Macao SAR, China - Control of Corruption 2004
1.40
+0.55 from 2003
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption was 1.40 in 2004, increased +0.55 from 0.85 in 2003. This was the 20th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2004▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Finland | 2.41 | 1.5% |
| 2nd | Denmark | 2.41 | 2.0% |
| 3rd | New Zealand | 2.35 | 3.0% |
| 4th | Singapore | 2.30 | 6.1% |
| 5th | Iceland | 2.17 | -2.7% |
| 6th | Sweden | 2.13 | -0.7% |
| 7th | Austria | 2.03 | 3.2% |
| 8th | Australia | 2.01 | 5.8% |
| 9th | Switzerland | 1.99 | -1.4% |
| 10th | Netherlands | 1.98 | -1.0% |
| 11th | Norway | 1.91 | -4.9% |
| 12th | United Kingdom | 1.91 | -3.6% |
| 13th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1.85 | 2.7% |
| 14th | Germany | 1.84 | -1.9% |
| 15th | Luxembourg | 1.82 | 10.9% |
| 16th | United States | 1.81 | 6.2% |
| 17th | Canada | 1.81 | -6.5% |
| 18th | Bahamas, The | 1.41 | 0.2% |
| 19th | Barbados | 1.41 | -5.9% |
| 20th | Macao SAR, China | 1.40 | 63.9% |
| 21st | Belgium | 1.36 | -1.1% |
| 22nd | Liechtenstein | 1.35 | 1.5% |
| 23rd | Spain | 1.34 | -0.9% |
| 24th | France | 1.31 | 0.4% |
| 25th | Bermuda | 1.31 | -2.0% |
| 26th | Chile | 1.31 | 11.9% |
| 27th | Ireland | 1.27 | -10.1% |
| 28th | Cayman Islands | 1.26 | -5.5% |
| 29th | Puerto Rico (US) | 1.26 | -5.5% |
| 30th | Japan | 1.20 | 2.6% |
| 31st | Aruba | 1.17 | - |
| 32nd | Portugal | 1.13 | 0.6% |
| 33rd | Andorra | 1.12 | -16.0% |
| 34th | United Arab Emirates | 1.04 | 25.8% |
| 35th | Slovenia | 1.02 | 13.0% |
| 36th | Estonia | 0.98 | 6.5% |
| 37th | Israel | 0.91 | -15.9% |
| 38th | Uruguay | 0.89 | -18.8% |
| 39th | Bhutan | 0.89 | -17.8% |
| 40th | Botswana | 0.88 | -29.7% |
| 41st | Cyprus | 0.87 | -26.8% |
| 42nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.84 | -1.7% |
| 43rd | Malta | 0.83 | -9.5% |
| 44th | American Samoa | 0.79 | - |
| 45th | Tuvalu | 0.79 | - |
| 46th | Kuwait | 0.77 | 0.5% |
| 47th | Dominica | 0.76 | -11.1% |
| 48th | Grenada | 0.76 | -11.1% |
| 49th | Hungary | 0.67 | 4.6% |
| 50th | Oman | 0.66 | 17.2% |
| 51st | Virgin Islands (US) | 0.65 | - |
| 52nd | Seychelles | 0.55 | -30.6% |
| 53rd | Kiribati | 0.51 | - |
| 54th | Qatar | 0.50 | -0.6% |
| 55th | Greece | 0.45 | 23.9% |
| 56th | Bahrain | 0.44 | 16.7% |
| 57th | South Africa | 0.40 | 44.4% |
| 58th | Brunei Darussalam | 0.39 | 33.8% |
| 59th | Czechia | 0.38 | -21.5% |
| 60th | Korea | 0.38 | -30.5% |
| 61st | Guam | 0.37 | - |
| 62nd | Lithuania | 0.37 | 4.7% |
| 63rd | Italy | 0.36 | -25.4% |
| 64th | Cabo Verde | 0.34 | -29.2% |
| 65th | Slovak Republic | 0.34 | 20.1% |
| 66th | Micronesia, Federated States of | 0.32 | - |
| 67th | Malaysia | 0.32 | 2.4% |
| 68th | Jordan | 0.29 | -12.9% |
| 69th | Fiji | 0.29 | 5.1% |
| 70th | Costa Rica | 0.28 | -44.8% |
| 71st | St. Lucia | 0.28 | - |
| 72nd | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.28 | - |
| 73rd | Suriname | 0.26 | -14.1% |
| 74th | Croatia | 0.24 | -7.4% |
| 75th | Cuba | 0.22 | -1.1% |
| 76th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 0.20 | - |
| 77th | Latvia | 0.15 | -36.9% |
| 78th | Mauritius | 0.15 | -20.8% |
| 79th | Namibia | 0.12 | -39.1% |
| 80th | Poland | 0.11 | -73.6% |
| 81st | Tonga | 0.09 | - |
| 82nd | Bulgaria | 0.07 | 178.1% |
| 83rd | Tunisia | 0.07 | -45.1% |
| 84th | Senegal | 0.02 | 116.4% |
| 85th | Trinidad and Tobago | -0.02 | -131.3% |
| 86th | West Bank and Gaza | -0.02 | 94.4% |
| 87th | Brazil | -0.03 | -130.2% |
| 88th | Solomon Islands | -0.07 | -130.7% |
| 89th | Belize | -0.10 | -0.7% |
| 90th | Lesotho | -0.11 | 37.2% |
| 91st | Vanuatu | -0.14 | -152.8% |
| 92nd | Colombia | -0.14 | 31.2% |
| 93rd | Eritrea | -0.15 | -205.4% |
| 94th | Burkina Faso | -0.15 | -38.6% |
| 95th | Sri Lanka | -0.17 | 38.5% |
| 96th | Türkiye | -0.19 | 8.2% |
| 97th | Samoa | -0.24 | -131.0% |
| 98th | Eswatini | -0.24 | -231.6% |
| 99th | Morocco | -0.24 | 23.8% |
| 100th | Thailand | -0.25 | -25.6% |
| 101st | Mongolia | -0.27 | -21.4% |
| 102nd | Ghana | -0.28 | 10.2% |
| 103rd | Maldives | -0.28 | -270.4% |
| 104th | Saudi Arabia | -0.30 | -77.6% |
| 105th | Panama | -0.30 | 24.0% |
| 106th | Kosovo | -0.31 | 39.5% |
| 107th | Romania | -0.32 | 21.5% |
| 108th | Madagascar | -0.32 | -55.3% |
| 109th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.32 | -15.1% |
| 110th | Timor-Leste | -0.34 | -34.2% |
| 111th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | -0.36 | -15.5% |
| 112th | Mauritania | -0.37 | -391.1% |
| 113th | Mexico | -0.39 | -61.2% |
| 114th | Jamaica | -0.39 | 9.6% |
| 115th | Guyana | -0.40 | -11.9% |
| 116th | Rwanda | -0.41 | 29.9% |
| 117th | Argentina | -0.41 | 13.7% |
| 118th | Djibouti | -0.43 | 33.8% |
| 119th | Peru | -0.43 | -177.7% |
| 120th | Nicaragua | -0.45 | 17.6% |
| 121st | India | -0.45 | 1.7% |
| 122nd | Georgia | -0.46 | 29.4% |
| 123rd | São Tomé and Principe | -0.46 | -323.4% |
| 124th | Montenegro | -0.47 | -13.5% |
| 125th | El Salvador | -0.48 | -15.3% |
| 126th | Serbia | -0.49 | 0.2% |
| 127th | Gambia, The | -0.52 | -195.9% |
| 128th | North Macedonia | -0.55 | 14.9% |
| 129th | Benin | -0.56 | 2.5% |
| 130th | China | -0.57 | -43.0% |
| 131st | Tanzania | -0.57 | 23.0% |
| 132nd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | -0.58 | -9.9% |
| 133rd | Dominican Republic | -0.59 | 18.7% |
| 134th | Lebanon | -0.59 | 3.2% |
| 135th | Zambia | -0.60 | 5.8% |
| 136th | Mozambique | -0.61 | 4.5% |
| 137th | Guatemala | -0.62 | 15.9% |
| 138th | Mali | -0.68 | 9.0% |
| 139th | Algeria | -0.70 | 2.2% |
| 140th | Armenia | -0.70 | -8.4% |
| 141st | Philippines | -0.71 | -11.4% |
| 142nd | Albania | -0.72 | 15.2% |
| 143rd | Ecuador | -0.73 | 0.2% |
| 144th | Viet Nam | -0.76 | -54.1% |
| 145th | Belarus | -0.76 | -41.3% |
| 146th | Malawi | -0.80 | -5.6% |
| 147th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | -0.81 | 5.2% |
| 148th | Uganda | -0.81 | 14.4% |
| 149th | Russian Federation | -0.83 | -5.4% |
| 150th | Gabon | -0.83 | -49.3% |
| 151st | Syrian Arab Republic | -0.83 | -3.4% |
| 152nd | Comoros | -0.86 | -24.6% |
| 153rd | Sierra Leone | -0.88 | 1.3% |
| 154th | Niger | -0.89 | 3.2% |
| 155th | Guinea | -0.89 | 0.1% |
| 156th | Kenya | -0.90 | 6.9% |
| 157th | Libya | -0.92 | -3.3% |
| 158th | Togo | -0.94 | -4.6% |
| 159th | Honduras | -0.95 | 2.9% |
| 160th | Nepal | -0.95 | -61.9% |
| 161st | Indonesia | -0.98 | 0.3% |
| 162nd | Burundi | -0.98 | -11.9% |
| 163rd | Ukraine | -0.98 | -1.3% |
| 164th | Papua New Guinea | -1.00 | -22.4% |
| 165th | Congo, Republic of | -1.04 | 4.9% |
| 166th | Moldova | -1.04 | -17.6% |
| 167th | Cambodia | -1.06 | -6.9% |
| 168th | Uzbekistan | -1.07 | -16.8% |
| 169th | Yemen, Republic of | -1.09 | -8.7% |
| 170th | Kyrgyz Republic | -1.10 | -6.3% |
| 171st | Kazakhstan | -1.11 | -7.7% |
| 172nd | Cameroon | -1.13 | -14.7% |
| 173rd | Lao PDR | -1.15 | -32.5% |
| 174th | Pakistan | -1.18 | -46.5% |
| 175th | Azerbaijan | -1.18 | -12.9% |
| 176th | Côte d'Ivoire | -1.24 | -22.4% |
| 177th | Sudan | -1.25 | -6.6% |
| 178th | Zimbabwe | -1.25 | -5.4% |
| 179th | Turkmenistan | -1.27 | -25.2% |
| 180th | Guinea-Bissau | -1.27 | -13.1% |
| 181st | Tajikistan | -1.32 | -14.9% |
| 182nd | Liberia | -1.33 | -15.4% |
| 183rd | Afghanistan | -1.35 | -0.5% |
| 184th | Angola | -1.38 | -3.2% |
| 185th | Equatorial Guinea | -1.38 | -8.2% |
| 186th | Nigeria | -1.38 | 2.4% |
| 187th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | -1.39 | 3.2% |
| 188th | Paraguay | -1.43 | 0.7% |
| 189th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -1.44 | 5.4% |
| 190th | Chad | -1.45 | 1.1% |
| 191st | Haiti | -1.46 | 7.9% |
| 192nd | Central African Republic | -1.48 | -44.7% |
| 193rd | Iraq | -1.49 | -23.2% |
| 194th | Bangladesh | -1.60 | -3.6% |
| 195th | Myanmar | -1.65 | -12.0% |
| 196th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | -1.80 | -23.0% |
FAQ
What was Macao SAR, China's control of corruption in 2004?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption in 2004 was 1.40. This ranked 20th globally.
How did Macao SAR, China's control of corruption change in 2004?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption increased by 63.9% in 2004 compared to 2003.
Which country had the highest control of corruption in 2004?▾
Finland had the highest control of corruption in 2004 at 2.41.
What is the control of corruption of Macao SAR, China in 2004?▾
The control of corruption of Macao SAR, China in 2004 was 1.40. This ranked 20th globally.
How does 2004 compare to 2003 for Macao SAR, China's control of corruption?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption went from 0.85 in 2003 to 1.40 in 2004, a 63.9% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Macao SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2004. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 13.4%. View full analysis →
Related
2003
2005
All years
Full ranking 2004
Political Stability
Government Effectiveness
Regulatory Quality
Rule of Law
Voice and Accountability
Peak: 2004
Lowest: 2002
Control of Corruption 1990s
Control of Corruption 2000s
Control of Corruption 2010s
Control of Corruption 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Channel Islands
vs Faroe Islands
vs Denmark
vs Netherlands
Global Ranking