Namibia - Energy Use per Capita 2010
653
−123 from 2009
Namibia's energy use per capita was 653 in 2010, decreased +123 from 776 in 2009. This was the 42nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2010▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 135 | 3.8% |
| 2nd | Bangladesh | 196 | 4.2% |
| 3rd | Chad | 219 | -2.2% |
| 4th | Burkina Faso | 228 | 32.9% |
| 5th | Eritrea | 249 | 1.7% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 255 | 0.7% |
| 7th | Myanmar | 278 | -4.2% |
| 8th | Tajikistan | 284 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 290 | 0.5% |
| 10th | Yemen, Republic of | 292 | -6.2% |
| 11th | Ghana | 296 | 8.1% |
| 12th | Senegal | 313 | 2.8% |
| 13th | Mozambique | 318 | -11.4% |
| 14th | Cambodia | 323 | 3.8% |
| 15th | Nigeria | 335 | 28.5% |
| 16th | Rwanda | 349 | -0.3% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 356 | -2.0% |
| 18th | Benin | 364 | 0.6% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 370 | -13.3% |
| 20th | Nepal | 373 | 2.3% |
| 21st | Congo, Republic of | 376 | 4.5% |
| 22nd | Haiti | 389 | 3.1% |
| 23rd | Zimbabwe | 420 | 0.5% |
| 24th | Tanzania | 421 | 1.4% |
| 25th | Uganda | 421 | 1.5% |
| 26th | Lao PDR | 425 | 1.2% |
| 27th | Pakistan | 429 | -0.9% |
| 28th | Philippines | 431 | 2.6% |
| 29th | Sudan | 445 | -7.7% |
| 30th | Togo | 463 | -2.7% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 467 | 6.0% |
| 32nd | Kenya | 470 | -0.2% |
| 33rd | Angola | 487 | -3.5% |
| 34th | Kyrgyz Republic | 504 | -5.9% |
| 35th | Morocco | 526 | 4.2% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 529 | 1.1% |
| 37th | India | 532 | 4.4% |
| 38th | Honduras | 562 | -0.7% |
| 39th | Peru | 603 | 3.5% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 625 | 6.7% |
| 41st | Zambia | 629 | 1.5% |
| 42nd | Namibia | 653 | -15.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 669 | -0.9% |
| 44th | Viet Nam | 670 | 8.9% |
| 45th | El Salvador | 697 | 1.1% |
| 46th | Colombia | 701 | -2.0% |
| 47th | Guatemala | 714 | -1.0% |
| 48th | Albania | 731 | -0.4% |
| 49th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 752 | -3.3% |
| 50th | Dominican Republic | 773 | 4.0% |
| 51st | Armenia | 816 | -4.2% |
| 52nd | Georgia | 825 | 1.6% |
| 53rd | Eswatini | 836 | -16.0% |
| 54th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 838 | -2.8% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 846 | 5.2% |
| 56th | Ecuador | 867 | 4.5% |
| 57th | Jamaica | 875 | -7.2% |
| 58th | Panama | 948 | 8.8% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 956 | 11.1% |
| 60th | Syrian Arab Republic | 964 | -1.4% |
| 61st | Jordan | 973 | -6.8% |
| 62nd | Costa Rica | 999 | -0.3% |
| 63rd | Cuba | 1,000 | 8.4% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,051 | 5.1% |
| 65th | Iraq | 1,064 | 6.9% |
| 66th | Botswana | 1,131 | 7.2% |
| 67th | Algeria | 1,151 | 0.3% |
| 68th | Uruguay | 1,227 | -2.2% |
| 69th | Lebanon | 1,273 | -4.8% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,303 | 17.2% |
| 71st | Azerbaijan | 1,306 | -6.1% |
| 72nd | Suriname | 1,351 | 16.1% |
| 73rd | Equatorial Guinea | 1,352 | -1.7% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,384 | 9.7% |
| 75th | Kosovo | 1,395 | 2.8% |
| 76th | Mongolia | 1,412 | 4.2% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,445 | 6.0% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,475 | 2.6% |
| 79th | Mexico | 1,582 | -2.2% |
| 80th | Uzbekistan | 1,593 | 7.0% |
| 81st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,700 | 6.1% |
| 82nd | Thailand | 1,719 | 8.9% |
| 83rd | Romania | 1,725 | 1.0% |
| 84th | Chile | 1,796 | 3.4% |
| 85th | Montenegro | 1,820 | 17.1% |
| 86th | Argentina | 1,826 | 6.0% |
| 87th | China | 1,900 | 9.9% |
| 88th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,923 | -5.9% |
| 89th | Malta | 2,023 | 3.5% |
| 90th | Serbia | 2,145 | 3.5% |
| 91st | Latvia | 2,149 | 4.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,181 | -0.9% |
| 93rd | Cyprus | 2,192 | -5.2% |
| 94th | Portugal | 2,223 | -3.5% |
| 95th | Lithuania | 2,277 | -17.9% |
| 96th | Bulgaria | 2,394 | 2.4% |
| 97th | Greece | 2,488 | -6.3% |
| 98th | South Africa | 2,518 | -7.9% |
| 99th | Malaysia | 2,530 | 1.8% |
| 100th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,639 | -1.2% |
| 101st | Poland | 2,642 | 7.3% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,651 | 4.0% |
| 103rd | Spain | 2,735 | -0.5% |
| 104th | Ukraine | 2,849 | 16.1% |
| 105th | Belarus | 2,896 | 3.8% |
| 106th | Italy | 2,904 | 2.0% |
| 107th | Gabon | 2,957 | 8.4% |
| 108th | Israel | 3,044 | 5.9% |
| 109th | Libya | 3,132 | 12.5% |
| 110th | Ireland | 3,150 | -0.8% |
| 111th | United Kingdom | 3,235 | 2.9% |
| 112th | Switzerland | 3,323 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,441 | 10.7% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,456 | 3.9% |
| 115th | Denmark | 3,498 | 4.1% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,590 | 2.1% |
| 117th | Japan | 3,900 | 5.2% |
| 118th | Germany | 4,030 | 5.4% |
| 119th | France | 4,040 | 2.6% |
| 120th | Austria | 4,065 | 6.4% |
| 121st | Turkmenistan | 4,078 | 11.8% |
| 122nd | Kazakhstan | 4,106 | 7.5% |
| 123rd | New Zealand | 4,147 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,309 | 5.7% |
| 125th | Estonia | 4,419 | 31.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,853 | 7.2% |
| 127th | Singapore | 4,857 | -8.7% |
| 128th | Korea | 4,920 | 8.0% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,979 | 6.7% |
| 130th | Sweden | 5,443 | 11.3% |
| 131st | Belgium | 5,510 | 6.8% |
| 132nd | Gibraltar | 5,535 | -0.2% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,763 | -1.4% |
| 134th | Norway | 6,455 | 4.1% |
| 135th | Oman | 6,737 | 13.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,813 | 8.9% |
| 137th | United States | 7,163 | 1.5% |
| 138th | Canada | 7,661 | -0.5% |
| 139th | Saudi Arabia | 7,965 | 11.8% |
| 140th | Brunei Darussalam | 8,261 | 4.5% |
| 141st | Luxembourg | 8,336 | 4.7% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,944 | -5.7% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 10,318 | -1.1% |
| 144th | Kuwait | 11,312 | 7.4% |
| 145th | Curaçao | 13,360 | -13.0% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 15,019 | 5.8% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,780 | 11.4% |
| 148th | Iceland | 17,025 | -5.1% |
FAQ
What was Namibia's energy use per capita in 2010?▾
Namibia's energy use per capita in 2010 was 653. This ranked 42nd globally.
How did Namibia's energy use per capita change in 2010?▾
Namibia's energy use per capita decreased by 15.8% in 2010 compared to 2009.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2010?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2010 at 17,025.
What is the energy use per capita of Namibia in 2010?▾
The energy use per capita of Namibia in 2010 was 653. This ranked 42nd globally.
How does 2010 compare to 2009 for Namibia's energy use per capita?▾
Namibia's energy use per capita went from 776 in 2009 to 653 in 2010, a 15.8% decrease.
Related
2009
2011
All years
Full ranking 2010
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2009
Lowest: 1990
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Morocco
vs Tunisia
vs Viet Nam
vs Jordan
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking