South Sudan - Energy Use per Capita 2017
70
−1 from 2016
South Sudan's energy use per capita was 70 in 2017, decreased +1 from 71 in 2016. This was the 1st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2017▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | South Sudan | 70 | -1.2% |
| 2nd | Yemen, Republic of | 72 | -13.7% |
| 3rd | Niger | 144 | -2.5% |
| 4th | Chad | 204 | -4.0% |
| 5th | Bangladesh | 261 | 1.9% |
| 6th | Senegal | 278 | -3.1% |
| 7th | Eritrea | 278 | 0.3% |
| 8th | Burkina Faso | 285 | 5.0% |
| 9th | Madagascar | 299 | 2.1% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 316 | -4.4% |
| 11th | Ghana | 322 | -1.9% |
| 12th | Tajikistan | 329 | 0.7% |
| 13th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 342 | -3.5% |
| 14th | Rwanda | 352 | 1.3% |
| 15th | Mozambique | 372 | -2.4% |
| 16th | Côte d'Ivoire | 393 | 0.2% |
| 17th | Cameroon | 393 | -1.8% |
| 18th | Togo | 404 | -4.5% |
| 19th | Tanzania | 406 | -2.4% |
| 20th | Haiti | 411 | 0.5% |
| 21st | Benin | 412 | 0.8% |
| 22nd | Zimbabwe | 416 | -1.7% |
| 23rd | Cambodia | 419 | 1.5% |
| 24th | Myanmar | 429 | 14.1% |
| 25th | Sudan | 443 | -1.2% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 456 | 2.1% |
| 27th | Angola | 457 | -1.3% |
| 28th | Uganda | 469 | -1.1% |
| 29th | Nepal | 484 | 5.6% |
| 30th | Sri Lanka | 514 | -5.2% |
| 31st | Honduras | 538 | -12.8% |
| 32nd | Kenya | 539 | 1.0% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 544 | 4.5% |
| 34th | Congo, Republic of | 548 | -2.4% |
| 35th | Morocco | 578 | 3.5% |
| 36th | Syrian Arab Republic | 596 | 12.4% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 610 | -2.3% |
| 38th | Nicaragua | 632 | 0.9% |
| 39th | India | 648 | 3.3% |
| 40th | El Salvador | 675 | -1.8% |
| 41st | Zambia | 703 | 2.8% |
| 42nd | Namibia | 715 | -5.9% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 755 | 5.1% |
| 44th | Viet Nam | 757 | 2.5% |
| 45th | Peru | 762 | -0.3% |
| 46th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 769 | 87.7% |
| 47th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 801 | 2.8% |
| 48th | Lao PDR | 812 | 7.7% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 818 | -1.9% |
| 50th | Dominican Republic | 824 | -2.2% |
| 51st | Colombia | 859 | -5.7% |
| 52nd | Albania | 894 | 6.4% |
| 53rd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 897 | 2.8% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 898 | 1.4% |
| 55th | Jordan | 917 | 3.3% |
| 56th | Jamaica | 920 | -7.9% |
| 57th | Cuba | 923 | -3.9% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 973 | -2.8% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 974 | 2.0% |
| 60th | Eswatini | 997 | -3.7% |
| 61st | Panama | 1,036 | -0.9% |
| 62nd | Armenia | 1,106 | 6.0% |
| 63rd | Paraguay | 1,116 | 4.1% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,156 | 1.8% |
| 65th | Iraq | 1,186 | 10.1% |
| 66th | Uzbekistan | 1,253 | 3.6% |
| 67th | Botswana | 1,280 | 2.8% |
| 68th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,291 | -14.5% |
| 69th | Georgia | 1,313 | 0.9% |
| 70th | Algeria | 1,380 | 0.7% |
| 71st | Moldova | 1,398 | 3.0% |
| 72nd | Brazil | 1,432 | 1.2% |
| 73rd | North Macedonia | 1,438 | 2.1% |
| 74th | Malta | 1,451 | 10.6% |
| 75th | Lebanon | 1,476 | 8.8% |
| 76th | Mexico | 1,478 | -3.1% |
| 77th | Azerbaijan | 1,479 | -0.1% |
| 78th | Uruguay | 1,513 | -2.5% |
| 79th | Mongolia | 1,604 | 1.0% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,614 | -6.6% |
| 81st | Montenegro | 1,625 | 4.7% |
| 82nd | Romania | 1,693 | 5.5% |
| 83rd | Cyprus | 1,794 | 1.8% |
| 84th | Türkiye | 1,828 | 6.0% |
| 85th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,868 | -10.3% |
| 86th | Argentina | 1,875 | -0.8% |
| 87th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,967 | 1.1% |
| 88th | Ukraine | 1,968 | -2.0% |
| 89th | Thailand | 1,988 | 0.2% |
| 90th | Chile | 2,066 | -0.2% |
| 91st | Greece | 2,148 | 1.8% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,160 | 5.0% |
| 93rd | Portugal | 2,210 | 4.7% |
| 94th | China | 2,216 | 3.1% |
| 95th | Serbia | 2,225 | 2.7% |
| 96th | Gabon | 2,264 | -9.1% |
| 97th | Latvia | 2,265 | 4.3% |
| 98th | South Africa | 2,283 | -1.2% |
| 99th | Israel | 2,482 | -3.4% |
| 100th | Italy | 2,557 | 1.8% |
| 101st | Malaysia | 2,618 | -5.1% |
| 102nd | Lithuania | 2,653 | 5.9% |
| 103rd | United Kingdom | 2,659 | -1.4% |
| 104th | Spain | 2,690 | 5.0% |
| 105th | Belarus | 2,693 | 2.0% |
| 106th | Bulgaria | 2,732 | 4.8% |
| 107th | Poland | 2,734 | 4.6% |
| 108th | Hungary | 2,737 | 4.8% |
| 109th | Switzerland | 2,809 | -0.4% |
| 110th | Ireland | 2,855 | -2.6% |
| 111th | Denmark | 2,897 | 0.2% |
| 112th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3,028 | 5.9% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,244 | 1.6% |
| 114th | Slovak Republic | 3,317 | 5.0% |
| 115th | Slovenia | 3,391 | 2.8% |
| 116th | Japan | 3,391 | 0.6% |
| 117th | Kazakhstan | 3,404 | 0.4% |
| 118th | Libya | 3,486 | 11.8% |
| 119th | Turkmenistan | 3,558 | -0.9% |
| 120th | France | 3,705 | -0.3% |
| 121st | Germany | 3,763 | -0.1% |
| 122nd | Austria | 3,840 | 1.1% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,090 | 4.1% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,201 | -1.5% |
| 125th | Netherlands | 4,365 | 0.3% |
| 126th | Estonia | 4,445 | -2.9% |
| 127th | Belgium | 4,864 | -0.8% |
| 128th | Sweden | 4,927 | 1.4% |
| 129th | Russian Federation | 4,999 | 1.7% |
| 130th | Australia | 5,162 | -1.0% |
| 131st | Korea | 5,468 | 1.4% |
| 132nd | Norway | 5,674 | 5.7% |
| 133rd | Oman | 5,765 | 3.7% |
| 134th | Singapore | 5,799 | 6.4% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,070 | -0.8% |
| 136th | Luxembourg | 6,313 | -0.5% |
| 137th | United States | 6,591 | -1.1% |
| 138th | Gibraltar | 6,891 | 4.8% |
| 139th | Saudi Arabia | 7,707 | 2.5% |
| 140th | Canada | 8,175 | 2.9% |
| 141st | Brunei Darussalam | 8,385 | 19.6% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,521 | -17.7% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 9,444 | -4.4% |
| 144th | Kuwait | 9,527 | -1.6% |
| 145th | Curaçao | 10,613 | -17.7% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 12,331 | 0.7% |
| 147th | Iceland | 16,235 | 3.4% |
| 148th | Qatar | 16,718 | 10.1% |
FAQ
What was South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2017?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita in 2017 was 70. This ranked 1st globally.
How did South Sudan's energy use per capita change in 2017?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita decreased by 1.2% in 2017 compared to 2016.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2017?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2017 at 16,718.
What is the energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2017?▾
The energy use per capita of South Sudan in 2017 was 70. This ranked 1st globally.
How does 2017 compare to 2016 for South Sudan's energy use per capita?▾
South Sudan's energy use per capita went from 71 in 2016 to 70 in 2017, a 1.2% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
South Sudan matched the Currency Crisis Pattern pattern in 2017. Historically: 128 occurrences, 35 successful (27%). Outcome 24 months later: 87.2%. View full analysis →
Related
2016
2018
All years
Full ranking 2017
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2018
Lowest: 2012
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Yemen, Republic of
vs Afghanistan
vs Burundi
vs Eritrea
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking