Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1992
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 91.78 in 1992, increased +15.13 from 93.39 in 1991. This was the 23rd highest globally.
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Romania | 41.97 | -37.7% |
| 2nd | Slovak Republic | 44.98 | 1.3% |
| 3rd | Czechia | 45.09 | 4.6% |
| 4th | Zambia | 46.99 | -4.5% |
| 5th | Nigeria | 49.77 | -17.2% |
| 6th | Poland | 61.68 | 6.1% |
| 7th | Hungary | 64.03 | 8.9% |
| 8th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 72.38 | -45.0% |
| 9th | Equatorial Guinea | 75.61 | -4.2% |
| 10th | Uruguay | 76.84 | 7.3% |
| 11th | Australia | 76.95 | -18.1% |
| 12th | Colombia | 77.16 | 11.1% |
| 13th | New Zealand | 79.79 | -5.4% |
| 14th | Samoa | 79.97 | 3.2% |
| 15th | Trinidad and Tobago | 82.82 | 2.1% |
| 16th | Brazil | 84.45 | -12.3% |
| 17th | China | 84.58 | -4.3% |
| 18th | Costa Rica | 85.74 | 5.8% |
| 19th | Greece | 85.98 | -2.9% |
| 20th | Dominican Republic | 86.03 | 0.8% |
| 21st | Malta | 91.45 | -3.8% |
| 22nd | Cyprus | 91.55 | 3.2% |
| 23rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 91.78 | 19.7% |
| 24th | Solomon Islands | 91.94 | -1.1% |
| 25th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 92.43 | -1.4% |
| 26th | Chile | 93.28 | 5.7% |
| 27th | Switzerland | 93.63 | 11.0% |
| 28th | Denmark | 95.58 | 3.4% |
| 29th | Paraguay | 97.13 | -3.0% |
| 30th | Portugal | 97.16 | 8.7% |
| 31st | Norway | 97.34 | -17.4% |
| 32nd | Singapore | 97.71 | 15.3% |
| 33rd | Canada | 97.84 | -22.1% |
| 34th | Netherlands | 98.75 | 8.9% |
| 35th | Morocco | 99.87 | 0.5% |
| 36th | Philippines | 100.37 | 10.5% |
| 37th | Luxembourg | 101.01 | 0.3% |
| 38th | St. Lucia | 101.27 | 0.6% |
| 39th | United States | 101.79 | 30.6% |
| 40th | Belgium | 102.54 | 8.5% |
| 41st | Belize | 103.23 | -3.1% |
| 42nd | Ireland | 103.32 | 1.0% |
| 43rd | Austria | 103.45 | 12.2% |
| 44th | Grenada | 104.44 | -1.0% |
| 45th | Israel | 104.64 | -2.5% |
| 46th | Sierra Leone | 106.25 | -9.4% |
| 47th | Japan | 107.04 | -13.3% |
| 48th | France | 107.33 | 1.0% |
| 49th | Spain | 107.34 | 0.3% |
| 50th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 108.68 | -1.7% |
| 51st | Mexico | 108.96 | -12.8% |
| 52nd | Germany | 110.91 | 10.8% |
| 53rd | Papua New Guinea | 111.54 | -0.2% |
| 54th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 111.93 | -4.7% |
| 55th | Bahamas, The | 115.64 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Italy | 116.48 | -0.6% |
| 57th | Finland | 117.54 | -6.3% |
| 58th | Togo | 119.90 | 1.2% |
| 59th | Saudi Arabia | 120.01 | -5.8% |
| 60th | Uganda | 120.16 | -33.2% |
| 61st | United Kingdom | 120.22 | -1.3% |
| 62nd | Burundi | 121.62 | -12.7% |
| 63rd | Pakistan | 121.64 | -1.8% |
| 64th | Fiji | 121.90 | 0.2% |
| 65th | Malaysia | 123.42 | 6.7% |
| 66th | Bahrain | 124.34 | -5.1% |
| 67th | Côte d'Ivoire | 126.49 | 4.2% |
| 68th | Ghana | 127.03 | -11.8% |
| 69th | Dominica | 128.68 | 0.8% |
| 70th | Nicaragua | 130.64 | 17.7% |
| 71st | Antigua and Barbuda | 131.06 | -1.5% |
| 72nd | Korea | 131.49 | 21.6% |
| 73rd | Tunisia | 133.12 | 2.0% |
| 74th | South Africa | 134.31 | 3.2% |
| 75th | Algeria | 135.15 | 2.6% |
| 76th | Central African Republic | 141.48 | -2.0% |
| 77th | Guyana | 143.35 | 9.7% |
| 78th | Iceland | 144.37 | 0.3% |
| 79th | Sweden | 146.71 | -8.3% |
| 80th | Cameroon | 150.00 | 0.6% |
| 81st | Gabon | 151.25 | -9.7% |
| 82nd | Malawi | 181.62 | -8.3% |
| 83rd | Gambia, The | 198.92 | 0.9% |
| 84th | Lesotho | 207.13 | 7.3% |
| 85th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 251.05 | - |
FAQ
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1992 was 91.78. This ranked 23rd globally.
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 19.7% in 1992 compared to 1991.
Congo, Democratic Republic of had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1992 at 251.05.
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1992 was 91.78. This ranked 23rd globally.
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 93.39 in 1991 to 91.78 in 1992, a 19.7% increase.
Hong Kong SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 1992. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 6.0%. View full analysis →