Zambia - Energy Use per Capita 1996
642
−22 from 1995
Zambia's energy use per capita was 642 in 1996, decreased +22 from 663 in 1995. This was the 48th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1996▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Bangladesh | 128 | -1.0% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 162 | -6.5% |
| 3rd | Niger | 173 | 1.1% |
| 4th | Yemen, Republic of | 202 | -1.3% |
| 5th | Senegal | 211 | -0.1% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 247 | 1.3% |
| 7th | Equatorial Guinea | 255 | 3.7% |
| 8th | Nigeria | 268 | 4.3% |
| 9th | Congo, Republic of | 268 | -8.3% |
| 10th | Cambodia | 270 | -4.5% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 274 | -1.1% |
| 12th | Chad | 278 | -0.7% |
| 13th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 293 | 1.4% |
| 14th | Nepal | 302 | 0.2% |
| 15th | Viet Nam | 316 | 4.0% |
| 16th | Benin | 337 | 13.4% |
| 17th | Haiti | 344 | 1.7% |
| 18th | Tajikistan | 354 | -5.3% |
| 19th | Tanzania | 360 | -0.5% |
| 20th | Morocco | 366 | 3.5% |
| 21st | India | 368 | 1.7% |
| 22nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 375 | 8.1% |
| 23rd | Sri Lanka | 375 | 9.8% |
| 24th | Ghana | 376 | 1.0% |
| 25th | Togo | 384 | 8.0% |
| 26th | Mozambique | 385 | -1.1% |
| 27th | Uganda | 401 | 0.8% |
| 28th | Pakistan | 404 | 1.6% |
| 29th | Cameroon | 423 | -0.3% |
| 30th | Albania | 448 | 7.4% |
| 31st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 450 | 12.0% |
| 32nd | Peru | 455 | 1.1% |
| 33rd | Angola | 456 | -1.0% |
| 34th | Kenya | 461 | 0.8% |
| 35th | Philippines | 463 | 0.9% |
| 36th | Honduras | 480 | -2.4% |
| 37th | Nicaragua | 486 | 0.0% |
| 38th | Sudan | 486 | 0.2% |
| 39th | Eritrea | 492 | -0.1% |
| 40th | Guatemala | 517 | 0.2% |
| 41st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 521 | 9.8% |
| 42nd | Armenia | 543 | 9.2% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 553 | -5.2% |
| 44th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 579 | 3.8% |
| 45th | Indonesia | 587 | 2.2% |
| 46th | Kyrgyz Republic | 596 | 13.9% |
| 47th | Namibia | 598 | 4.5% |
| 48th | Zambia | 642 | -3.3% |
| 49th | Tunisia | 653 | 3.0% |
| 50th | Costa Rica | 654 | -1.9% |
| 51st | Dominican Republic | 681 | 2.5% |
| 52nd | Ecuador | 702 | 3.4% |
| 53rd | Mauritius | 702 | 0.8% |
| 54th | Panama | 763 | 4.7% |
| 55th | Colombia | 789 | 0.4% |
| 56th | Algeria | 809 | -5.1% |
| 57th | Georgia | 834 | 4.3% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 844 | -12.9% |
| 59th | Syrian Arab Republic | 850 | 2.8% |
| 60th | Paraguay | 855 | -0.1% |
| 61st | Zimbabwe | 878 | -2.1% |
| 62nd | Uruguay | 884 | 9.8% |
| 63rd | China | 885 | 1.4% |
| 64th | Eswatini | 896 | -9.6% |
| 65th | Jordan | 898 | -0.7% |
| 66th | Botswana | 919 | -4.8% |
| 67th | Rwanda | 919 | -12.2% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 985 | -17.3% |
| 69th | Brazil | 1,036 | 3.7% |
| 70th | Türkiye | 1,073 | 7.5% |
| 71st | Cuba | 1,082 | 8.8% |
| 72nd | Lebanon | 1,156 | 3.6% |
| 73rd | Thailand | 1,161 | 10.3% |
| 74th | Gabon | 1,212 | 1.5% |
| 75th | Jamaica | 1,257 | 4.5% |
| 76th | Moldova | 1,376 | -13.9% |
| 77th | Chile | 1,379 | 9.2% |
| 78th | Mexico | 1,467 | 0.4% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,468 | 17.3% |
| 80th | Iraq | 1,477 | -6.6% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,514 | -16.3% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,534 | 1.8% |
| 83rd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,552 | -4.6% |
| 84th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1,697 | -4.7% |
| 85th | Uzbekistan | 1,745 | 1.8% |
| 86th | Croatia | 1,798 | 9.8% |
| 87th | Malaysia | 1,805 | 8.1% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,837 | -2.3% |
| 89th | Latvia | 1,840 | -0.5% |
| 90th | Portugal | 1,987 | -1.3% |
| 91st | Romania | 2,116 | 3.0% |
| 92nd | Serbia | 2,142 | 20.2% |
| 93rd | Cyprus | 2,153 | 9.1% |
| 94th | Greece | 2,206 | 2.7% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,395 | 1.6% |
| 96th | Spain | 2,489 | -1.9% |
| 97th | Belarus | 2,507 | 3.1% |
| 98th | Hungary | 2,573 | 2.8% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,610 | 8.7% |
| 100th | Poland | 2,680 | 4.0% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | 2,746 | 0.0% |
| 102nd | Kazakhstan | 2,763 | -11.5% |
| 103rd | Italy | 2,796 | -0.1% |
| 104th | Israel | 2,801 | 0.2% |
| 105th | Turkmenistan | 2,806 | -14.1% |
| 106th | Oman | 2,894 | 0.6% |
| 107th | Ukraine | 2,928 | -7.6% |
| 108th | Libya | 2,938 | 3.1% |
| 109th | Ireland | 3,123 | 5.8% |
| 110th | Slovenia | 3,180 | 4.3% |
| 111th | Slovak Republic | 3,364 | 1.5% |
| 112th | Switzerland | 3,460 | 1.6% |
| 113th | Korea | 3,461 | 7.0% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,465 | 3.2% |
| 115th | Austria | 3,581 | 6.1% |
| 116th | United Kingdom | 3,880 | 4.0% |
| 117th | Gibraltar | 3,887 | 1.5% |
| 118th | Japan | 3,990 | 1.9% |
| 119th | Estonia | 4,153 | 6.0% |
| 120th | Denmark | 4,172 | 12.5% |
| 121st | Czechia | 4,173 | 3.2% |
| 122nd | New Zealand | 4,173 | 2.0% |
| 123rd | France | 4,187 | 5.3% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,247 | 3.1% |
| 125th | Russian Federation | 4,255 | -0.9% |
| 126th | Netherlands | 4,950 | 4.6% |
| 127th | Norway | 5,202 | -3.5% |
| 128th | Singapore | 5,360 | 0.2% |
| 129th | Australia | 5,430 | 5.7% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,528 | 5.1% |
| 131st | Trinidad and Tobago | 5,652 | 22.3% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,825 | 2.2% |
| 133rd | Finland | 6,070 | 7.2% |
| 134th | Saudi Arabia | 6,494 | 2.8% |
| 135th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,585 | -1.7% |
| 136th | Luxembourg | 7,711 | 0.1% |
| 137th | United States | 7,842 | 1.0% |
| 138th | Canada | 8,071 | 0.9% |
| 139th | Kuwait | 8,368 | -4.4% |
| 140th | Iceland | 8,991 | 7.0% |
| 141st | Curaçao | 9,222 | 1.8% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 11,250 | -1.0% |
| 143rd | Bahrain | 11,566 | 0.2% |
| 144th | Qatar | 16,355 | 3.2% |
FAQ
What was Zambia's energy use per capita in 1996?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita in 1996 was 642. This ranked 48th globally.
How did Zambia's energy use per capita change in 1996?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita decreased by 3.3% in 1996 compared to 1995.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 1996?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 1996 at 16,355.
What is the energy use per capita of Zambia in 1996?▾
The energy use per capita of Zambia in 1996 was 642. This ranked 48th globally.
How does 1996 compare to 1995 for Zambia's energy use per capita?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita went from 663 in 1995 to 642 in 1996, a 3.3% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Zambia matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 1996. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 24.5%. View full analysis →
Related
1995
1997
All years
Full ranking 1996
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 2000
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Uganda
vs Tanzania
vs Guinea-Bissau
vs Nigeria
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking