Hong Kong SAR, China - Energy Use per Capita 2001
2,079
−43 from 2000
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita was 2,079 in 2001, decreased +43 from 2,121 in 2000. This was the 93rd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2001▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 127 | -0.6% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 139 | 13.0% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 148 | 9.1% |
| 4th | Chad | 242 | 0.3% |
| 5th | Congo, Republic of | 243 | 7.8% |
| 6th | Senegal | 254 | 5.5% |
| 7th | Madagascar | 254 | -0.6% |
| 8th | Yemen, Republic of | 260 | 7.6% |
| 9th | Myanmar | 274 | -3.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 276 | 0.1% |
| 11th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.1% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 283 | 3.3% |
| 13th | Benin | 283 | 3.1% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 305 | 2.8% |
| 15th | Ghana | 313 | -2.8% |
| 16th | Eritrea | 323 | 2.3% |
| 17th | Tajikistan | 331 | -3.2% |
| 18th | Nepal | 336 | 1.6% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 346 | 0.9% |
| 20th | Haiti | 355 | -3.5% |
| 21st | Côte d'Ivoire | 359 | -6.4% |
| 22nd | Uganda | 386 | -0.1% |
| 23rd | Viet Nam | 393 | 5.5% |
| 24th | India | 393 | -0.4% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 397 | 0.9% |
| 26th | Togo | 399 | -2.8% |
| 27th | Morocco | 405 | 4.6% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | 0.1% |
| 29th | Mozambique | 407 | 2.8% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 408 | -0.9% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 411 | -4.8% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 420 | -1.4% |
| 33rd | Angola | 429 | 0.1% |
| 34th | Kyrgyz Republic | 436 | -7.9% |
| 35th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 445 | 4.7% |
| 36th | Kenya | 452 | -1.7% |
| 37th | Philippines | 454 | -6.8% |
| 38th | Honduras | 479 | 5.0% |
| 39th | Peru | 483 | -4.5% |
| 40th | Sudan | 494 | 1.5% |
| 41st | Nicaragua | 498 | -0.4% |
| 42nd | Zimbabwe | 540 | -2.8% |
| 43rd | El Salvador | 568 | 5.8% |
| 44th | Indonesia | 591 | 0.9% |
| 45th | Zambia | 596 | 0.1% |
| 46th | Albania | 598 | 2.9% |
| 47th | Guatemala | 618 | 0.3% |
| 48th | Armenia | 625 | -0.2% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 634 | 11.3% |
| 50th | Georgia | 640 | -9.0% |
| 51st | Colombia | 656 | -1.7% |
| 52nd | Namibia | 664 | 15.2% |
| 53rd | Ecuador | 669 | 4.7% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 721 | -1.2% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 757 | 0.0% |
| 56th | Tunisia | 781 | 4.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 820 | -4.3% |
| 58th | Uruguay | 832 | -12.3% |
| 59th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 855 | 2.7% |
| 60th | Algeria | 863 | -1.2% |
| 61st | Jordan | 876 | -3.0% |
| 62nd | Mauritius | 887 | 4.2% |
| 63rd | Panama | 887 | 12.2% |
| 64th | Eswatini | 896 | -1.9% |
| 65th | China | 922 | 2.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 929 | 0.1% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 971 | -0.8% |
| 68th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,005 | -3.8% |
| 69th | Kosovo | 1,045 | 21.9% |
| 70th | Moldova | 1,046 | 6.1% |
| 71st | Türkiye | 1,061 | -9.0% |
| 72nd | Botswana | 1,061 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Brazil | 1,087 | 0.5% |
| 74th | Cuba | 1,117 | -2.6% |
| 75th | Thailand | 1,174 | 1.8% |
| 76th | Iraq | 1,184 | 8.6% |
| 77th | Lebanon | 1,200 | 5.5% |
| 78th | Gabon | 1,206 | 4.6% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,266 | -3.8% |
| 80th | Suriname | 1,352 | 5.6% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,357 | 1.4% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,411 | 0.5% |
| 83rd | Argentina | 1,519 | -7.6% |
| 84th | Mexico | 1,563 | 1.4% |
| 85th | Chile | 1,575 | -3.0% |
| 86th | Romania | 1,667 | 3.2% |
| 87th | Latvia | 1,759 | 8.7% |
| 88th | Uzbekistan | 1,864 | -0.2% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,965 | 9.1% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,979 | 6.8% |
| 91st | Malta | 2,001 | 15.6% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 2,033 | 8.0% |
| 93rd | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,079 | -2.0% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,136 | 1.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,180 | -3.9% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,202 | -2.8% |
| 97th | Kazakhstan | 2,218 | -3.7% |
| 98th | Poland | 2,338 | 0.7% |
| 99th | Lithuania | 2,388 | 17.0% |
| 100th | Portugal | 2,391 | 0.0% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | 2,420 | 6.3% |
| 102nd | Belarus | 2,496 | 1.0% |
| 103rd | Hungary | 2,513 | 2.6% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,584 | 2.8% |
| 105th | Turkmenistan | 2,701 | -16.8% |
| 106th | Ukraine | 2,731 | 1.1% |
| 107th | Israel | 2,973 | 2.5% |
| 108th | Italy | 3,021 | 0.3% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,049 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Libya | 3,075 | 3.3% |
| 111th | Oman | 3,304 | 0.5% |
| 112th | Slovak Republic | 3,457 | 5.0% |
| 113th | Slovenia | 3,484 | 6.2% |
| 114th | European Union | 3,513 | 2.5% |
| 115th | Denmark | 3,586 | 2.7% |
| 116th | Estonia | 3,589 | 6.3% |
| 117th | Switzerland | 3,658 | 5.5% |
| 118th | Ireland | 3,714 | 2.4% |
| 119th | Austria | 3,759 | 5.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.0% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,923 | -0.7% |
| 122nd | Japan | 3,990 | -1.9% |
| 123rd | Czechia | 4,141 | 3.0% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,210 | 2.8% |
| 125th | France | 4,240 | 2.7% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,288 | 1.5% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,399 | -1.5% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,698 | 1.8% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,783 | 1.9% |
| 130th | Singapore | 5,146 | 11.0% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,486 | -3.4% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,606 | -1.0% |
| 133rd | Sweden | 5,702 | 6.1% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,955 | 2.2% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,349 | -2.6% |
| 136th | Finland | 6,406 | 2.4% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 6,624 | -9.3% |
| 138th | United States | 7,824 | -2.9% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,986 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Canada | 8,017 | -2.5% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 8,337 | 10.0% |
| 142nd | Kuwait | 9,861 | 3.9% |
| 143rd | Iceland | 10,925 | -4.2% |
| 144th | United Arab Emirates | 11,703 | 30.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,648 | -1.4% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 16,822 | 6.9% |
| 147th | Qatar | 17,812 | 5.2% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2001 was 2,079. This ranked 93rd globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita change in 2001?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita decreased by 2.0% in 2001 compared to 2000.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2001?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2001 at 17,812.
What is the energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2001?▾
The energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2001 was 2,079. This ranked 93rd globally.
How does 2001 compare to 2000 for Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita went from 2,121 in 2000 to 2,079 in 2001, a 2.0% decrease.
Related
2000
2002
All years
Full ranking 2001
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1999
Lowest: 2025
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking