Suriname - Energy Use per Capita 2002
963
−389 from 2001
Suriname's energy use per capita was 963 in 2002, decreased +389 from 1,352 in 2001. This was the 66th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2002▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | 0.1% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 140 | 1.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | -0.2% |
| 4th | Madagascar | 236 | -7.2% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 239 | -1.7% |
| 6th | Chad | 240 | -0.9% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 245 | -6.0% |
| 8th | Senegal | 250 | -1.5% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 272 | -1.5% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 277 | 0.4% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 281 | 2.3% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 284 | 0.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 295 | 4.1% |
| 14th | Eritrea | 300 | -7.1% |
| 15th | Ghana | 304 | -3.0% |
| 16th | Lao PDR | 309 | 1.2% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 326 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Nepal | 334 | -0.4% |
| 19th | Haiti | 361 | 1.8% |
| 20th | Côte d'Ivoire | 374 | 4.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 387 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | India | 397 | 1.0% |
| 23rd | Togo | 403 | 1.0% |
| 24th | Pakistan | 404 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 406 | 2.2% |
| 26th | Morocco | 407 | 0.3% |
| 27th | Rwanda | 408 | 0.4% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 409 | 0.6% |
| 29th | Sri Lanka | 414 | 0.8% |
| 30th | Viet Nam | 425 | 8.0% |
| 31st | Angola | 429 | 0.2% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 430 | 2.3% |
| 33rd | Kenya | 445 | -1.6% |
| 34th | Equatorial Guinea | 451 | 30.3% |
| 35th | Philippines | 451 | -0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 478 | -1.0% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 485 | 11.3% |
| 38th | Honduras | 489 | 2.0% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 493 | -1.2% |
| 40th | Sudan | 518 | 4.7% |
| 41st | Zimbabwe | 520 | -3.8% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 520 | 17.0% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 582 | 2.5% |
| 44th | Armenia | 586 | -6.1% |
| 45th | Namibia | 602 | -9.4% |
| 46th | Zambia | 604 | 1.3% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 606 | 2.6% |
| 48th | Colombia | 634 | -3.5% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 637 | 0.4% |
| 50th | Georgia | 639 | -0.1% |
| 51st | Albania | 661 | 10.5% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 692 | 12.0% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 709 | 6.1% |
| 54th | Paraguay | 740 | -2.2% |
| 55th | Costa Rica | 749 | 3.9% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 772 | -7.2% |
| 57th | Tunisia | 784 | 0.3% |
| 58th | Panama | 791 | -10.8% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 817 | -4.5% |
| 60th | Mauritius | 873 | -1.5% |
| 61st | Dominican Republic | 882 | 7.6% |
| 62nd | Eswatini | 895 | -0.2% |
| 63rd | Jordan | 901 | 2.8% |
| 64th | Algeria | 911 | 5.6% |
| 65th | Syrian Arab Republic | 942 | 1.4% |
| 66th | Suriname | 963 | -28.7% |
| 67th | China | 976 | 5.9% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 1,026 | 5.6% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,035 | -0.9% |
| 70th | Cuba | 1,038 | -7.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,052 | 4.7% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,058 | -0.3% |
| 73rd | Moldova | 1,063 | 1.7% |
| 74th | Iraq | 1,093 | -7.7% |
| 75th | Brazil | 1,103 | 1.5% |
| 76th | Türkiye | 1,107 | 4.4% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,175 | -2.0% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,251 | -1.2% |
| 79th | Thailand | 1,286 | 9.5% |
| 80th | Jamaica | 1,291 | -4.9% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,415 | 0.3% |
| 82nd | Gabon | 1,417 | 17.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,484 | -2.3% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,557 | -0.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,612 | 2.4% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,755 | 5.3% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,763 | 0.2% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,852 | -7.5% |
| 89th | Uzbekistan | 1,908 | 2.4% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,934 | -6.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,030 | 2.6% |
| 92nd | South Africa | 2,072 | -5.0% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,082 | 2.4% |
| 94th | Serbia | 2,098 | 6.8% |
| 95th | Malaysia | 2,154 | 0.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,194 | -0.4% |
| 97th | Turkmenistan | 2,215 | -18.0% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,313 | -1.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,410 | -0.4% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,478 | 3.6% |
| 101st | Hungary | 2,520 | 0.3% |
| 102nd | Kazakhstan | 2,538 | 14.5% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,561 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Lithuania | 2,579 | 8.0% |
| 105th | Greece | 2,604 | 0.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,786 | 2.0% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,863 | -3.7% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,036 | 0.5% |
| 109th | Libya | 3,090 | 0.5% |
| 110th | Spain | 3,096 | 1.5% |
| 111th | Estonia | 3,376 | -6.0% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,469 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,484 | 0.8% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,485 | 0.0% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,510 | -0.1% |
| 116th | Denmark | 3,536 | -1.4% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,538 | -3.3% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,663 | -1.4% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,717 | -1.8% |
| 120th | Austria | 3,772 | 0.3% |
| 121st | Japan | 3,993 | 0.1% |
| 122nd | Korea | 4,093 | 4.3% |
| 123rd | Germany | 4,109 | -2.4% |
| 124th | Czechia | 4,201 | 1.5% |
| 125th | France | 4,220 | -0.5% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,289 | 0.0% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,326 | -1.7% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,773 | 1.6% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,805 | 0.4% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,066 | -1.6% |
| 131st | Belgium | 5,398 | -3.7% |
| 132nd | Australia | 5,480 | -0.1% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,502 | -7.6% |
| 134th | Sweden | 5,826 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,345 | -4.2% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,723 | 4.9% |
| 137th | Saudi Arabia | 6,827 | 7.5% |
| 138th | United States | 7,840 | 0.2% |
| 139th | Canada | 7,943 | -0.9% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,205 | 2.7% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,991 | 7.8% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,711 | -1.5% |
| 143rd | United Arab Emirates | 10,866 | -7.2% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,168 | 2.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,215 | -3.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,514 | -1.8% |
| 147th | Qatar | 19,201 | 7.8% |
FAQ
What was Suriname's energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita in 2002 was 963. This ranked 66th globally.
How did Suriname's energy use per capita change in 2002?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita decreased by 28.7% in 2002 compared to 2001.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2002?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2002 at 19,201.
What is the energy use per capita of Suriname in 2002?▾
The energy use per capita of Suriname in 2002 was 963. This ranked 66th globally.
How does 2002 compare to 2001 for Suriname's energy use per capita?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita went from 1,352 in 2001 to 963 in 2002, a 28.7% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Suriname matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2002. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 10.0%. View full analysis →
Related
2001
2003
All years
Full ranking 2002
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2014
Lowest: 2002
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Fiji
vs Libya
vs Paraguay
vs Botswana
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking