Suriname - Energy Use per Capita 2011
1,677
+326 from 2010
Suriname's energy use per capita was 1,677 in 2011, increased +326 from 1,351 in 2010. This was the 80th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2011▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 113 | -16.2% |
| 2nd | Bangladesh | 200 | 2.4% |
| 3rd | Chad | 209 | -4.8% |
| 4th | Burkina Faso | 236 | 3.4% |
| 5th | Yemen, Republic of | 240 | -17.7% |
| 6th | Eritrea | 259 | 4.0% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 259 | 1.5% |
| 8th | Tajikistan | 279 | -1.9% |
| 9th | Myanmar | 280 | 0.5% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 297 | 2.6% |
| 11th | Ghana | 303 | 2.5% |
| 12th | Senegal | 317 | 1.3% |
| 13th | Cambodia | 325 | 0.6% |
| 14th | Rwanda | 350 | 0.4% |
| 15th | Benin | 353 | -3.0% |
| 16th | Cameroon | 363 | 2.0% |
| 17th | Mozambique | 371 | 16.7% |
| 18th | Nigeria | 376 | 12.4% |
| 19th | Nepal | 385 | 3.1% |
| 20th | Haiti | 402 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Côte d'Ivoire | 412 | 11.5% |
| 22nd | Pakistan | 423 | -1.5% |
| 23rd | Lao PDR | 424 | -0.3% |
| 24th | Philippines | 428 | -0.7% |
| 25th | Uganda | 429 | 1.9% |
| 26th | Tanzania | 433 | 2.9% |
| 27th | Zimbabwe | 445 | 5.9% |
| 28th | Togo | 453 | -2.1% |
| 29th | Sudan | 467 | 5.1% |
| 30th | Sri Lanka | 472 | 1.0% |
| 31st | Kenya | 473 | 0.7% |
| 32nd | Congo, Republic of | 484 | 28.9% |
| 33rd | Angola | 486 | -0.2% |
| 34th | Nicaragua | 531 | 0.4% |
| 35th | India | 547 | 2.8% |
| 36th | Morocco | 559 | 6.3% |
| 37th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 563 | -25.1% |
| 38th | Kyrgyz Republic | 597 | 18.5% |
| 39th | Honduras | 607 | 8.1% |
| 40th | Zambia | 646 | 2.7% |
| 41st | Namibia | 657 | 0.7% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 660 | 5.6% |
| 43rd | Viet Nam | 664 | -1.0% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 665 | -0.6% |
| 45th | Peru | 688 | 14.0% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 693 | -0.7% |
| 47th | Colombia | 710 | 1.4% |
| 48th | Guatemala | 714 | 0.0% |
| 49th | Albania | 767 | 4.9% |
| 50th | Dominican Republic | 780 | 0.9% |
| 51st | Paraguay | 846 | 0.1% |
| 52nd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 860 | 2.6% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 891 | 2.8% |
| 54th | Armenia | 897 | 10.0% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 903 | -5.5% |
| 56th | Syrian Arab Republic | 904 | -6.2% |
| 57th | Jamaica | 924 | 5.6% |
| 58th | Georgia | 944 | 14.4% |
| 59th | Jordan | 944 | -3.0% |
| 60th | Cuba | 970 | -3.0% |
| 61st | Costa Rica | 993 | -0.6% |
| 62nd | Eswatini | 1,002 | 19.8% |
| 63rd | Panama | 1,038 | 9.4% |
| 64th | Mauritius | 1,054 | 0.3% |
| 65th | Botswana | 1,070 | -5.4% |
| 66th | Iraq | 1,125 | 5.8% |
| 67th | Algeria | 1,174 | 2.0% |
| 68th | Lebanon | 1,257 | -1.2% |
| 69th | Moldova | 1,322 | 1.5% |
| 70th | Uruguay | 1,328 | 8.2% |
| 71st | Brazil | 1,390 | 0.4% |
| 72nd | Azerbaijan | 1,396 | 6.9% |
| 73rd | Kosovo | 1,411 | 1.1% |
| 74th | Equatorial Guinea | 1,451 | 7.3% |
| 75th | Türkiye | 1,516 | 4.9% |
| 76th | Mongolia | 1,521 | 7.8% |
| 77th | Uzbekistan | 1,603 | 0.6% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,620 | 9.8% |
| 79th | Mexico | 1,633 | 3.2% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,677 | 24.1% |
| 81st | Thailand | 1,705 | -0.8% |
| 82nd | Romania | 1,772 | 2.7% |
| 83rd | Montenegro | 1,811 | -0.5% |
| 84th | Argentina | 1,865 | 2.1% |
| 85th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,910 | 12.3% |
| 86th | Chile | 1,937 | 7.9% |
| 87th | Malta | 2,002 | -1.0% |
| 88th | China | 2,027 | 6.7% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,038 | 6.0% |
| 90th | Latvia | 2,067 | -3.8% |
| 91st | Cyprus | 2,093 | -4.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,137 | -2.0% |
| 93rd | Portugal | 2,164 | -2.6% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,241 | 4.5% |
| 95th | Gabon | 2,296 | -22.4% |
| 96th | Lithuania | 2,413 | 6.0% |
| 97th | Greece | 2,413 | -3.0% |
| 98th | South Africa | 2,536 | 0.7% |
| 99th | Malaysia | 2,591 | 2.4% |
| 100th | Bulgaria | 2,593 | 8.3% |
| 101st | Hungary | 2,601 | -1.9% |
| 102nd | Libya | 2,632 | -16.0% |
| 103rd | Poland | 2,653 | 0.4% |
| 104th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,658 | 0.7% |
| 105th | Spain | 2,684 | -1.9% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,733 | -4.1% |
| 107th | Italy | 2,798 | -3.7% |
| 108th | Ireland | 2,875 | -8.7% |
| 109th | United Kingdom | 2,974 | -8.1% |
| 110th | Israel | 2,981 | -2.0% |
| 111th | Belarus | 3,082 | 6.4% |
| 112th | Switzerland | 3,181 | -4.3% |
| 113th | Denmark | 3,219 | -8.0% |
| 114th | Slovak Republic | 3,339 | -3.0% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,353 | -3.0% |
| 116th | Slovenia | 3,581 | -0.2% |
| 117th | Japan | 3,620 | -7.2% |
| 118th | Germany | 3,892 | -3.4% |
| 119th | Austria | 3,928 | -3.4% |
| 120th | France | 3,951 | -2.2% |
| 121st | Singapore | 4,086 | -15.9% |
| 122nd | New Zealand | 4,108 | -0.9% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,144 | -3.8% |
| 124th | Estonia | 4,312 | -2.4% |
| 125th | Turkmenistan | 4,315 | 5.8% |
| 126th | Kazakhstan | 4,532 | 10.4% |
| 127th | Netherlands | 4,612 | -7.4% |
| 128th | Russian Federation | 5,004 | 3.1% |
| 129th | Belgium | 5,063 | -8.1% |
| 130th | Korea | 5,115 | 4.0% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,281 | -3.0% |
| 132nd | Gibraltar | 5,303 | -4.2% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,502 | -14.8% |
| 134th | Australia | 5,699 | -1.1% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,523 | -4.3% |
| 136th | United States | 7,010 | -2.1% |
| 137th | Oman | 7,156 | 6.2% |
| 138th | Canada | 7,716 | 0.7% |
| 139th | Saudi Arabia | 7,979 | 0.2% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,063 | -3.3% |
| 141st | United Arab Emirates | 8,558 | -4.3% |
| 142nd | Brunei Darussalam | 9,699 | 17.4% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 10,505 | -7.1% |
| 144th | Bahrain | 10,624 | 3.0% |
| 145th | Curaçao | 14,347 | 7.4% |
| 146th | Trinidad and Tobago | 14,839 | -1.2% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,473 | -1.8% |
| 148th | Iceland | 18,162 | 6.7% |
FAQ
What was Suriname's energy use per capita in 2011?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita in 2011 was 1,677. This ranked 80th globally.
How did Suriname's energy use per capita change in 2011?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita increased by 24.1% in 2011 compared to 2010.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2011?▾
Iceland had the highest energy use per capita in 2011 at 18,162.
What is the energy use per capita of Suriname in 2011?▾
The energy use per capita of Suriname in 2011 was 1,677. This ranked 80th globally.
How does 2011 compare to 2010 for Suriname's energy use per capita?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita went from 1,351 in 2010 to 1,677 in 2011, a 24.1% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Suriname matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2011. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 1.9%. View full analysis →
Related
2010
2012
All years
Full ranking 2011
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2014
Lowest: 2002
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Fiji
vs Libya
vs Paraguay
vs Botswana
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking