Sierra Leone - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1992
Sierra Leone's real effective exchange rate was 106.25 in 1992, decreased +11.04 from 117.30 in 1991. This was the 46th highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Romania | 41.97 | -37.7% |
| 2nd | Slovak Republic | 44.98 | 1.3% |
| 3rd | Czechia | 45.09 | 4.6% |
| 4th | Zambia | 46.99 | -4.5% |
| 5th | Nigeria | 49.77 | -17.2% |
| 6th | Poland | 61.68 | 6.1% |
| 7th | Hungary | 64.03 | 8.9% |
| 8th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 72.38 | -45.0% |
| 9th | Equatorial Guinea | 75.61 | -4.2% |
| 10th | Uruguay | 76.84 | 7.3% |
| 11th | Australia | 76.95 | -18.1% |
| 12th | Colombia | 77.16 | 11.1% |
| 13th | New Zealand | 79.79 | -5.4% |
| 14th | Samoa | 79.97 | 3.2% |
| 15th | Trinidad and Tobago | 82.82 | 2.1% |
| 16th | Brazil | 84.45 | -12.3% |
| 17th | China | 84.58 | -4.3% |
| 18th | Costa Rica | 85.74 | 5.8% |
| 19th | Greece | 85.98 | -2.9% |
| 20th | Dominican Republic | 86.03 | 0.8% |
| 21st | Malta | 91.45 | -3.8% |
| 22nd | Cyprus | 91.55 | 3.2% |
| 23rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 91.78 | 19.7% |
| 24th | Solomon Islands | 91.94 | -1.1% |
| 25th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 92.43 | -1.4% |
| 26th | Chile | 93.28 | 5.7% |
| 27th | Switzerland | 93.63 | 11.0% |
| 28th | Denmark | 95.58 | 3.4% |
| 29th | Paraguay | 97.13 | -3.0% |
| 30th | Portugal | 97.16 | 8.7% |
| 31st | Norway | 97.34 | -17.4% |
| 32nd | Singapore | 97.71 | 15.3% |
| 33rd | Canada | 97.84 | -22.1% |
| 34th | Netherlands | 98.75 | 8.9% |
| 35th | Morocco | 99.87 | 0.5% |
| 36th | Philippines | 100.37 | 10.5% |
| 37th | Luxembourg | 101.01 | 0.3% |
| 38th | St. Lucia | 101.27 | 0.6% |
| 39th | United States | 101.79 | 30.6% |
| 40th | Belgium | 102.54 | 8.5% |
| 41st | Belize | 103.23 | -3.1% |
| 42nd | Ireland | 103.32 | 1.0% |
| 43rd | Austria | 103.45 | 12.2% |
| 44th | Grenada | 104.44 | -1.0% |
| 45th | Israel | 104.64 | -2.5% |
| 46th | Sierra Leone | 106.25 | -9.4% |
| 47th | Japan | 107.04 | -13.3% |
| 48th | France | 107.33 | 1.0% |
| 49th | Spain | 107.34 | 0.3% |
| 50th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 108.68 | -1.7% |
| 51st | Mexico | 108.96 | -12.8% |
| 52nd | Germany | 110.91 | 10.8% |
| 53rd | Papua New Guinea | 111.54 | -0.2% |
| 54th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 111.93 | -4.7% |
| 55th | Bahamas, The | 115.64 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Italy | 116.48 | -0.6% |
| 57th | Finland | 117.54 | -6.3% |
| 58th | Togo | 119.90 | 1.2% |
| 59th | Saudi Arabia | 120.01 | -5.8% |
| 60th | Uganda | 120.16 | -33.2% |
| 61st | United Kingdom | 120.22 | -1.3% |
| 62nd | Burundi | 121.62 | -12.7% |
| 63rd | Pakistan | 121.64 | -1.8% |
| 64th | Fiji | 121.90 | 0.2% |
| 65th | Malaysia | 123.42 | 6.7% |
| 66th | Bahrain | 124.34 | -5.1% |
| 67th | Côte d'Ivoire | 126.49 | 4.2% |
| 68th | Ghana | 127.03 | -11.8% |
| 69th | Dominica | 128.68 | 0.8% |
| 70th | Nicaragua | 130.64 | 17.7% |
| 71st | Antigua and Barbuda | 131.06 | -1.5% |
| 72nd | Korea | 131.49 | 21.6% |
| 73rd | Tunisia | 133.12 | 2.0% |
| 74th | South Africa | 134.31 | 3.2% |
| 75th | Algeria | 135.15 | 2.6% |
| 76th | Central African Republic | 141.48 | -2.0% |
| 77th | Guyana | 143.35 | 9.7% |
| 78th | Iceland | 144.37 | 0.3% |
| 79th | Sweden | 146.71 | -8.3% |
| 80th | Cameroon | 150.00 | 0.6% |
| 81st | Gabon | 151.25 | -9.7% |
| 82nd | Malawi | 181.62 | -8.3% |
| 83rd | Gambia, The | 198.92 | 0.9% |
| 84th | Lesotho | 207.13 | 7.3% |
| 85th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 251.05 | - |
FAQ
Sierra Leone's real effective exchange rate in 1992 was 106.25. This ranked 46th globally.
Sierra Leone's real effective exchange rate decreased by 9.4% in 1992 compared to 1991.
Congo, Democratic Republic of had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1992 at 251.05.
The real effective exchange rate of Sierra Leone in 1992 was 106.25. This ranked 46th globally.
Sierra Leone's real effective exchange rate went from 117.30 in 1991 to 106.25 in 1992, a 9.4% decrease.
Sierra Leone matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 1992. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 24.2%. View full analysis →