Belarus - Energy Use per Capita 2001
2,496
+24 from 2000
Belarus's energy use per capita was 2,496 in 2001, increased +24 from 2,472 in 2000. This was the 102nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2001▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | -0.6% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 139 | 13.0% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | 9.1% |
| 4th | Chad | 242 | 0.3% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 243 | 7.8% |
| 6th | Senegal | 254 | 5.5% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 254 | -0.6% |
| 8th | Yemen, Republic of | 260 | 7.6% |
| 9th | Myanmar | 274 | -3.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 276 | 0.1% |
| 11th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.1% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 283 | 3.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 283 | 3.1% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 305 | 2.8% |
| 15th | Ghana | 313 | -2.8% |
| 16th | Eritrea | 323 | 2.3% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 331 | -3.2% |
| 18th | Nepal | 336 | 1.6% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 346 | 0.9% |
| 20th | Haiti | 355 | -3.5% |
| 21st | Côte d'Ivoire | 359 | -6.4% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 386 | -0.1% |
| 23rd | Viet Nam | 393 | 5.5% |
| 24th | India | 393 | -0.4% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 397 | 0.9% |
| 26th | Togo | 399 | -2.8% |
| 27th | Morocco | 405 | 4.6% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | 0.1% |
| 29th | Mozambique | 407 | 2.8% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 408 | -0.9% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 411 | -4.8% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 420 | -1.4% |
| 33rd | Angola | 429 | 0.1% |
| 34th | Kyrgyz Republic | 436 | -7.9% |
| 35th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 445 | 4.7% |
| 36th | Kenya | 452 | -1.7% |
| 37th | Philippines | 454 | -6.8% |
| 38th | Honduras | 479 | 5.0% |
| 39th | Peru | 483 | -4.5% |
| 40th | Sudan | 494 | 1.5% |
| 41st | Nicaragua | 498 | -0.4% |
| 42nd | Zimbabwe | 540 | -2.8% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 568 | 5.8% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 591 | 0.9% |
| 45th | Zambia | 596 | 0.1% |
| 46th | Albania | 598 | 2.9% |
| 47th | Guatemala | 618 | 0.3% |
| 48th | Armenia | 625 | -0.2% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 634 | 11.3% |
| 50th | Georgia | 640 | -9.0% |
| 51st | Colombia | 656 | -1.7% |
| 52nd | Namibia | 664 | 15.2% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 669 | 4.7% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 721 | -1.2% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 757 | 0.0% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 781 | 4.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 820 | -4.3% |
| 58th | Uruguay | 832 | -12.3% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 855 | 2.7% |
| 60th | Algeria | 863 | -1.2% |
| 61st | Jordan | 876 | -3.0% |
| 62nd | Mauritius | 887 | 4.2% |
| 63rd | Panama | 887 | 12.2% |
| 64th | Eswatini | 896 | -1.9% |
| 65th | China | 922 | 2.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 929 | 0.1% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 971 | -0.8% |
| 68th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,005 | -3.8% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,045 | 21.9% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,046 | 6.1% |
| 71st | Türkiye | 1,061 | -9.0% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,061 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Brazil | 1,087 | 0.5% |
| 74th | Cuba | 1,117 | -2.6% |
| 75th | Thailand | 1,174 | 1.8% |
| 76th | Iraq | 1,184 | 8.6% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,200 | 5.5% |
| 78th | Gabon | 1,206 | 4.6% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,266 | -3.8% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,352 | 5.6% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,357 | 1.4% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,411 | 0.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,519 | -7.6% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,563 | 1.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,575 | -3.0% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,667 | 3.2% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,759 | 8.7% |
| 88th | Uzbekistan | 1,864 | -0.2% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,965 | 9.1% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,979 | 6.8% |
| 91st | Malta | 2,001 | 15.6% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,033 | 8.0% |
| 93rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,079 | -2.0% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,136 | 1.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,180 | -3.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,202 | -2.8% |
| 97th | Kazakhstan | 2,218 | -3.7% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,338 | 0.7% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,388 | 17.0% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,391 | 0.0% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | 2,420 | 6.3% |
| 102nd | Belarus | 2,496 | 1.0% |
| 103rd | Hungary | 2,513 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,584 | 2.8% |
| 105th | Turkmenistan | 2,701 | -16.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,731 | 1.1% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,973 | 2.5% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,021 | 0.3% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,049 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Libya | 3,075 | 3.3% |
| 111th | Oman | 3,304 | 0.5% |
| 112th | Slovak Republic | 3,457 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovenia | 3,484 | 6.2% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,513 | 2.5% |
| 115th | Denmark | 3,586 | 2.7% |
| 116th | Estonia | 3,589 | 6.3% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,658 | 5.5% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,714 | 2.4% |
| 119th | Austria | 3,759 | 5.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.0% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,923 | -0.7% |
| 122nd | Japan | 3,990 | -1.9% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,141 | 3.0% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,210 | 2.8% |
| 125th | France | 4,240 | 2.7% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,288 | 1.5% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,399 | -1.5% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,698 | 1.8% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,783 | 1.9% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,146 | 11.0% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,486 | -3.4% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,606 | -1.0% |
| 133rd | Sweden | 5,702 | 6.1% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,955 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,349 | -2.6% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,406 | 2.4% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,624 | -9.3% |
| 138th | United States | 7,824 | -2.9% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,986 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Canada | 8,017 | -2.5% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,337 | 10.0% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,861 | 3.9% |
| 143rd | Iceland | 10,925 | -4.2% |
| 144th | United Arab Emirates | 11,703 | 30.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,648 | -1.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,822 | 6.9% |
| 147th | Qatar | 17,812 | 5.2% |
FAQ
What was Belarus's energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita in 2001 was 2,496. This ranked 102nd globally.
How did Belarus's energy use per capita change in 2001?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita increased by 1.0% in 2001 compared to 2000.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2001 at 17,812.
What is the energy use per capita of Belarus in 2001?▾
The energy use per capita of Belarus in 2001 was 2,496. This ranked 102nd globally.
How does 2001 compare to 2000 for Belarus's energy use per capita?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita went from 2,472 in 2000 to 2,496 in 2001, a 1.0% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Belarus matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2001. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 28.4%. View full analysis →
Related
2000
2002
All years
Full ranking 2001
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1990
Lowest: 1999
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Gabon
vs Cuba
vs Peru
vs Bosnia and Herzegovina
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking