Serbia - Energy Use per Capita 2001
1,965
+164 from 2000
Serbia's energy use per capita was 1,965 in 2001, increased +164 from 1,801 in 2000. This was the 89th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2001▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | -0.6% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 139 | 13.0% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | 9.1% |
| 4th | Chad | 242 | 0.3% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 243 | 7.8% |
| 6th | Senegal | 254 | 5.5% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 254 | -0.6% |
| 8th | Yemen, Republic of | 260 | 7.6% |
| 9th | Myanmar | 274 | -3.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 276 | 0.1% |
| 11th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.1% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 283 | 3.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 283 | 3.1% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 305 | 2.8% |
| 15th | Ghana | 313 | -2.8% |
| 16th | Eritrea | 323 | 2.3% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 331 | -3.2% |
| 18th | Nepal | 336 | 1.6% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 346 | 0.9% |
| 20th | Haiti | 355 | -3.5% |
| 21st | Côte d'Ivoire | 359 | -6.4% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 386 | -0.1% |
| 23rd | Viet Nam | 393 | 5.5% |
| 24th | India | 393 | -0.4% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 397 | 0.9% |
| 26th | Togo | 399 | -2.8% |
| 27th | Morocco | 405 | 4.6% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | 0.1% |
| 29th | Mozambique | 407 | 2.8% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 408 | -0.9% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 411 | -4.8% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 420 | -1.4% |
| 33rd | Angola | 429 | 0.1% |
| 34th | Kyrgyz Republic | 436 | -7.9% |
| 35th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 445 | 4.7% |
| 36th | Kenya | 452 | -1.7% |
| 37th | Philippines | 454 | -6.8% |
| 38th | Honduras | 479 | 5.0% |
| 39th | Peru | 483 | -4.5% |
| 40th | Sudan | 494 | 1.5% |
| 41st | Nicaragua | 498 | -0.4% |
| 42nd | Zimbabwe | 540 | -2.8% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 568 | 5.8% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 591 | 0.9% |
| 45th | Zambia | 596 | 0.1% |
| 46th | Albania | 598 | 2.9% |
| 47th | Guatemala | 618 | 0.3% |
| 48th | Armenia | 625 | -0.2% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 634 | 11.3% |
| 50th | Georgia | 640 | -9.0% |
| 51st | Colombia | 656 | -1.7% |
| 52nd | Namibia | 664 | 15.2% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 669 | 4.7% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 721 | -1.2% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 757 | 0.0% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 781 | 4.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 820 | -4.3% |
| 58th | Uruguay | 832 | -12.3% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 855 | 2.7% |
| 60th | Algeria | 863 | -1.2% |
| 61st | Jordan | 876 | -3.0% |
| 62nd | Mauritius | 887 | 4.2% |
| 63rd | Panama | 887 | 12.2% |
| 64th | Eswatini | 896 | -1.9% |
| 65th | China | 922 | 2.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 929 | 0.1% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 971 | -0.8% |
| 68th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,005 | -3.8% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,045 | 21.9% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,046 | 6.1% |
| 71st | Türkiye | 1,061 | -9.0% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,061 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Brazil | 1,087 | 0.5% |
| 74th | Cuba | 1,117 | -2.6% |
| 75th | Thailand | 1,174 | 1.8% |
| 76th | Iraq | 1,184 | 8.6% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,200 | 5.5% |
| 78th | Gabon | 1,206 | 4.6% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,266 | -3.8% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,352 | 5.6% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,357 | 1.4% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,411 | 0.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,519 | -7.6% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,563 | 1.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,575 | -3.0% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,667 | 3.2% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,759 | 8.7% |
| 88th | Uzbekistan | 1,864 | -0.2% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,965 | 9.1% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,979 | 6.8% |
| 91st | Malta | 2,001 | 15.6% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,033 | 8.0% |
| 93rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,079 | -2.0% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,136 | 1.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,180 | -3.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,202 | -2.8% |
| 97th | Kazakhstan | 2,218 | -3.7% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,338 | 0.7% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,388 | 17.0% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,391 | 0.0% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | 2,420 | 6.3% |
| 102nd | Belarus | 2,496 | 1.0% |
| 103rd | Hungary | 2,513 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,584 | 2.8% |
| 105th | Turkmenistan | 2,701 | -16.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,731 | 1.1% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,973 | 2.5% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,021 | 0.3% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,049 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Libya | 3,075 | 3.3% |
| 111th | Oman | 3,304 | 0.5% |
| 112th | Slovak Republic | 3,457 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovenia | 3,484 | 6.2% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,513 | 2.5% |
| 115th | Denmark | 3,586 | 2.7% |
| 116th | Estonia | 3,589 | 6.3% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,658 | 5.5% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,714 | 2.4% |
| 119th | Austria | 3,759 | 5.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.0% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,923 | -0.7% |
| 122nd | Japan | 3,990 | -1.9% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,141 | 3.0% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,210 | 2.8% |
| 125th | France | 4,240 | 2.7% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,288 | 1.5% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,399 | -1.5% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,698 | 1.8% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,783 | 1.9% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,146 | 11.0% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,486 | -3.4% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,606 | -1.0% |
| 133rd | Sweden | 5,702 | 6.1% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,955 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,349 | -2.6% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,406 | 2.4% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,624 | -9.3% |
| 138th | United States | 7,824 | -2.9% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,986 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Canada | 8,017 | -2.5% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,337 | 10.0% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,861 | 3.9% |
| 143rd | Iceland | 10,925 | -4.2% |
| 144th | United Arab Emirates | 11,703 | 30.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,648 | -1.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,822 | 6.9% |
| 147th | Qatar | 17,812 | 5.2% |
FAQ
What was Serbia's energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita in 2001 was 1,965. This ranked 89th globally.
How did Serbia's energy use per capita change in 2001?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita increased by 9.1% in 2001 compared to 2000.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2001 at 17,812.
What is the energy use per capita of Serbia in 2001?▾
The energy use per capita of Serbia in 2001 was 1,965. This ranked 89th globally.
How does 2001 compare to 2000 for Serbia's energy use per capita?▾
Serbia's energy use per capita went from 1,801 in 2000 to 1,965 in 2001, a 9.1% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Serbia matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2001. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 9.9%. View full analysis →
Related
2000
2002
All years
Full ranking 2001
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2025
Lowest: 1994
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Montenegro
vs Kazakhstan
vs St. Lucia
vs Argentina
Global Ranking