Pakistan - Energy Use per Capita 2010
429
−4 from 2009
Pakistan's energy use per capita was 429 in 2010, decreased +4 from 433 in 2009. This was the 27th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2010▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 135 | 3.8% |
| 2nd | Bangladesh | 196 | 4.2% |
| 3rd | Chad | 219 | -2.2% |
| 4th | Burkina Faso | 228 | 32.9% |
| 5th | Eritrea | 249 | 1.7% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 255 | 0.7% |
| 7th | Myanmar | 278 | -4.2% |
| 8th | Tajikistan | 284 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 290 | 0.5% |
| 10th | Yemen, Republic of | 292 | -6.2% |
| 11th | Ghana | 296 | 8.1% |
| 12th | Senegal | 313 | 2.8% |
| 13th | Mozambique | 318 | -11.4% |
| 14th | Cambodia | 323 | 3.8% |
| 15th | Nigeria | 335 | 28.5% |
| 16th | Rwanda | 349 | -0.3% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 356 | -2.0% |
| 18th | Benin | 364 | 0.6% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 370 | -13.3% |
| 20th | Nepal | 373 | 2.3% |
| 21st | Congo, Republic of | 376 | 4.5% |
| 22nd | Haiti | 389 | 3.1% |
| 23rd | Zimbabwe | 420 | 0.5% |
| 24th | Tanzania | 421 | 1.4% |
| 25th | Uganda | 421 | 1.5% |
| 26th | Lao PDR | 425 | 1.2% |
| 27th | Pakistan | 429 | -0.9% |
| 28th | Philippines | 431 | 2.6% |
| 29th | Sudan | 445 | -7.7% |
| 30th | Togo | 463 | -2.7% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 467 | 6.0% |
| 32nd | Kenya | 470 | -0.2% |
| 33rd | Angola | 487 | -3.5% |
| 34th | Kyrgyz Republic | 504 | -5.9% |
| 35th | Morocco | 526 | 4.2% |
| 36th | Nicaragua | 529 | 1.1% |
| 37th | India | 532 | 4.4% |
| 38th | Honduras | 562 | -0.7% |
| 39th | Peru | 603 | 3.5% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 625 | 6.7% |
| 41st | Zambia | 629 | 1.5% |
| 42nd | Namibia | 653 | -15.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 669 | -0.9% |
| 44th | Viet Nam | 670 | 8.9% |
| 45th | El Salvador | 697 | 1.1% |
| 46th | Colombia | 701 | -2.0% |
| 47th | Guatemala | 714 | -1.0% |
| 48th | Albania | 731 | -0.4% |
| 49th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 752 | -3.3% |
| 50th | Dominican Republic | 773 | 4.0% |
| 51st | Armenia | 816 | -4.2% |
| 52nd | Georgia | 825 | 1.6% |
| 53rd | Eswatini | 836 | -16.0% |
| 54th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 838 | -2.8% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 846 | 5.2% |
| 56th | Ecuador | 867 | 4.5% |
| 57th | Jamaica | 875 | -7.2% |
| 58th | Panama | 948 | 8.8% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 956 | 11.1% |
| 60th | Syrian Arab Republic | 964 | -1.4% |
| 61st | Jordan | 973 | -6.8% |
| 62nd | Costa Rica | 999 | -0.3% |
| 63rd | Cuba | 1,000 | 8.4% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,051 | 5.1% |
| 65th | Iraq | 1,064 | 6.9% |
| 66th | Botswana | 1,131 | 7.2% |
| 67th | Algeria | 1,151 | 0.3% |
| 68th | Uruguay | 1,227 | -2.2% |
| 69th | Lebanon | 1,273 | -4.8% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,303 | 17.2% |
| 71st | Azerbaijan | 1,306 | -6.1% |
| 72nd | Suriname | 1,351 | 16.1% |
| 73rd | Equatorial Guinea | 1,352 | -1.7% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,384 | 9.7% |
| 75th | Kosovo | 1,395 | 2.8% |
| 76th | Mongolia | 1,412 | 4.2% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,445 | 6.0% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,475 | 2.6% |
| 79th | Mexico | 1,582 | -2.2% |
| 80th | Uzbekistan | 1,593 | 7.0% |
| 81st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,700 | 6.1% |
| 82nd | Thailand | 1,719 | 8.9% |
| 83rd | Romania | 1,725 | 1.0% |
| 84th | Chile | 1,796 | 3.4% |
| 85th | Montenegro | 1,820 | 17.1% |
| 86th | Argentina | 1,826 | 6.0% |
| 87th | China | 1,900 | 9.9% |
| 88th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,923 | -5.9% |
| 89th | Malta | 2,023 | 3.5% |
| 90th | Serbia | 2,145 | 3.5% |
| 91st | Latvia | 2,149 | 4.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,181 | -0.9% |
| 93rd | Cyprus | 2,192 | -5.2% |
| 94th | Portugal | 2,223 | -3.5% |
| 95th | Lithuania | 2,277 | -17.9% |
| 96th | Bulgaria | 2,394 | 2.4% |
| 97th | Greece | 2,488 | -6.3% |
| 98th | South Africa | 2,518 | -7.9% |
| 99th | Malaysia | 2,530 | 1.8% |
| 100th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,639 | -1.2% |
| 101st | Poland | 2,642 | 7.3% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,651 | 4.0% |
| 103rd | Spain | 2,735 | -0.5% |
| 104th | Ukraine | 2,849 | 16.1% |
| 105th | Belarus | 2,896 | 3.8% |
| 106th | Italy | 2,904 | 2.0% |
| 107th | Gabon | 2,957 | 8.4% |
| 108th | Israel | 3,044 | 5.9% |
| 109th | Libya | 3,132 | 12.5% |
| 110th | Ireland | 3,150 | -0.8% |
| 111th | United Kingdom | 3,235 | 2.9% |
| 112th | Switzerland | 3,323 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,441 | 10.7% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,456 | 3.9% |
| 115th | Denmark | 3,498 | 4.1% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,590 | 2.1% |
| 117th | Japan | 3,900 | 5.2% |
| 118th | Germany | 4,030 | 5.4% |
| 119th | France | 4,040 | 2.6% |
| 120th | Austria | 4,065 | 6.4% |
| 121st | Turkmenistan | 4,078 | 11.8% |
| 122nd | Kazakhstan | 4,106 | 7.5% |
| 123rd | New Zealand | 4,147 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,309 | 5.7% |
| 125th | Estonia | 4,419 | 31.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,853 | 7.2% |
| 127th | Singapore | 4,857 | -8.7% |
| 128th | Korea | 4,920 | 8.0% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,979 | 6.7% |
| 130th | Sweden | 5,443 | 11.3% |
| 131st | Belgium | 5,510 | 6.8% |
| 132nd | Gibraltar | 5,535 | -0.2% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,763 | -1.4% |
| 134th | Norway | 6,455 | 4.1% |
| 135th | Oman | 6,737 | 13.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,813 | 8.9% |
| 137th | United States | 7,163 | 1.5% |
| 138th | Canada | 7,661 | -0.5% |
| 139th | Saudi Arabia | 7,965 | 11.8% |
| 140th | Brunei Darussalam | 8,261 | 4.5% |
| 141st | Luxembourg | 8,336 | 4.7% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,944 | -5.7% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 10,318 | -1.1% |
| 144th | Kuwait | 11,312 | 7.4% |
| 145th | Curaçao | 13,360 | -13.0% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 15,019 | 5.8% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,780 | 11.4% |
| 148th | Iceland | 17,025 | -5.1% |
FAQ
What was Pakistan's energy use per capita in 2010?▾
Pakistan's energy use per capita in 2010 was 429. This ranked 27th globally.
How did Pakistan's energy use per capita change in 2010?▾
Pakistan's energy use per capita decreased by 0.9% in 2010 compared to 2009.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2010?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2010 at 17,025.
What is the energy use per capita of Pakistan in 2010?▾
The energy use per capita of Pakistan in 2010 was 429. This ranked 27th globally.
How does 2010 compare to 2009 for Pakistan's energy use per capita?▾
Pakistan's energy use per capita went from 433 in 2009 to 429 in 2010, a 0.9% decrease.
Related
2009
2011
All years
Full ranking 2010
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 1991
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Guinea
vs Tajikistan
vs Comoros
vs Benin
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Energy Use per Capita
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking