Eswatini - Regulatory Quality 2000
-0.19
−0.01 from 1999
Eswatini's regulatory quality was -0.19 in 2000. This was the 104th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Singapore | 2.07 | -4.0% |
| 2nd | Netherlands | 2.03 | 8.7% |
| 3rd | Luxembourg | 1.85 | 24.0% |
| 4th | United Kingdom | 1.81 | -8.6% |
| 5th | Switzerland | 1.79 | 9.2% |
| 6th | Finland | 1.78 | 1.2% |
| 7th | Ireland | 1.78 | 8.8% |
| 8th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1.76 | -4.1% |
| 9th | Denmark | 1.71 | -0.1% |
| 10th | United States | 1.70 | 5.3% |
| 11th | New Zealand | 1.67 | -14.5% |
| 12th | Australia | 1.58 | 10.0% |
| 13th | Iceland | 1.55 | 19.4% |
| 14th | Austria | 1.48 | 9.6% |
| 15th | Canada | 1.46 | -4.7% |
| 16th | Bermuda | 1.46 | -1.6% |
| 17th | Liechtenstein | 1.46 | -1.6% |
| 18th | Germany | 1.46 | 18.3% |
| 19th | Chile | 1.40 | 2.1% |
| 20th | Sweden | 1.35 | 15.9% |
| 21st | Estonia | 1.27 | 6.3% |
| 22nd | Barbados | 1.26 | -2.3% |
| 23rd | Spain | 1.24 | 3.5% |
| 24th | Andorra | 1.22 | -1.8% |
| 25th | Cayman Islands | 1.22 | 21.2% |
| 26th | Puerto Rico (US) | 1.22 | -1.8% |
| 27th | Belgium | 1.15 | 14.6% |
| 28th | Bahamas, The | 1.14 | 12.9% |
| 29th | Norway | 1.11 | -21.3% |
| 30th | Malta | 1.10 | 8.7% |
| 31st | Cyprus | 1.09 | -5.8% |
| 32nd | Israel | 1.08 | 3.0% |
| 33rd | Hungary | 1.04 | 8.5% |
| 34th | Dominica | 0.99 | -2.2% |
| 35th | Maldives | 0.99 | -2.2% |
| 36th | Brunei Darussalam | 0.94 | 5.6% |
| 37th | Portugal | 0.92 | -15.4% |
| 38th | France | 0.91 | 10.8% |
| 39th | Japan | 0.80 | 43.8% |
| 40th | Botswana | 0.80 | -4.3% |
| 41st | Italy | 0.79 | 11.4% |
| 42nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.75 | -2.8% |
| 43rd | Bahrain | 0.75 | -2.0% |
| 44th | Uruguay | 0.75 | -17.7% |
| 45th | Czechia | 0.74 | -18.9% |
| 46th | Greece | 0.74 | 27.5% |
| 47th | Lithuania | 0.71 | -22.0% |
| 48th | Poland | 0.70 | 14.2% |
| 49th | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.70 | -1.0% |
| 50th | Costa Rica | 0.70 | -24.4% |
| 51st | Latvia | 0.70 | -17.0% |
| 52nd | United Arab Emirates | 0.69 | 18.1% |
| 53rd | Slovenia | 0.67 | -35.9% |
| 54th | Panama | 0.61 | -26.3% |
| 55th | Slovak Republic | 0.58 | 16.4% |
| 56th | Korea | 0.57 | 78.2% |
| 57th | South Africa | 0.54 | 6.5% |
| 58th | Malaysia | 0.53 | -24.7% |
| 59th | Grenada | 0.52 | -4.0% |
| 60th | Macao SAR, China | 0.52 | -4.0% |
| 61st | Thailand | 0.48 | 323.4% |
| 62nd | Mauritius | 0.37 | 193.0% |
| 63rd | Peru | 0.33 | -42.0% |
| 64th | Namibia | 0.32 | -31.3% |
| 65th | Seychelles | 0.28 | -7.1% |
| 66th | Jordan | 0.27 | -19.0% |
| 67th | Brazil | 0.26 | -21.0% |
| 68th | Türkiye | 0.25 | -32.4% |
| 69th | Mexico | 0.22 | 46.8% |
| 70th | Belize | 0.21 | 6.0% |
| 71st | Bulgaria | 0.20 | 5.8% |
| 72nd | Jamaica | 0.20 | -9.6% |
| 73rd | Argentina | 0.18 | -65.0% |
| 74th | Sri Lanka | 0.16 | 2.2% |
| 75th | Colombia | 0.09 | 154.4% |
| 76th | Gabon | 0.07 | -79.4% |
| 77th | Tunisia | 0.07 | -49.4% |
| 78th | Oman | 0.06 | 206.3% |
| 79th | Philippines | 0.02 | -89.8% |
| 80th | Samoa | 0.02 | -44.6% |
| 81st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 0.02 | -90.5% |
| 82nd | Ghana | 0.00 | 99.2% |
| 83rd | Cabo Verde | -0.02 | 96.4% |
| 84th | El Salvador | -0.02 | -122.2% |
| 85th | Qatar | -0.02 | -143.5% |
| 86th | Morocco | -0.02 | -188.4% |
| 87th | Kuwait | -0.05 | 15.9% |
| 88th | Romania | -0.10 | -149.6% |
| 89th | Croatia | -0.12 | 18.4% |
| 90th | Saudi Arabia | -0.12 | 57.1% |
| 91st | Dominican Republic | -0.12 | -69.0% |
| 92nd | Guyana | -0.13 | -133.7% |
| 93rd | Moldova | -0.14 | -28.3% |
| 94th | Mozambique | -0.15 | 53.6% |
| 95th | Malawi | -0.16 | -36.8% |
| 96th | Burkina Faso | -0.16 | 31.8% |
| 97th | Cambodia | -0.16 | 2.8% |
| 98th | India | -0.16 | 64.0% |
| 99th | Benin | -0.16 | -10.8% |
| 100th | Lesotho | -0.16 | 46.2% |
| 101st | Armenia | -0.17 | 31.8% |
| 102nd | Mongolia | -0.17 | -7.4% |
| 103rd | Uganda | -0.17 | -242.2% |
| 104th | Eswatini | -0.19 | -5.9% |
| 105th | Senegal | -0.19 | -16.2% |
| 106th | Kyrgyz Republic | -0.23 | -24.2% |
| 107th | North Macedonia | -0.26 | 29.2% |
| 108th | Indonesia | -0.26 | 26.2% |
| 109th | Guatemala | -0.29 | -86.5% |
| 110th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | -0.30 | -76.5% |
| 111th | Fiji | -0.32 | -855.5% |
| 112th | Mauritania | -0.32 | 30.0% |
| 113th | China | -0.32 | -21.4% |
| 114th | Mali | -0.33 | -5.2% |
| 115th | Papua New Guinea | -0.33 | 16.6% |
| 116th | Nicaragua | -0.34 | -43.6% |
| 117th | Kenya | -0.39 | -53.6% |
| 118th | Ukraine | -0.41 | 42.7% |
| 119th | Albania | -0.42 | 5.8% |
| 120th | Tanzania | -0.42 | -6.2% |
| 121st | Bhutan | -0.43 | -4.9% |
| 122nd | Gambia, The | -0.43 | 37.2% |
| 123rd | Zambia | -0.45 | -52.5% |
| 124th | Ecuador | -0.45 | -598.2% |
| 125th | Lebanon | -0.49 | 2.5% |
| 126th | Georgia | -0.52 | 26.4% |
| 127th | Madagascar | -0.52 | 34.7% |
| 128th | Russian Federation | -0.52 | -2.9% |
| 129th | Côte d'Ivoire | -0.55 | -93.8% |
| 130th | Honduras | -0.57 | -41.3% |
| 131st | Suriname | -0.58 | -9.0% |
| 132nd | Kazakhstan | -0.61 | -49.2% |
| 133rd | Viet Nam | -0.64 | -5.1% |
| 134th | Nepal | -0.66 | -45.1% |
| 135th | São Tomé and Principe | -0.66 | -3.1% |
| 136th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.68 | 33.7% |
| 137th | Yemen, Republic of | -0.71 | -18.0% |
| 138th | Algeria | -0.71 | 19.4% |
| 139th | Djibouti | -0.71 | 20.2% |
| 140th | Paraguay | -0.72 | -32.8% |
| 141st | Pakistan | -0.77 | -18.3% |
| 142nd | Niger | -0.77 | -3.6% |
| 143rd | Cameroon | -0.82 | 9.5% |
| 144th | Guinea | -0.82 | -2.2% |
| 145th | Togo | -0.83 | -23.0% |
| 146th | Serbia | -0.86 | -4.3% |
| 147th | Azerbaijan | -0.86 | 17.9% |
| 148th | Nigeria | -0.88 | 5.1% |
| 149th | Central African Republic | -0.90 | -2.2% |
| 150th | West Bank and Gaza | -0.90 | -2.2% |
| 151st | Bangladesh | -0.94 | 10.3% |
| 152nd | Haiti | -0.94 | 1.3% |
| 153rd | Guinea-Bissau | -1.05 | 14.2% |
| 154th | Burundi | -1.14 | 27.9% |
| 155th | Comoros | -1.14 | -1.7% |
| 156th | Eritrea | -1.14 | -1.7% |
| 157th | Tajikistan | -1.16 | 20.7% |
| 158th | Congo, Republic of | -1.20 | 7.7% |
| 159th | Chad | -1.21 | -0.6% |
| 160th | Cuba | -1.22 | 7.0% |
| 161st | Syrian Arab Republic | -1.26 | -0.8% |
| 162nd | Lao PDR | -1.34 | -17.8% |
| 163rd | Rwanda | -1.36 | -0.7% |
| 164th | Sudan | -1.39 | -6.7% |
| 165th | Zimbabwe | -1.39 | -65.1% |
| 166th | Belarus | -1.50 | -0.1% |
| 167th | Angola | -1.51 | -4.3% |
| 168th | Sierra Leone | -1.57 | -5.2% |
| 169th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | -1.64 | -0.9% |
| 170th | Equatorial Guinea | -1.65 | -1.0% |
| 171st | Liberia | -1.73 | 0.9% |
| 172nd | Libya | -1.77 | 6.6% |
| 173rd | Turkmenistan | -1.77 | -1.2% |
| 174th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -1.84 | 12.1% |
| 175th | Myanmar | -2.02 | -13.5% |
| 176th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | -2.06 | 5.4% |
| 177th | Afghanistan | -2.08 | -0.8% |
| 178th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | -2.15 | -0.9% |
| 179th | Iraq | -2.17 | 1.6% |
| 180th | Uzbekistan | -2.24 | -11.0% |
FAQ
What was Eswatini's regulatory quality in 2000?▾
Eswatini's regulatory quality in 2000 was -0.19. This ranked 104th globally.
How did Eswatini's regulatory quality change in 2000?▾
Eswatini's regulatory quality decreased by 5.9% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest regulatory quality in 2000?▾
Singapore had the highest regulatory quality in 2000 at 2.07.
What is the regulatory quality of Eswatini in 2000?▾
The regulatory quality of Eswatini in 2000 was -0.19. This ranked 104th globally.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Eswatini matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2000. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 12.0%. View full analysis →
Related
All years
Full ranking 2000
Political Stability
Government Effectiveness
Rule of Law
Control of Corruption
Voice and Accountability
Peak: 2013
Lowest: 2025
Regulatory Quality 1990s
Regulatory Quality 2000s
Regulatory Quality 2010s
Regulatory Quality 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Djibouti
vs Philippines
vs Sri Lanka
vs Bhutan
African Union Regulatory Quality
Global Ranking