South Sudan - Energy Use per Capita 2019
76
−1 from 2018
South Sudan's energy use per capita was 76 in 2019, decreased +1 from 77 in 2018. This was the 1st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2019▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | South Sudan | 76 | -1.1% |
| 2nd | Yemen, Republic of | 93 | -1.3% |
| 3rd | Niger | 148 | 1.4% |
| 4th | Chad | 190 | -5.1% |
| 5th | Bangladesh | 273 | 6.0% |
| 6th | Eritrea | 285 | 0.7% |
| 7th | Senegal | 299 | 8.8% |
| 8th | Burkina Faso | 302 | 0.8% |
| 9th | Madagascar | 314 | 7.2% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 330 | 10.2% |
| 11th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 335 | -1.5% |
| 12th | Ghana | 354 | 1.1% |
| 13th | Rwanda | 357 | 0.5% |
| 14th | Mozambique | 360 | -1.8% |
| 15th | Côte d'Ivoire | 364 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 371 | 6.6% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 387 | -1.3% |
| 18th | Haiti | 410 | -2.3% |
| 19th | Zimbabwe | 412 | -7.4% |
| 20th | Togo | 414 | 0.7% |
| 21st | Benin | 415 | -2.1% |
| 22nd | Tanzania | 415 | 2.9% |
| 23rd | Angola | 417 | 2.9% |
| 24th | Myanmar | 426 | -0.7% |
| 25th | Pakistan | 432 | -4.9% |
| 26th | Sudan | 435 | 0.1% |
| 27th | Uganda | 455 | -2.8% |
| 28th | Nepal | 483 | -4.3% |
| 29th | Cambodia | 489 | 11.0% |
| 30th | Sri Lanka | 523 | 2.9% |
| 31st | Kenya | 544 | -0.5% |
| 32nd | Philippines | 552 | -0.5% |
| 33rd | Syrian Arab Republic | 554 | -0.5% |
| 34th | Congo, Republic of | 583 | 5.5% |
| 35th | Honduras | 584 | 3.3% |
| 36th | Kyrgyz Republic | 610 | -13.7% |
| 37th | Morocco | 615 | 6.5% |
| 38th | Nicaragua | 616 | -0.1% |
| 39th | India | 667 | -0.2% |
| 40th | Namibia | 718 | -2.0% |
| 41st | El Salvador | 735 | 5.8% |
| 42nd | Zambia | 742 | 2.1% |
| 43rd | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 764 | 9.0% |
| 44th | Lao PDR | 783 | -2.9% |
| 45th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 796 | -0.9% |
| 46th | Peru | 798 | 1.9% |
| 47th | Jordan | 812 | -6.6% |
| 48th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 845 | -3.0% |
| 49th | Indonesia | 845 | 2.3% |
| 50th | Guatemala | 852 | 2.1% |
| 51st | Cuba | 866 | -1.6% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 890 | 9.0% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 904 | 4.0% |
| 54th | Albania | 908 | 0.4% |
| 55th | Dominican Republic | 939 | 9.0% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 951 | -2.3% |
| 57th | Viet Nam | 987 | 11.5% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 997 | 4.9% |
| 59th | Eswatini | 1,023 | 3.4% |
| 60th | Jamaica | 1,076 | 4.3% |
| 61st | Paraguay | 1,106 | -2.2% |
| 62nd | Panama | 1,163 | 13.3% |
| 63rd | Armenia | 1,163 | 8.5% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,163 | 1.8% |
| 65th | Botswana | 1,242 | -7.6% |
| 66th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,274 | -9.6% |
| 67th | Uzbekistan | 1,285 | 1.0% |
| 68th | Iraq | 1,319 | 2.5% |
| 69th | Georgia | 1,371 | 5.3% |
| 70th | Brazil | 1,416 | 0.9% |
| 71st | Malta | 1,440 | 2.3% |
| 72nd | Algeria | 1,464 | 1.5% |
| 73rd | Mexico | 1,470 | -1.6% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,486 | 3.8% |
| 75th | Moldova | 1,500 | 0.3% |
| 76th | North Macedonia | 1,504 | 9.7% |
| 77th | Uruguay | 1,541 | -1.3% |
| 78th | Azerbaijan | 1,588 | 7.9% |
| 79th | Romania | 1,705 | -0.7% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,731 | 13.6% |
| 81st | Montenegro | 1,738 | 3.5% |
| 82nd | Cyprus | 1,758 | -0.9% |
| 83rd | Türkiye | 1,774 | 0.2% |
| 84th | Argentina | 1,777 | -1.6% |
| 85th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,877 | -2.1% |
| 86th | Ukraine | 1,988 | -3.9% |
| 87th | Thailand | 1,990 | 1.9% |
| 88th | Mongolia | 2,018 | 13.9% |
| 89th | Greece | 2,059 | -1.5% |
| 90th | Portugal | 2,115 | -1.2% |
| 91st | Chile | 2,154 | 4.2% |
| 92nd | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 2,158 | -2.2% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,173 | 2.1% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,202 | 0.1% |
| 95th | Gabon | 2,206 | -3.9% |
| 96th | South Africa | 2,232 | 2.2% |
| 97th | Latvia | 2,344 | -2.5% |
| 98th | China | 2,398 | 3.8% |
| 99th | Israel | 2,408 | -3.3% |
| 100th | Italy | 2,494 | -0.4% |
| 101st | United Kingdom | 2,516 | -4.4% |
| 102nd | Spain | 2,574 | -3.5% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,708 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Ireland | 2,748 | -2.6% |
| 105th | Belarus | 2,749 | -3.5% |
| 106th | Hungary | 2,749 | 0.4% |
| 107th | Denmark | 2,757 | -3.9% |
| 108th | Poland | 2,761 | -3.6% |
| 109th | Bulgaria | 2,771 | 0.2% |
| 110th | Switzerland | 2,857 | 1.8% |
| 111th | Malaysia | 2,878 | 1.4% |
| 112th | Slovak Republic | 3,128 | -4.3% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,150 | -1.9% |
| 114th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3,189 | 9.5% |
| 115th | Japan | 3,262 | -2.4% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,267 | -2.2% |
| 117th | Libya | 3,414 | 11.7% |
| 118th | Turkmenistan | 3,466 | 1.1% |
| 119th | Germany | 3,571 | -2.4% |
| 120th | France | 3,606 | -1.7% |
| 121st | Estonia | 3,661 | -14.5% |
| 122nd | Kazakhstan | 3,753 | -1.6% |
| 123rd | Austria | 3,766 | 1.3% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,002 | -1.9% |
| 125th | Netherlands | 4,129 | -2.9% |
| 126th | New Zealand | 4,171 | 1.5% |
| 127th | Belgium | 4,776 | 2.5% |
| 128th | Sweden | 4,782 | -3.7% |
| 129th | Russian Federation | 5,065 | -3.7% |
| 130th | Oman | 5,104 | -7.9% |
| 131st | Norway | 5,221 | -5.7% |
| 132nd | Australia | 5,232 | 2.9% |
| 133rd | Korea | 5,335 | -3.6% |
| 134th | Singapore | 5,566 | -2.2% |
| 135th | Curaçao | 5,972 | -37.1% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,025 | -2.3% |
| 137th | Luxembourg | 6,377 | -0.6% |
| 138th | United States | 6,701 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Gibraltar | 7,477 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Saudi Arabia | 7,668 | 0.2% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,126 | -0.4% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 8,353 | -14.5% |
| 143rd | United Arab Emirates | 8,817 | 3.9% |
| 144th | Brunei Darussalam | 9,220 | 11.0% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 10,388 | 9.0% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 12,540 | 1.2% |
| 147th | Qatar | 15,761 | -2.3% |
| 148th | Iceland | 16,701 | -3.7% |
FAQ
What was South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2019?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2019 was 76. This ranked 1st globally.
How did South Sudan's energy use per capita change in 2019?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita decreased by 1.1% in 2019 compared to 2018.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2019?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2019 at 16,701.
What is the energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2019?▾
The energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2019 was 76. This ranked 1st globally.
How does 2019 compare to 2018 for South Sudan's energy use per capita?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita went from 77 in 2018 to 76 in 2019, a 1.1% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
South Sudan matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2019. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 10.5%. View full analysis →
Related
2018
2020
All years
Full ranking 2019
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2018
Lowest: 2012
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Yemen, Republic of
vs Afghanistan
vs Burundi
vs Eritrea
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking