Eswatini - FDI Outflows 2000
1.01%
+0.15% from 1999
Eswatini's fdi outflows was 1.01% in 2000, increased +0.15% from 0.86% in 1999. This was the 101st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Congo, Republic of | -8.07% | 67.6% |
| 2nd | New Zealand | -7.87% | -530.6% |
| 3rd | Guatemala | -5.28% | -225.6% |
| 4th | Eritrea | -3.95% | 67.3% |
| 5th | St. Lucia | -2.64% | - |
| 6th | Solomon Islands | -2.61% | - |
| 7th | Benin | -1.96% | -153.1% |
| 8th | Burundi | -1.34% | -4,444.4% |
| 9th | Kuwait | -0.80% | -1,152.9% |
| 10th | Philippines | -0.75% | -189.9% |
| 11th | Cambodia | -0.64% | 81.4% |
| 12th | Mali | -0.52% | -171.7% |
| 13th | Honduras | -0.35% | -343.9% |
| 14th | Yemen, Republic of | -0.09% | -69.1% |
| 15th | Dominica | -0.06% | - |
| 16th | El Salvador | -0.04% | -108.9% |
| 17th | Romania | -0.03% | -166.3% |
| 18th | Malawi | -0.02% | -711.2% |
| 19th | Uruguay | -0.02% | -74.6% |
| 20th | Madagascar | -0.02% | 44.0% |
| 21st | Thailand | -0.02% | -106.7% |
| 22nd | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -0.01% | 58.3% |
| 23rd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 0.00% | - |
| 24th | Kenya | 0.00% | -100.0% |
| 25th | Belarus | 0.00% | -76.2% |
| 26th | Ukraine | 0.00% | -86.1% |
| 27th | Bangladesh | 0.00% | 3,104.4% |
| 28th | Poland | 0.00% | -95.3% |
| 29th | Burkina Faso | 0.01% | -1.3% |
| 30th | Moldova | 0.01% | 81.7% |
| 31st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 0.01% | -94.1% |
| 32nd | Pakistan | 0.01% | -66.8% |
| 33rd | Sri Lanka | 0.01% | -92.1% |
| 34th | Azerbaijan | 0.01% | 3,104.5% |
| 35th | Grenada | 0.01% | - |
| 36th | Papua New Guinea | 0.02% | -63.6% |
| 37th | Serbia | 0.02% | 20,400,041.1% |
| 38th | Bulgaria | 0.02% | -80.2% |
| 39th | Algeria | 0.03% | 60.0% |
| 40th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 0.03% | -1.3% |
| 41st | Botswana | 0.04% | 41.0% |
| 42nd | Lithuania | 0.04% | -94.4% |
| 43rd | Côte d'Ivoire | 0.05% | 41.1% |
| 44th | North Macedonia | 0.05% | -41.3% |
| 45th | New Caledonia | 0.05% | - |
| 46th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 0.05% | 23.6% |
| 47th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.07% | - |
| 48th | Czechia | 0.07% | -50.0% |
| 49th | Latvia | 0.09% | -62.7% |
| 50th | Cameroon | 0.10% | -71.2% |
| 51st | Qatar | 0.10% | 72.0% |
| 52nd | Jordan | 0.10% | 83.6% |
| 53rd | Bahrain | 0.11% | -95.1% |
| 54th | French Polynesia | 0.11% | 555.0% |
| 55th | India | 0.11% | 528.9% |
| 56th | Georgia | 0.11% | 211.3% |
| 57th | Paraguay | 0.11% | 1,875.8% |
| 58th | Zimbabwe | 0.11% | -14.6% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 0.13% | 1,053.7% |
| 60th | Morocco | 0.14% | 1,502.4% |
| 61st | Fiji | 0.14% | 104.4% |
| 62nd | Aruba | 0.14% | 235.1% |
| 63rd | Dominican Republic | 0.15% | 363.1% |
| 64th | Kiribati | 0.15% | 23.7% |
| 65th | South Africa | 0.18% | -82.5% |
| 66th | Croatia | 0.22% | -17.1% |
| 67th | Nigeria | 0.24% | -16.4% |
| 68th | Libya | 0.26% | -59.2% |
| 69th | Cabo Verde | 0.26% | 268.6% |
| 70th | Mauritius | 0.27% | 87.6% |
| 71st | Guyana | 0.28% | 197.5% |
| 72nd | Jamaica | 0.28% | -45.0% |
| 73rd | Niger | 0.30% | 594.3% |
| 74th | Namibia | 0.31% | -61.4% |
| 75th | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.31% | -92.0% |
| 76th | Türkiye | 0.32% | 26.0% |
| 77th | Argentina | 0.32% | -48.1% |
| 78th | Senegal | 0.32% | 8.3% |
| 79th | Slovenia | 0.32% | 53.5% |
| 80th | Colombia | 0.33% | 143.0% |
| 81st | Kyrgyz Republic | 0.33% | -32.3% |
| 82nd | China | 0.38% | 3.1% |
| 83rd | Brazil | 0.38% | 52.5% |
| 84th | Bermuda | 0.40% | -53.7% |
| 85th | United Arab Emirates | 0.41% | 8.1% |
| 86th | Kazakhstan | 0.50% | 2,266.2% |
| 87th | Slovak Republic | 0.52% | 140.6% |
| 88th | Togo | 0.53% | 148.3% |
| 89th | Belize | 0.55% | 7.4% |
| 90th | Italy | 0.56% | 2,600.2% |
| 91st | Lao PDR | 0.57% | 1,394.6% |
| 92nd | Costa Rica | 0.72% | 1,937.8% |
| 93rd | Barbados | 0.75% | 1,594.5% |
| 94th | Lebanon | 0.80% | 5.5% |
| 95th | Greece | 0.80% | 1,803.2% |
| 96th | Korea | 0.81% | 5.3% |
| 97th | Saudi Arabia | 0.82% | 1,095.0% |
| 98th | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.86% | - |
| 99th | Japan | 0.91% | 73.2% |
| 100th | Australia | 0.98% | 1,131.4% |
| 101st | Eswatini | 1.01% | 17.6% |
| 102nd | Russian Federation | 1.22% | 9.2% |
| 103rd | Hungary | 1.28% | 27.4% |
| 104th | Seychelles | 1.61% | 18.4% |
| 105th | Estonia | 1.62% | -9.8% |
| 106th | Panama | 1.70% | -31.0% |
| 107th | Cyprus | 1.72% | -0.9% |
| 108th | Bahamas, The | 1.74% | 66,560.1% |
| 109th | United States | 1.82% | -29.2% |
| 110th | Malaysia | 2.16% | 20.2% |
| 111th | Israel | 2.44% | 257.8% |
| 112th | Austria | 2.81% | 84.1% |
| 113th | Malta | 4.04% | 226.5% |
| 114th | Iceland | 4.10% | 200.2% |
| 115th | Ireland | 4.62% | -25.2% |
| 116th | Germany | 4.99% | -20.7% |
| 117th | West Bank and Gaza | 5.06% | 26.7% |
| 118th | Chile | 5.09% | 50.4% |
| 119th | Tonga | 5.27% | 194.8% |
| 120th | Canada | 6.26% | 113.2% |
| 121st | Norway | 6.30% | 110.8% |
| 122nd | Gabon | 6.81% | -0.7% |
| 123rd | Singapore | 7.13% | -26.0% |
| 124th | Portugal | 7.40% | 256.5% |
| 125th | European Union | 8.49% | 21.1% |
| 126th | Spain | 9.95% | 39.0% |
| 127th | France | 12.76% | 51.2% |
| 128th | Sweden | 15.30% | 72.2% |
| 129th | Switzerland | 16.94% | 42.7% |
| 130th | Denmark | 17.30% | 72.7% |
| 131st | United Kingdom | 17.47% | 22.1% |
| 132nd | Netherlands | 17.84% | 39.8% |
| 133rd | Finland | 22.45% | 207.1% |
| 134th | Belgium | 36.47% | -23.0% |
| 135th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 40.77% | 204.3% |
| 136th | Liberia | 89.23% | 26.9% |
FAQ
What was Eswatini's fdi outflows in 2000?▾
Eswatini's fdi outflows in 2000 was 1.01%. This ranked 101st globally.
How did Eswatini's fdi outflows change in 2000?▾
Eswatini's fdi outflows increased by 17.6% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest fdi outflows in 2000?▾
Liberia had the highest fdi outflows in 2000 at 89.23%.
What is the fdi outflows of Eswatini in 2000?▾
The fdi outflows of Eswatini in 2000 was 1.01%. This ranked 101st globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Eswatini's fdi outflows?▾
Eswatini's fdi outflows went from 0.86% in 1999 to 1.01% in 2000, a 17.6% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Eswatini matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2000. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 12.0%. View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
Exports
Imports
Trade Balance
Current Account Balance
FDI Inflows
Peak: 1994
Lowest: 2001
FDI Outflows 1990s
FDI Outflows 2000s
FDI Outflows 2010s
FDI Outflows 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Djibouti
vs Philippines
vs Sri Lanka
vs Bhutan
African Union FDI Outflows
Global Ranking