South Sudan - Energy Use per Capita 2016
71
−6 from 2015
South Sudan's energy use per capita was 71 in 2016, decreased +6 from 76 in 2015. This was the 1st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2016▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | South Sudan | 71 | -7.3% |
| 2nd | Yemen, Republic of | 83 | -30.5% |
| 3rd | Niger | 147 | -0.9% |
| 4th | Chad | 213 | -1.9% |
| 5th | Bangladesh | 256 | 7.7% |
| 6th | Burkina Faso | 272 | -2.7% |
| 7th | Eritrea | 277 | 2.1% |
| 8th | Senegal | 287 | -3.3% |
| 9th | Madagascar | 293 | 6.5% |
| 10th | Tajikistan | 327 | 2.5% |
| 11th | Ghana | 328 | -0.4% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 331 | 3.5% |
| 13th | Rwanda | 348 | -0.7% |
| 14th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 355 | -1.0% |
| 15th | Myanmar | 376 | 6.4% |
| 16th | Mozambique | 381 | -1.1% |
| 17th | Côte d'Ivoire | 392 | 2.0% |
| 18th | Cameroon | 400 | -0.7% |
| 19th | Haiti | 409 | 2.1% |
| 20th | Benin | 409 | 7.8% |
| 21st | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 409 | 9.8% |
| 22nd | Cambodia | 413 | 8.7% |
| 23rd | Tanzania | 416 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Togo | 423 | 5.5% |
| 25th | Zimbabwe | 423 | -6.7% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 447 | 2.2% |
| 27th | Sudan | 448 | -3.2% |
| 28th | Nepal | 458 | 7.5% |
| 29th | Angola | 463 | -10.5% |
| 30th | Uganda | 474 | 0.6% |
| 31st | Philippines | 521 | 4.4% |
| 32nd | Syrian Arab Republic | 530 | -5.4% |
| 33rd | Kenya | 533 | 0.6% |
| 34th | Sri Lanka | 543 | 8.2% |
| 35th | Morocco | 558 | -1.0% |
| 36th | Congo, Republic of | 561 | 1.6% |
| 37th | Honduras | 616 | -6.5% |
| 38th | Kyrgyz Republic | 624 | -5.3% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 627 | 2.4% |
| 40th | India | 627 | 0.8% |
| 41st | Zambia | 684 | -0.4% |
| 42nd | El Salvador | 687 | 1.9% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 719 | 2.9% |
| 44th | Viet Nam | 739 | 8.7% |
| 45th | Lao PDR | 754 | 25.2% |
| 46th | Namibia | 759 | 5.9% |
| 47th | Peru | 764 | 2.8% |
| 48th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 779 | 4.0% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 834 | 5.9% |
| 50th | Albania | 841 | 4.6% |
| 51st | Dominican Republic | 843 | 5.6% |
| 52nd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 873 | 7.6% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 886 | -5.5% |
| 54th | Jordan | 888 | -1.8% |
| 55th | Colombia | 911 | 2.7% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 955 | 0.2% |
| 57th | Cuba | 960 | -1.8% |
| 58th | Jamaica | 999 | 10.6% |
| 59th | Costa Rica | 1,001 | -2.3% |
| 60th | Eswatini | 1,035 | -1.0% |
| 61st | Armenia | 1,043 | -3.8% |
| 62nd | Panama | 1,046 | 2.0% |
| 63rd | Paraguay | 1,073 | 15.9% |
| 64th | Iraq | 1,077 | 7.8% |
| 65th | Mauritius | 1,136 | 0.0% |
| 66th | Uzbekistan | 1,210 | 3.8% |
| 67th | Botswana | 1,245 | -4.8% |
| 68th | Georgia | 1,300 | 3.3% |
| 69th | Malta | 1,312 | -9.5% |
| 70th | Lebanon | 1,356 | 5.6% |
| 71st | Moldova | 1,356 | 3.7% |
| 72nd | Algeria | 1,371 | -3.1% |
| 73rd | North Macedonia | 1,408 | 1.5% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,415 | -4.5% |
| 75th | Azerbaijan | 1,481 | -2.0% |
| 76th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,510 | 13.6% |
| 77th | Mexico | 1,525 | -0.9% |
| 78th | Uruguay | 1,551 | 4.0% |
| 79th | Montenegro | 1,552 | -3.0% |
| 80th | Mongolia | 1,588 | 4.7% |
| 81st | Romania | 1,605 | 0.4% |
| 82nd | Türkiye | 1,725 | 4.7% |
| 83rd | Suriname | 1,729 | 9.6% |
| 84th | Cyprus | 1,762 | 5.0% |
| 85th | Argentina | 1,890 | -1.6% |
| 86th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,945 | 10.8% |
| 87th | Thailand | 1,985 | 2.7% |
| 88th | Ukraine | 2,008 | -1.0% |
| 89th | Croatia | 2,057 | 1.9% |
| 90th | Chile | 2,070 | 5.2% |
| 91st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,082 | 2.5% |
| 92nd | Greece | 2,109 | -1.8% |
| 93rd | Portugal | 2,111 | -0.5% |
| 94th | China | 2,149 | -1.2% |
| 95th | Serbia | 2,166 | 4.1% |
| 96th | Latvia | 2,172 | 0.8% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,312 | 2.4% |
| 98th | Gabon | 2,489 | -2.4% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,505 | 3.5% |
| 100th | Italy | 2,511 | -0.9% |
| 101st | Spain | 2,563 | 0.4% |
| 102nd | Israel | 2,569 | -1.5% |
| 103rd | Bulgaria | 2,607 | -1.2% |
| 104th | Hungary | 2,613 | 1.6% |
| 105th | Poland | 2,615 | 4.7% |
| 106th | Belarus | 2,639 | -0.8% |
| 107th | United Kingdom | 2,697 | -2.8% |
| 108th | Malaysia | 2,759 | 1.9% |
| 109th | Switzerland | 2,820 | -3.7% |
| 110th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,861 | 4.5% |
| 111th | Denmark | 2,891 | 1.5% |
| 112th | Ireland | 2,932 | 3.8% |
| 113th | Libya | 3,119 | -3.5% |
| 114th | Slovak Republic | 3,160 | 0.9% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,194 | 0.6% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,297 | 3.2% |
| 117th | Japan | 3,371 | -0.9% |
| 118th | Kazakhstan | 3,389 | 11.1% |
| 119th | Turkmenistan | 3,590 | -3.6% |
| 120th | France | 3,718 | -2.1% |
| 121st | Germany | 3,765 | -0.4% |
| 122nd | Austria | 3,797 | 0.0% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 3,928 | -1.4% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,266 | -3.5% |
| 125th | Netherlands | 4,352 | 1.3% |
| 126th | Estonia | 4,579 | 23.9% |
| 127th | Sweden | 4,859 | 6.2% |
| 128th | Belgium | 4,904 | 5.2% |
| 129th | Russian Federation | 4,918 | 2.8% |
| 130th | Australia | 5,217 | -1.9% |
| 131st | Norway | 5,369 | 8.9% |
| 132nd | Korea | 5,391 | 2.9% |
| 133rd | Singapore | 5,449 | 3.9% |
| 134th | Oman | 5,557 | -7.8% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,121 | 3.4% |
| 136th | Luxembourg | 6,343 | -3.1% |
| 137th | Gibraltar | 6,577 | 3.5% |
| 138th | United States | 6,663 | -1.9% |
| 139th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,008 | 8.9% |
| 140th | Saudi Arabia | 7,522 | -3.4% |
| 141st | Canada | 7,945 | 3.3% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,685 | -0.5% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 9,879 | -5.1% |
| 144th | United Arab Emirates | 10,356 | 2.1% |
| 145th | Trinidad and Tobago | 12,251 | -12.8% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 12,894 | -15.0% |
| 147th | Qatar | 15,179 | -7.6% |
| 148th | Iceland | 15,701 | -7.2% |
FAQ
What was South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2016?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2016 was 71. This ranked 1st globally.
How did South Sudan's energy use per capita change in 2016?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita decreased by 7.3% in 2016 compared to 2015.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2016?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2016 at 15,701.
What is the energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2016?▾
The energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2016 was 71. This ranked 1st globally.
How does 2016 compare to 2015 for South Sudan's energy use per capita?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita went from 76 in 2015 to 71 in 2016, a 7.3% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
South Sudan matched the Currency Crisis Pattern pattern in 2016. Historically: 128 occurrences, 35 successful (27%). Outcome 24 months later: 83.5%. View full analysis →
Related
2015
2017
All years
Full ranking 2016
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2018
Lowest: 2012
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Yemen, Republic of
vs Afghanistan
vs Burundi
vs Eritrea
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking