Peru - Maternal Mortality Ratio 1991
Peru's maternal mortality ratio was 201.00 in 1991, increased +10.00 from 191.00 in 1990. This was the 122nd highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Spain | 6.00 | 0.0% |
| 2nd | Greece | 6.00 | -14.3% |
| 3rd | United Kingdom | 7.00 | 16.7% |
| 4th | Canada | 8.00 | 14.3% |
| 5th | Finland | 8.00 | 0.0% |
| 6th | Kuwait | 8.00 | -50.0% |
| 7th | Norway | 8.00 | -11.1% |
| 8th | Sweden | 8.00 | 0.0% |
| 9th | Australia | 9.00 | 0.0% |
| 10th | Belgium | 9.00 | 0.0% |
| 11th | Croatia | 10.00 | 0.0% |
| 12th | Ireland | 10.00 | -9.1% |
| 13th | Austria | 11.00 | -8.3% |
| 14th | Germany | 11.00 | -8.3% |
| 15th | Iceland | 11.00 | -15.4% |
| 16th | Montenegro | 11.00 | 10.0% |
| 17th | San Marino | 11.00 | 0.0% |
| 18th | Denmark | 12.00 | 0.0% |
| 19th | Netherlands | 12.00 | 0.0% |
| 20th | United States | 12.00 | 0.0% |
| 21st | Japan | 13.00 | -7.1% |
| 22nd | Qatar | 13.00 | 0.0% |
| 23rd | Slovenia | 13.00 | -7.1% |
| 24th | Switzerland | 14.00 | 0.0% |
| 25th | Serbia | 14.00 | 0.0% |
| 26th | Cyprus | 15.00 | 0.0% |
| 27th | Czechia | 15.00 | 0.0% |
| 28th | Monaco | 15.00 | -6.3% |
| 29th | North Macedonia | 15.00 | -6.3% |
| 30th | New Zealand | 16.00 | -11.1% |
| 31st | Singapore | 16.00 | -5.9% |
| 32nd | Malta | 17.00 | 0.0% |
| 33rd | Portugal | 17.00 | 0.0% |
| 34th | Slovak Republic | 17.00 | -5.6% |
| 35th | Andorra | 18.00 | 12.5% |
| 36th | France | 18.00 | 0.0% |
| 37th | Italy | 18.00 | 0.0% |
| 38th | Poland | 18.00 | 0.0% |
| 39th | United Arab Emirates | 19.00 | 0.0% |
| 40th | European Union | 20.00 | -4.8% |
| 41st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 23.00 | -8.0% |
| 42nd | Hungary | 24.00 | -4.0% |
| 43rd | Bulgaria | 25.00 | -7.4% |
| 44th | Luxembourg | 25.00 | 4.2% |
| 45th | Puerto Rico (US) | 26.00 | -18.8% |
| 46th | Albania | 28.00 | -6.7% |
| 47th | Israel | 28.00 | -3.4% |
| 48th | Korea | 28.00 | 0.0% |
| 49th | Oman | 28.00 | -3.4% |
| 50th | Lithuania | 29.00 | 0.0% |
| 51st | Saudi Arabia | 29.00 | -3.3% |
| 52nd | Belarus | 32.00 | -3.0% |
| 53rd | Uruguay | 33.00 | -5.7% |
| 54th | Bahrain | 34.00 | -2.9% |
| 55th | Syrian Arab Republic | 35.00 | -5.4% |
| 56th | Georgia | 36.00 | 5.9% |
| 57th | Lebanon | 38.00 | -20.8% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 38.00 | -11.6% |
| 59th | Costa Rica | 39.00 | -2.5% |
| 60th | Ukraine | 40.00 | 0.0% |
| 61st | Türkiye | 41.00 | -2.4% |
| 62nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 42.00 | 2.4% |
| 63rd | Estonia | 42.00 | -4.5% |
| 64th | Azerbaijan | 43.00 | 4.9% |
| 65th | Latvia | 46.00 | -2.1% |
| 66th | Armenia | 47.00 | 0.0% |
| 67th | Uzbekistan | 47.00 | -6.0% |
| 68th | Malaysia | 49.00 | -3.9% |
| 69th | Moldova | 53.00 | 0.0% |
| 70th | Chile | 54.00 | -3.6% |
| 71st | Seychelles | 54.00 | 1.9% |
| 72nd | Sri Lanka | 57.00 | -3.4% |
| 73rd | Russian Federation | 57.00 | -1.7% |
| 74th | Jamaica | 58.00 | 7.4% |
| 75th | Grenada | 59.00 | -3.3% |
| 76th | Thailand | 59.00 | -1.7% |
| 77th | Barbados | 60.00 | 1.7% |
| 78th | Turkmenistan | 60.00 | -3.2% |
| 79th | Kazakhstan | 64.00 | 0.0% |
| 80th | Libya | 64.00 | -4.5% |
| 81st | Brunei Darussalam | 65.00 | -4.4% |
| 82nd | Cuba | 66.00 | 0.0% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 67.00 | -1.5% |
| 84th | Bahamas, The | 67.00 | 3.1% |
| 85th | Fiji | 67.00 | -4.3% |
| 86th | Kyrgyz Republic | 71.00 | -1.4% |
| 87th | St. Lucia | 71.00 | -1.4% |
| 88th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 71.00 | -1.4% |
| 89th | Jordan | 74.00 | 2.8% |
| 90th | Belize | 75.00 | -2.6% |
| 91st | Mauritius | 75.00 | -2.6% |
| 92nd | West Bank and Gaza | 75.00 | -3.8% |
| 93rd | Mexico | 77.00 | -4.9% |
| 94th | Tajikistan | 79.00 | -1.3% |
| 95th | Dominica | 81.00 | 5.2% |
| 96th | Trinidad and Tobago | 82.00 | -2.4% |
| 97th | Tunisia | 83.00 | -2.4% |
| 98th | Panama | 87.00 | -2.2% |
| 99th | China | 92.00 | -9.8% |
| 100th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 94.00 | -12.1% |
| 101st | Colombia | 99.00 | -2.9% |
| 102nd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 100.00 | -6.5% |
| 103rd | Romania | 104.00 | -11.9% |
| 104th | Palau | 106.00 | 6.0% |
| 105th | Brazil | 128.00 | -8.6% |
| 106th | El Salvador | 129.00 | -11.0% |
| 107th | Samoa | 131.00 | -3.0% |
| 108th | Tonga | 134.00 | -2.9% |
| 109th | Vanuatu | 140.00 | -7.3% |
| 110th | Viet Nam | 142.00 | -3.4% |
| 111th | Honduras | 148.00 | -6.9% |
| 112th | Iraq | 157.00 | -19.5% |
| 113th | South Africa | 162.00 | -4.7% |
| 114th | São Tomé and Principe | 166.00 | 1.2% |
| 115th | Philippines | 172.00 | -0.6% |
| 116th | Ecuador | 177.00 | 5.4% |
| 117th | Solomon Islands | 178.00 | -3.3% |
| 118th | Kiribati | 188.00 | -5.5% |
| 119th | Paraguay | 192.00 | -3.0% |
| 120th | Dominican Republic | 193.00 | -4.9% |
| 121st | Algeria | 198.00 | -2.0% |
| 122nd | Peru | 201.00 | 5.2% |
| 123rd | Micronesia, Federated States of | 208.00 | -0.5% |
| 124th | Nauru | 216.00 | 10.8% |
| 125th | Guyana | 219.00 | -2.2% |
| 126th | Mongolia | 227.00 | -17.8% |
| 127th | Guatemala | 268.00 | -0.7% |
| 128th | Nicaragua | 273.00 | -2.8% |
| 129th | Cabo Verde | 277.00 | -7.0% |
| 130th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 280.00 | -7.3% |
| 131st | Botswana | 283.00 | -4.4% |
| 132nd | Tuvalu | 289.00 | -0.7% |
| 133rd | Marshall Islands | 297.00 | -4.5% |
| 134th | Maldives | 310.00 | -10.4% |
| 135th | Zimbabwe | 332.00 | -5.9% |
| 136th | Namibia | 337.00 | 3.7% |
| 137th | Yemen, Republic of | 341.00 | -5.0% |
| 138th | Suriname | 347.00 | -0.9% |
| 139th | Papua New Guinea | 354.00 | -1.7% |
| 140th | Gabon | 369.00 | 0.3% |
| 141st | Indonesia | 378.00 | -3.6% |
| 142nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 391.00 | -3.9% |
| 143rd | Pakistan | 443.00 | 2.1% |
| 144th | Morocco | 490.00 | -6.1% |
| 145th | Kenya | 493.00 | -15.9% |
| 146th | India | 498.00 | -3.5% |
| 147th | Congo, Republic of | 514.00 | 1.8% |
| 148th | Eswatini | 545.00 | 4.8% |
| 149th | Uganda | 549.00 | -4.5% |
| 150th | Myanmar | 566.00 | -3.4% |
| 151st | Côte d'Ivoire | 584.00 | -5.7% |
| 152nd | Cameroon | 584.00 | 2.5% |
| 153rd | Zambia | 611.00 | -2.2% |
| 154th | Senegal | 616.00 | -3.8% |
| 155th | Lesotho | 641.00 | -3.6% |
| 156th | Benin | 666.00 | -3.8% |
| 157th | Bhutan | 671.00 | -4.7% |
| 158th | Togo | 676.00 | 2.9% |
| 159th | Cambodia | 681.00 | 0.0% |
| 160th | Equatorial Guinea | 688.00 | -0.1% |
| 161st | Madagascar | 691.00 | -0.1% |
| 162nd | Comoros | 704.00 | -4.5% |
| 163rd | Djibouti | 731.00 | 0.8% |
| 164th | Burkina Faso | 732.00 | -3.6% |
| 165th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 735.00 | -2.6% |
| 166th | Ghana | 745.00 | -3.1% |
| 167th | Lao PDR | 798.00 | -4.3% |
| 168th | Angola | 826.00 | -5.7% |
| 169th | Haiti | 831.00 | -4.9% |
| 170th | Mauritania | 845.00 | -1.5% |
| 171st | Nepal | 850.00 | -7.6% |
| 172nd | Sudan | 873.00 | 3.9% |
| 173rd | Tanzania | 873.00 | -3.0% |
| 174th | Bangladesh | 890.00 | 2.3% |
| 175th | Central African Republic | 910.00 | 5.1% |
| 176th | Niger | 957.00 | -2.6% |
| 177th | Mali | 1,063.00 | -2.2% |
| 178th | Malawi | 1,080.00 | -2.9% |
| 179th | Chad | 1,093.00 | -1.8% |
| 180th | Mozambique | 1,094.00 | -4.9% |
| 181st | Guinea | 1,143.00 | -1.6% |
| 182nd | Gambia, The | 1,167.00 | -3.3% |
| 183rd | Nigeria | 1,282.00 | -0.2% |
| 184th | Eritrea | 1,384.00 | 2.4% |
| 185th | Rwanda | 1,386.00 | 5.9% |
| 186th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | 1,431.00 | 5.4% |
| 187th | Timor-Leste | 1,439.00 | -2.6% |
| 188th | Burundi | 1,513.00 | -0.1% |
| 189th | Afghanistan | 1,534.00 | -1.0% |
| 190th | Liberia | 1,627.00 | -24.2% |
| 191st | Guinea-Bissau | 1,663.00 | -2.7% |
| 192nd | Sierra Leone | 1,699.00 | 8.1% |
| 193rd | South Sudan | 4,764.00 | -2.3% |
FAQ
Peru's maternal mortality ratio in 1991 was 201.00. This ranked 122nd globally.
Peru's maternal mortality ratio increased by 5.2% in 1991 compared to 1990.
South Sudan had the highest maternal mortality ratio in 1991 at 4,764.00.
The maternal mortality ratio of Peru in 1991 was 201.00. This ranked 122nd globally.
Peru's maternal mortality ratio went from 191.00 in 1990 to 201.00 in 1991, a 5.2% increase.
Peru matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 1991. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 48.6%. View full analysis →