Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2009
102.23
+20.70 from 2008
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 102.23 in 2009, increased +20.70 from 101.57 in 2008. This was the 61st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2009▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Thailand | 86.59 | -3.6% |
| 2nd | South Africa | 87.49 | -22.9% |
| 3rd | Australia | 87.59 | -18.4% |
| 4th | India | 88.43 | -5.6% |
| 5th | Brazil | 89.17 | -39.0% |
| 6th | Uruguay | 90.09 | 2.1% |
| 7th | Costa Rica | 90.28 | 1.3% |
| 8th | Colombia | 90.45 | -28.7% |
| 9th | New Zealand | 91.34 | -7.6% |
| 10th | Canada | 91.57 | -23.1% |
| 11th | Korea | 91.61 | -6.8% |
| 12th | Russian Federation | 92.14 | -28.9% |
| 13th | Peru | 92.61 | 3.2% |
| 14th | Nigeria | 92.65 | -6.9% |
| 15th | Mexico | 92.78 | -32.0% |
| 16th | Ghana | 94.77 | -9.2% |
| 17th | Sweden | 94.80 | -20.2% |
| 18th | Trinidad and Tobago | 94.83 | 9.3% |
| 19th | Poland | 94.85 | -22.5% |
| 20th | Malaysia | 94.94 | -17.2% |
| 21st | Chile | 95.14 | -17.5% |
| 22nd | Serbia | 95.17 | -5.6% |
| 23rd | Lesotho | 95.49 | -18.7% |
| 24th | Estonia | 95.59 | 1.4% |
| 25th | Zambia | 95.62 | -15.1% |
| 26th | Israel | 95.82 | 10.5% |
| 27th | Philippines | 96.01 | 11.8% |
| 28th | Switzerland | 96.09 | 12.6% |
| 29th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 96.26 | 4.0% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 96.49 | -0.9% |
| 31st | Norway | 96.55 | -23.2% |
| 32nd | Iceland | 96.68 | 0.4% |
| 33rd | Burundi | 96.82 | 8.8% |
| 34th | Singapore | 97.03 | 5.8% |
| 35th | Lithuania | 97.80 | 7.0% |
| 36th | Indonesia | 97.87 | -0.4% |
| 37th | Ukraine | 97.90 | -16.6% |
| 38th | United Arab Emirates | 97.93 | 5.9% |
| 39th | Romania | 98.65 | -9.1% |
| 40th | Hungary | 98.98 | -20.0% |
| 41st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 98.99 | 13.3% |
| 42nd | Paraguay | 99.17 | -8.4% |
| 43rd | Armenia | 99.24 | -8.0% |
| 44th | Czechia | 99.33 | -5.2% |
| 45th | Japan | 99.54 | -12.6% |
| 46th | Dominican Republic | 99.58 | -0.2% |
| 47th | Antigua and Barbuda | 99.84 | 4.7% |
| 48th | St. Lucia | 99.90 | 2.6% |
| 49th | Samoa | 100.01 | 7.8% |
| 50th | Guyana | 100.11 | 6.0% |
| 51st | Algeria | 100.26 | -10.0% |
| 52nd | United Kingdom | 100.31 | -9.3% |
| 53rd | Equatorial Guinea | 100.53 | 3.8% |
| 54th | Grenada | 100.63 | 1.7% |
| 55th | Saudi Arabia | 100.71 | 28.6% |
| 56th | Greece | 100.77 | -10.6% |
| 57th | Bahamas, The | 101.09 | 2.7% |
| 58th | China | 101.11 | 30.8% |
| 59th | Dominica | 101.30 | 1.2% |
| 60th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 101.71 | 4.3% |
| 61st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 102.23 | 25.4% |
| 62nd | Bahrain | 102.44 | 4.7% |
| 63rd | Tunisia | 102.52 | -0.8% |
| 64th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 102.52 | 3.4% |
| 65th | Papua New Guinea | 102.60 | 7.6% |
| 66th | Belize | 102.60 | 2.8% |
| 67th | Luxembourg | 102.63 | 2.3% |
| 68th | Gambia, The | 102.80 | -9.6% |
| 69th | Croatia | 102.94 | -5.0% |
| 70th | Portugal | 103.04 | -2.1% |
| 71st | Austria | 103.59 | 5.1% |
| 72nd | Sierra Leone | 103.67 | 2.2% |
| 73rd | North Macedonia | 103.71 | 0.9% |
| 74th | Spain | 103.78 | -3.0% |
| 75th | Bulgaria | 103.88 | 11.5% |
| 76th | Belgium | 104.21 | 3.0% |
| 77th | Denmark | 104.46 | 1.8% |
| 78th | France | 104.54 | -4.8% |
| 79th | Georgia | 104.57 | -2.9% |
| 80th | Cyprus | 104.68 | -7.3% |
| 81st | United States | 104.70 | 23.7% |
| 82nd | Slovenia | 104.70 | 1.5% |
| 83rd | Slovak Republic | 104.78 | 9.6% |
| 84th | Morocco | 104.82 | 3.0% |
| 85th | Fiji | 104.88 | -12.4% |
| 86th | Italy | 105.07 | -3.1% |
| 87th | Netherlands | 105.12 | 2.2% |
| 88th | Togo | 105.35 | 0.8% |
| 89th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 105.95 | 9.0% |
| 90th | Malta | 106.30 | -0.7% |
| 91st | Germany | 106.46 | -1.8% |
| 92nd | Cameroon | 106.47 | 1.4% |
| 93rd | Gabon | 106.55 | 0.7% |
| 94th | Central African Republic | 106.63 | 2.1% |
| 95th | Moldova | 106.69 | 2.5% |
| 96th | Finland | 106.70 | 0.2% |
| 97th | Nicaragua | 106.95 | 9.3% |
| 98th | Malawi | 107.20 | 9.5% |
| 99th | Côte d'Ivoire | 107.36 | 0.3% |
| 100th | Ireland | 107.73 | -15.4% |
| 101st | Solomon Islands | 107.87 | 7.3% |
| 102nd | Latvia | 108.01 | 10.6% |
| 103rd | Uganda | 108.35 | -2.6% |
| 104th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 112.64 | 0.7% |
| 105th | Türkiye | 163.11 | -6.4% |
| 106th | Argentina | 186.85 | -6.4% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2009?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2009 was 102.23. This ranked 61st globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2009?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 25.4% in 2009 compared to 2008.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2009?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2009 at 186.85.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2009?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2009 was 102.23. This ranked 61st globally.
How does 2009 compare to 2008 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 101.57 in 2008 to 102.23 in 2009, a 25.4% increase.
Related
2008
2010
All years
Full ranking 2009
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking