Macao SAR, China - Regulatory Quality 2010
1.35
+0.07 from 2009
Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality was 1.35 in 2010, increased +0.07 from 1.28 in 2009. This was the 26th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2010▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1.87 | 3.2% |
| 2nd | Denmark | 1.87 | -0.3% |
| 3rd | Finland | 1.87 | 3.5% |
| 4th | New Zealand | 1.81 | -0.6% |
| 5th | Singapore | 1.78 | 0.4% |
| 6th | United Kingdom | 1.73 | 9.4% |
| 7th | Netherlands | 1.73 | 1.9% |
| 8th | Australia | 1.70 | -6.7% |
| 9th | Canada | 1.69 | -0.2% |
| 10th | Luxembourg | 1.67 | 1.9% |
| 11th | Sweden | 1.66 | 0.4% |
| 12th | Switzerland | 1.62 | 4.6% |
| 13th | Ireland | 1.62 | -4.6% |
| 14th | Germany | 1.57 | 3.6% |
| 15th | Liechtenstein | 1.53 | 0.8% |
| 16th | Norway | 1.51 | 3.2% |
| 17th | Austria | 1.45 | 0.0% |
| 18th | United States | 1.44 | 3.3% |
| 19th | Malta | 1.43 | 4.7% |
| 20th | Cyprus | 1.42 | 4.5% |
| 21st | Chile | 1.42 | -0.9% |
| 22nd | Andorra | 1.39 | -1.2% |
| 23rd | Bermuda | 1.39 | -1.2% |
| 24th | Estonia | 1.39 | -0.3% |
| 25th | Greenland | 1.36 | 1.0% |
| 26th | Macao SAR, China | 1.35 | 5.4% |
| 27th | Aruba | 1.34 | 4.3% |
| 28th | France | 1.31 | 7.9% |
| 29th | Czechia | 1.30 | -0.9% |
| 30th | Belgium | 1.28 | -2.1% |
| 31st | Israel | 1.21 | 10.5% |
| 32nd | Spain | 1.16 | -2.4% |
| 33rd | Cayman Islands | 1.16 | -0.5% |
| 34th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 1.14 | -1.2% |
| 35th | Brunei Darussalam | 1.11 | 2.1% |
| 36th | Poland | 1.02 | 4.8% |
| 37th | Japan | 1.02 | -7.3% |
| 38th | Hungary | 1.01 | -6.2% |
| 39th | Slovak Republic | 1.00 | -4.7% |
| 40th | Lithuania | 0.96 | 0.9% |
| 41st | Latvia | 0.93 | 0.6% |
| 42nd | Iceland | 0.92 | -9.2% |
| 43rd | Korea | 0.92 | 8.1% |
| 44th | Italy | 0.89 | -7.5% |
| 45th | Puerto Rico (US) | 0.86 | -3.6% |
| 46th | Mauritius | 0.80 | 6.1% |
| 47th | Slovenia | 0.76 | -16.9% |
| 48th | Portugal | 0.72 | -27.4% |
| 49th | Bahrain | 0.71 | 2.8% |
| 50th | Bulgaria | 0.68 | -2.1% |
| 51st | Romania | 0.67 | 8.9% |
| 52nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.64 | -1.6% |
| 53rd | Guam | 0.64 | -1.6% |
| 54th | Virgin Islands (US) | 0.64 | -1.6% |
| 55th | Greece | 0.64 | -23.0% |
| 56th | Malaysia | 0.61 | 126.6% |
| 57th | Uruguay | 0.60 | 18.5% |
| 58th | Qatar | 0.60 | -12.6% |
| 59th | Georgia | 0.59 | 15.3% |
| 60th | Costa Rica | 0.59 | 13.1% |
| 61st | Botswana | 0.58 | -4.7% |
| 62nd | Bahamas, The | 0.55 | -31.5% |
| 63rd | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.54 | -5.6% |
| 64th | Barbados | 0.51 | -13.6% |
| 65th | Croatia | 0.49 | 3.6% |
| 66th | Panama | 0.47 | 19.0% |
| 67th | South Africa | 0.45 | -0.8% |
| 68th | Oman | 0.44 | -15.9% |
| 69th | American Samoa | 0.39 | -2.1% |
| 70th | Peru | 0.39 | 7.1% |
| 71st | Dominica | 0.35 | -30.1% |
| 72nd | St. Lucia | 0.35 | -30.1% |
| 73rd | El Salvador | 0.34 | 18.9% |
| 74th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.32 | -35.3% |
| 75th | United Arab Emirates | 0.32 | -28.1% |
| 76th | Türkiye | 0.31 | 8.4% |
| 77th | Grenada | 0.27 | 13.7% |
| 78th | Armenia | 0.27 | -1.6% |
| 79th | Brazil | 0.25 | 93.3% |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 0.24 | 22.0% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 0.23 | 7.0% |
| 82nd | Albania | 0.23 | -3.4% |
| 83rd | Jordan | 0.23 | -18.9% |
| 84th | Namibia | 0.21 | -11.5% |
| 85th | West Bank and Gaza | 0.21 | 201.7% |
| 86th | Saudi Arabia | 0.16 | -0.1% |
| 87th | Kuwait | 0.16 | 3.7% |
| 88th | Colombia | 0.16 | 78.1% |
| 89th | Mexico | 0.16 | -12.0% |
| 90th | Thailand | 0.06 | -49.1% |
| 91st | Ghana | 0.05 | 43.9% |
| 92nd | Lebanon | 0.02 | 122.0% |
| 93rd | Montenegro | -0.01 | -124.7% |
| 94th | Seychelles | -0.02 | -156.4% |
| 95th | Serbia | -0.07 | 64.1% |
| 96th | Tunisia | -0.09 | -1,298.9% |
| 97th | Kosovo | -0.10 | -257.2% |
| 98th | Dominican Republic | -0.12 | 29.0% |
| 99th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.12 | -8.3% |
| 100th | Morocco | -0.12 | -32.0% |
| 101st | Moldova | -0.13 | 8.2% |
| 102nd | Kenya | -0.14 | 23.5% |
| 103rd | Cabo Verde | -0.15 | -162.4% |
| 104th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | -0.15 | 17.0% |
| 105th | Guatemala | -0.17 | 20.5% |
| 106th | Uganda | -0.20 | -4.3% |
| 107th | Burkina Faso | -0.21 | -47.0% |
| 108th | Philippines | -0.22 | -91.3% |
| 109th | Rwanda | -0.24 | 28.6% |
| 110th | Honduras | -0.25 | 20.5% |
| 111th | Sri Lanka | -0.25 | 15.9% |
| 112th | Mongolia | -0.26 | 15.7% |
| 113th | Kyrgyz Republic | -0.26 | 21.5% |
| 114th | Samoa | -0.27 | -11.6% |
| 115th | Kazakhstan | -0.28 | -5.5% |
| 116th | Nicaragua | -0.30 | 30.5% |
| 117th | Russian Federation | -0.31 | -7.7% |
| 118th | Senegal | -0.32 | 2.1% |
| 119th | China | -0.32 | -7.7% |
| 120th | Belize | -0.34 | 9.0% |
| 121st | Paraguay | -0.36 | 11.6% |
| 122nd | Indonesia | -0.38 | -21.0% |
| 123rd | Maldives | -0.38 | -0.8% |
| 124th | Azerbaijan | -0.39 | -23.9% |
| 125th | Eswatini | -0.40 | -7.2% |
| 126th | Benin | -0.40 | -0.8% |
| 127th | India | -0.41 | -17.4% |
| 128th | Gabon | -0.44 | 8.8% |
| 129th | Mozambique | -0.45 | -3.7% |
| 130th | Ukraine | -0.45 | 18.7% |
| 131st | Tanzania | -0.46 | 1.8% |
| 132nd | Gambia, The | -0.48 | -16.5% |
| 133rd | Mali | -0.48 | -18.4% |
| 134th | Cambodia | -0.49 | 0.9% |
| 135th | Zambia | -0.52 | 3.3% |
| 136th | Fiji | -0.56 | 41.9% |
| 137th | Niger | -0.56 | -7.5% |
| 138th | Papua New Guinea | -0.57 | 1.5% |
| 139th | Tonga | -0.58 | -0.9% |
| 140th | Guyana | -0.61 | 3.0% |
| 141st | Madagascar | -0.61 | -11.2% |
| 142nd | Pakistan | -0.61 | -5.0% |
| 143rd | Yemen, Republic of | -0.62 | 4.0% |
| 144th | Lesotho | -0.63 | 3.0% |
| 145th | Viet Nam | -0.63 | 0.2% |
| 146th | Malawi | -0.64 | -30.3% |
| 147th | Suriname | -0.67 | -9.0% |
| 148th | Djibouti | -0.68 | -2.4% |
| 149th | Argentina | -0.74 | 10.6% |
| 150th | Nigeria | -0.74 | 2.2% |
| 151st | Cameroon | -0.75 | 2.2% |
| 152nd | Micronesia, Federated States of | -0.75 | -15.3% |
| 153rd | Sierra Leone | -0.76 | 5.6% |
| 154th | Nepal | -0.76 | -5.5% |
| 155th | Vanuatu | -0.78 | -15.0% |
| 156th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | -0.80 | 8.7% |
| 157th | Mauritania | -0.84 | -18.4% |
| 158th | São Tomé and Principe | -0.85 | -10.3% |
| 159th | Syrian Arab Republic | -0.86 | 6.9% |
| 160th | Bangladesh | -0.86 | 1.0% |
| 161st | Palau | -0.87 | -5.8% |
| 162nd | Togo | -0.89 | -1.1% |
| 163rd | Côte d'Ivoire | -0.93 | 4.8% |
| 164th | Tajikistan | -1.01 | 5.1% |
| 165th | Lao PDR | -1.02 | 5.3% |
| 166th | Haiti | -1.03 | -9.6% |
| 167th | Iraq | -1.03 | -2.3% |
| 168th | Liberia | -1.04 | 11.5% |
| 169th | Nauru | -1.05 | -3.9% |
| 170th | Guinea | -1.06 | 5.7% |
| 171st | Angola | -1.06 | -0.1% |
| 172nd | Chad | -1.08 | -0.6% |
| 173rd | Algeria | -1.10 | -14.6% |
| 174th | Timor-Leste | -1.11 | 4.2% |
| 175th | Burundi | -1.12 | 3.9% |
| 176th | Guinea-Bissau | -1.12 | 6.0% |
| 177th | Ecuador | -1.12 | 10.7% |
| 178th | Tuvalu | -1.15 | -14.0% |
| 179th | Bhutan | -1.16 | -8.1% |
| 180th | Central African Republic | -1.16 | 7.6% |
| 181st | Belarus | -1.19 | -2.7% |
| 182nd | Solomon Islands | -1.20 | 1.4% |
| 183rd | Marshall Islands | -1.24 | -1.2% |
| 184th | Congo, Republic of | -1.25 | 2.2% |
| 185th | Libya | -1.30 | -9.5% |
| 186th | Kiribati | -1.32 | -8.1% |
| 187th | Sudan | -1.34 | -5.5% |
| 188th | Comoros | -1.40 | 9.3% |
| 189th | Afghanistan | -1.52 | 8.9% |
| 190th | Uzbekistan | -1.54 | -4.6% |
| 191st | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -1.55 | -2.3% |
| 192nd | Equatorial Guinea | -1.55 | -5.3% |
| 193rd | Cuba | -1.67 | -4.3% |
| 194th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | -1.71 | -0.2% |
| 195th | Zimbabwe | -2.00 | 3.8% |
| 196th | Turkmenistan | -2.06 | -4.8% |
| 197th | Eritrea | -2.16 | 2.0% |
| 198th | Myanmar | -2.24 | -0.5% |
| 199th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | -2.30 | 7.6% |
| 200th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | -2.45 | -2.2% |
FAQ
What was Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality in 2010?▾
Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality in 2010 was 1.35. This ranked 26th globally.
How did Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality change in 2010?▾
Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality increased by 5.4% in 2010 compared to 2009.
Which country had the highest regulatory quality in 2010?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China had the highest regulatory quality in 2010 at 1.87.
What is the regulatory quality of Macao SAR, China in 2010?▾
The regulatory quality of Macao SAR, China in 2010 was 1.35. This ranked 26th globally.
How does 2010 compare to 2009 for Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality?▾
Macao SAR, China's regulatory quality went from 1.28 in 2009 to 1.35 in 2010, a 5.4% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Macao SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2010. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 9.2%. View full analysis →
Related
2009
2011
All years
Full ranking 2010
Political Stability
Government Effectiveness
Rule of Law
Control of Corruption
Voice and Accountability
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 2000
Regulatory Quality 1990s
Regulatory Quality 2000s
Regulatory Quality 2010s
Regulatory Quality 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Channel Islands
vs Faroe Islands
vs Denmark
vs Netherlands
Global Ranking