Zambia - Energy Use per Capita 1998
642
−11 from 1997
Zambia's energy use per capita was 642 in 1998, decreased +11 from 652 in 1997. This was the 49th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1998▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Bangladesh | 132 | 1.2% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 161 | -0.7% |
| 3rd | Niger | 206 | -0.6% |
| 4th | Yemen, Republic of | 215 | 3.5% |
| 5th | Senegal | 225 | 3.2% |
| 6th | Congo, Republic of | 246 | -2.1% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 252 | 1.0% |
| 8th | Chad | 256 | -1.3% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 268 | 3.6% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 269 | -3.3% |
| 11th | Myanmar | 280 | 1.4% |
| 12th | Equatorial Guinea | 289 | 4.0% |
| 13th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 293 | -0.3% |
| 14th | Nepal | 307 | 0.6% |
| 15th | Eritrea | 311 | -35.8% |
| 16th | Benin | 324 | -4.4% |
| 17th | Viet Nam | 353 | 5.1% |
| 18th | Haiti | 353 | -1.3% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 354 | -3.9% |
| 20th | Tajikistan | 364 | 4.5% |
| 21st | Tanzania | 370 | 3.7% |
| 22nd | Morocco | 373 | 0.4% |
| 23rd | India | 378 | 0.6% |
| 24th | Togo | 381 | 3.9% |
| 25th | Sri Lanka | 381 | -0.2% |
| 26th | Mozambique | 383 | -0.9% |
| 27th | Ghana | 396 | 3.1% |
| 28th | Uganda | 396 | -0.9% |
| 29th | Pakistan | 399 | -0.9% |
| 30th | Albania | 427 | 11.0% |
| 31st | Cameroon | 427 | 0.2% |
| 32nd | Angola | 430 | -4.1% |
| 33rd | Kenya | 459 | 1.3% |
| 34th | Sudan | 479 | -1.4% |
| 35th | Philippines | 483 | 1.1% |
| 36th | Peru | 495 | 14.4% |
| 37th | Rwanda | 495 | -46.1% |
| 38th | Nicaragua | 496 | -0.9% |
| 39th | Honduras | 533 | 4.6% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 558 | -0.4% |
| 41st | Guatemala | 559 | 6.0% |
| 42nd | Indonesia | 568 | -4.7% |
| 43rd | Kyrgyz Republic | 579 | 4.8% |
| 44th | Armenia | 591 | 3.1% |
| 45th | Namibia | 602 | 1.2% |
| 46th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 616 | 4.4% |
| 47th | El Salvador | 622 | 2.2% |
| 48th | Costa Rica | 630 | -2.7% |
| 49th | Zambia | 642 | -1.6% |
| 50th | Tunisia | 715 | 7.6% |
| 51st | Georgia | 716 | -5.2% |
| 52nd | Ecuador | 722 | 0.9% |
| 53rd | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 737 | -7.5% |
| 54th | Mauritius | 750 | 5.3% |
| 55th | Colombia | 765 | 1.6% |
| 56th | Dominican Republic | 781 | 4.5% |
| 57th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 819 | 22.1% |
| 58th | Algeria | 828 | 1.9% |
| 59th | Zimbabwe | 856 | 0.3% |
| 60th | China | 872 | -0.5% |
| 61st | Paraguay | 880 | -3.3% |
| 62nd | Panama | 884 | 13.8% |
| 63rd | Jordan | 903 | 1.0% |
| 64th | Uruguay | 915 | 2.4% |
| 65th | Mongolia | 944 | -0.6% |
| 66th | Eswatini | 953 | 0.2% |
| 67th | Syrian Arab Republic | 977 | 8.6% |
| 68th | Cuba | 1,035 | -6.6% |
| 69th | Botswana | 1,041 | 10.4% |
| 70th | Thailand | 1,080 | -7.5% |
| 71st | Brazil | 1,082 | 0.9% |
| 72nd | Türkiye | 1,111 | 0.1% |
| 73rd | Moldova | 1,218 | -7.6% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,238 | -3.1% |
| 75th | Gabon | 1,241 | 3.7% |
| 76th | Iraq | 1,273 | -26.5% |
| 77th | Jamaica | 1,287 | 3.4% |
| 78th | North Macedonia | 1,439 | 7.0% |
| 79th | Azerbaijan | 1,485 | 2.8% |
| 80th | Mexico | 1,536 | 1.2% |
| 81st | Chile | 1,557 | 2.2% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,648 | 5.1% |
| 83rd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,725 | 0.5% |
| 84th | Uzbekistan | 1,789 | 2.5% |
| 85th | Malta | 1,793 | -12.4% |
| 86th | Latvia | 1,796 | -1.4% |
| 87th | Romania | 1,826 | -8.3% |
| 88th | Croatia | 1,861 | 0.6% |
| 89th | Malaysia | 1,903 | -7.3% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,006 | 26.3% |
| 91st | Cyprus | 2,171 | 5.1% |
| 92nd | Portugal | 2,240 | 7.5% |
| 93rd | Serbia | 2,274 | 0.0% |
| 94th | Greece | 2,393 | 4.7% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,435 | 0.7% |
| 96th | Bulgaria | 2,437 | -2.7% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,461 | -6.8% |
| 98th | Belarus | 2,473 | -1.5% |
| 99th | Hungary | 2,502 | -1.0% |
| 100th | Kazakhstan | 2,514 | 2.1% |
| 101st | Lithuania | 2,638 | 5.8% |
| 102nd | Ukraine | 2,694 | -4.7% |
| 103rd | Spain | 2,756 | 4.6% |
| 104th | Turkmenistan | 2,841 | 2.8% |
| 105th | Israel | 2,886 | 0.2% |
| 106th | Italy | 2,913 | 2.8% |
| 107th | Libya | 2,967 | 1.2% |
| 108th | Oman | 3,041 | -0.8% |
| 109th | Slovenia | 3,254 | -1.7% |
| 110th | Slovak Republic | 3,257 | -3.1% |
| 111th | Korea | 3,374 | -8.2% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,418 | 5.0% |
| 113th | European Union | 3,449 | 0.4% |
| 114th | Switzerland | 3,544 | 0.9% |
| 115th | Austria | 3,607 | 1.6% |
| 116th | Denmark | 3,773 | -2.0% |
| 117th | United Kingdom | 3,788 | 0.7% |
| 118th | Estonia | 3,791 | -6.9% |
| 119th | Japan | 3,938 | -2.1% |
| 120th | Russian Federation | 3,982 | -2.2% |
| 121st | Czechia | 4,078 | -3.1% |
| 122nd | France | 4,147 | 2.5% |
| 123rd | Germany | 4,178 | -0.6% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,205 | -2.3% |
| 125th | Gibraltar | 4,228 | 5.2% |
| 126th | Netherlands | 4,795 | 0.1% |
| 127th | Singapore | 5,083 | -12.6% |
| 128th | Australia | 5,585 | 1.6% |
| 129th | Belgium | 5,621 | 1.6% |
| 130th | Norway | 5,685 | 3.8% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,783 | 1.8% |
| 132nd | Saudi Arabia | 6,169 | 2.5% |
| 133rd | Trinidad and Tobago | 6,251 | 7.5% |
| 134th | Finland | 6,319 | 0.7% |
| 135th | Luxembourg | 7,067 | -4.6% |
| 136th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,448 | -2.7% |
| 137th | United States | 7,800 | -0.3% |
| 138th | Canada | 7,963 | -1.3% |
| 139th | Kuwait | 9,034 | 10.5% |
| 140th | Iceland | 9,292 | 5.9% |
| 141st | United Arab Emirates | 10,375 | -5.2% |
| 142nd | Bahrain | 12,558 | 1.8% |
| 143rd | Qatar | 18,391 | -0.5% |
| 144th | Curaçao | 18,843 | 16.5% |
FAQ
What was Zambia's energy use per capita in 1998?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita in 1998 was 642. This ranked 49th globally.
How did Zambia's energy use per capita change in 1998?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita decreased by 1.6% in 1998 compared to 1997.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 1998?▾
Curaçao had the highest energy use per capita in 1998 at 18,843.
What is the energy use per capita of Zambia in 1998?▾
The energy use per capita of Zambia in 1998 was 642. This ranked 49th globally.
How does 1998 compare to 1997 for Zambia's energy use per capita?▾
Zambia's energy use per capita went from 652 in 1997 to 642 in 1998, a 1.6% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Zambia matched the Currency Crisis Pattern pattern in 1998. Historically: 128 occurrences, 35 successful (27%). Outcome 24 months later: 26.0%. View full analysis →
Related
1997
1999
All years
Full ranking 1998
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 2000
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Uganda
vs Tanzania
vs Guinea-Bissau
vs Nigeria
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking