | 13.9% |
| 89th | Greece | 2,059 | -1.5% |
| 90th | Portugal | 2,115 | -1.2% |
| 91st | Chile | 2,154 | 4.2% |
| 92nd | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2,158 | -2.2% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,173 | 2.1% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,202 | 0.1% |
| 95th | Gabon | 2,206 | -3.9% |
| 96th | South Africa | 2,232 | 2.2% |
| 97th | Latvia | 2,344 | -2.5% |
| 98th | China | 2,398 | 3.8% |
| 99th | Israel | 2,408 | -3.3% |
| 100th | Italy | 2,494 | -0.4% |
| 101st | United Kingdom | 2,516 | -4.4% |
| 102nd | Spain | 2,574 | -3.5% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,708 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Ireland | 2,748 | -2.6% |
| 105th | Belarus | 2,749 | -3.5% |
| 106th | Hungary | 2,749 | 0.4% |
| 107th | Denmark | 2,757 | -3.9% |
| 108th | Poland | 2,761 | -3.6% |
| 109th | Bulgaria | 2,771 | 0.2% |
| 110th | Switzerland | 2,857 | 1.8% |
| 111th | Malaysia | 2,878 | 1.4% |
| 112th | Slovak Republic | 3,128 | -4.3% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,150 | -1.9% |
| 114th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3,189 | 9.5% |
| 115th | Japan | 3,262 | -2.4% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,267 | -2.2% |
| 117th | Libya | 3,414 | 11.7% |
| 118th | Turkmenistan | 3,466 | 1.1% |
| 119th | Germany | 3,571 | -2.4% |
| 120th | France | 3,606 | -1.7% |
| 121st | Estonia | 3,661 | -14.5% |
| 122nd | Kazakhstan | 3,753 | -1.6% |
| 123rd | Austria | 3,766 | 1.3% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,002 | -1.9% |
| 125th | Netherlands | 4,129 | -2.9% |
| 126th | New Zealand | 4,171 | 1.5% |
| 127th | Belgium | 4,776 | 2.5% |
| 128th | Sweden | 4,782 | -3.7% |
| 129th | Russian Federation | 5,065 | -3.7% |
| 130th | Oman | 5,104 | -7.9% |
| 131st | Norway | 5,221 | -5.7% |
| 132nd | Australia | 5,232 | 2.9% |
| 133rd | Korea | 5,335 | -3.6% |
| 134th | Singapore | 5,566 | -2.2% |
| 135th | Curaçao | 5,972 | -37.1% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,025 | -2.3% |
| 137th | Luxembourg | 6,377 | -0.6% |
| 138th | United States | 6,701 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Gibraltar | 7,477 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Saudi Arabia | 7,668 | 0.2% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,126 | -0.4% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 8,353 | -14.5% |
| 143rd | United Arab Emirates | 8,817 | 3.9% |
| 144th | Brunei Darussalam | 9,220 | 11.0% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 10,388 | 9.0% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 12,540 | 1.2% |
| 147th | Qatar | 15,761 | -2.3% |
| 148th | Iceland | 16,701 | -3.7% |
FAQ
Luxembourg's energy use per capita in 2019 was 6,377. This ranked 137th globally.
Luxembourg's energy use per capita decreased by 0.6% in 2019 compared to 2018.
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2019 at 16,701.
The energy use per capita of Luxembourg in 2019 was 6,377. This ranked 137th globally.
Luxembourg's energy use per capita went from 6,414 in 2018 to 6,377 in 2019, a 0.6% decrease.
Luxembourg matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2019. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 6.9%. View full analysis →