Zambia - Energy Use per Capita 2000
596
−33 from 1999
Zambia's energy use per capita was 596 in 2000, decreased +33 from 629 in 1999. This was the 48th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Burkina Faso | 123 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Niger | 128 | -37.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 136 | 0.8% |
| 4th | Congo, Republic of | 226 | -4.3% |
| 5th | Senegal | 241 | 3.8% |
| 6th | Chad | 242 | -2.6% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 242 | 2.9% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 256 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 273 | 0.6% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 274 | 0.6% |
| 11th | Benin | 275 | -16.3% |
| 12th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 275 | -2.9% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 284 | 2.0% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 297 | - |
| 15th | Eritrea | 315 | -0.6% |
| 16th | Ghana | 322 | -19.7% |
| 17th | Nepal | 330 | 3.8% |
| 18th | Tajikistan | 342 | -5.2% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 343 | 15.2% |
| 20th | Haiti | 368 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Viet Nam | 372 | 4.0% |
| 22nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 384 | -6.0% |
| 23rd | Uganda | 387 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Morocco | 388 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 394 | 2.7% |
| 26th | India | 395 | 0.5% |
| 27th | Mozambique | 396 | 3.2% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | -21.1% |
| 29th | Togo | 411 | -2.9% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 412 | 0.2% |
| 31st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 424 | -20.9% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 426 | 1.5% |
| 33rd | Angola | 428 | -1.4% |
| 34th | Sri Lanka | 432 | 8.1% |
| 35th | Honduras | 456 | -3.0% |
| 36th | Kenya | 460 | 0.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 473 | -5.0% |
| 38th | Sudan | 487 | -6.0% |
| 39th | Philippines | 487 | 0.9% |
| 40th | Nicaragua | 500 | 1.0% |
| 41st | Peru | 506 | -1.3% |
| 42nd | El Salvador | 537 | -16.2% |
| 43rd | Zimbabwe | 556 | -38.1% |
| 44th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 570 | -7.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 576 | -1.0% |
| 46th | Albania | 581 | 0.8% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 586 | -0.2% |
| 48th | Zambia | 596 | -5.3% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 616 | 2.5% |
| 50th | Armenia | 626 | 8.0% |
| 51st | Ecuador | 639 | 0.1% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 668 | -1.3% |
| 53rd | Georgia | 704 | 5.1% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 730 | 7.2% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 748 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Paraguay | 757 | -8.2% |
| 57th | Panama | 791 | -7.4% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 833 | 6.3% |
| 59th | Mauritius | 851 | 9.7% |
| 60th | Dominican Republic | 856 | 7.4% |
| 61st | Kosovo | 857 | - |
| 62nd | Algeria | 874 | 0.2% |
| 63rd | China | 898 | 2.0% |
| 64th | Jordan | 903 | 2.5% |
| 65th | Eswatini | 914 | -5.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 928 | -2.1% |
| 67th | Uruguay | 949 | -4.7% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 979 | 5.0% |
| 69th | Moldova | 986 | -7.3% |
| 70th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,045 | 30.2% |
| 71st | Botswana | 1,070 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Brazil | 1,081 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Iraq | 1,091 | 13.7% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,137 | -10.7% |
| 75th | Cuba | 1,147 | 6.8% |
| 76th | Thailand | 1,153 | 1.2% |
| 77th | Gabon | 1,153 | -2.1% |
| 78th | Türkiye | 1,166 | 8.0% |
| 79th | Suriname | 1,280 | - |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 1,317 | -2.0% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,339 | 2.3% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,404 | 2.5% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,541 | -0.9% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,615 | 0.1% |
| 85th | Latvia | 1,619 | -2.7% |
| 86th | Chile | 1,623 | -0.6% |
| 87th | Argentina | 1,643 | -1.4% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,732 | -10.9% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,801 | 8.7% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,852 | -4.0% |
| 91st | Uzbekistan | 1,867 | 1.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 1,883 | -2.7% |
| 93rd | Lithuania | 2,041 | -9.8% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,102 | 11.6% |
| 95th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,121 | -11.3% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,265 | 5.7% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,269 | -4.1% |
| 98th | Bulgaria | 2,277 | 2.1% |
| 99th | Kazakhstan | 2,302 | -1.0% |
| 100th | Poland | 2,322 | -3.1% |
| 101st | Portugal | 2,390 | 0.0% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,448 | -1.7% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,472 | 2.1% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,512 | 5.0% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,700 | -0.1% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,899 | 5.9% |
| 107th | Libya | 2,977 | 4.3% |
| 108th | Spain | 2,991 | 3.9% |
| 109th | Italy | 3,012 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Turkmenistan | 3,248 | -1.7% |
| 111th | Slovenia | 3,281 | 1.2% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,286 | 5.1% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,293 | 0.6% |
| 114th | Estonia | 3,378 | -4.7% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,427 | 0.5% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,467 | -1.9% |
| 117th | Denmark | 3,491 | -3.1% |
| 118th | Austria | 3,571 | -0.6% |
| 119th | Ireland | 3,627 | 2.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.1% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,952 | 7.8% |
| 122nd | Czechia | 4,022 | 5.6% |
| 123rd | Japan | 4,067 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,094 | 0.3% |
| 125th | France | 4,130 | 0.3% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,225 | 2.1% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,467 | 3.2% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,613 | 4.8% |
| 129th | Singapore | 4,635 | 1.0% |
| 130th | Netherlands | 4,695 | 0.2% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,376 | -5.3% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,663 | 0.9% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,681 | 0.6% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,826 | -1.5% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,257 | -0.4% |
| 136th | Saudi Arabia | 6,516 | 7.6% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,307 | -1.6% |
| 138th | Trinidad and Tobago | 7,576 | 7.2% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,682 | 5.7% |
| 140th | United States | 8,055 | 1.7% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,225 | 1.3% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,957 | -9.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 9,494 | 1.0% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,405 | 10.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,833 | 2.0% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,737 | 7.0% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,939 | -8.4% |
FAQ
What was Zambia's energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita in 2000 was 596. This ranked 48th globally.
How did Zambia's energy use per capita change in 2000?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita decreased by 5.3% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2000 at 16,939.
What is the energy use per capita of Zambia in 2000?▾
The energy use per capita of Zambia in 2000 was 596. This ranked 48th globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Zambia's energy use per capita?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita went from 629 in 1999 to 596 in 2000, a 5.3% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Zambia matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2000. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 22.2%. View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 2000
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Uganda
vs Tanzania
vs Guinea-Bissau
vs Nigeria
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking