Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1998
153.40
+37.93 from 1997
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 153.40 in 1998, increased +37.93 from 135.65 in 1997. This was the 100th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1998▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Slovak Republic | 53.69 | 2.8% |
| 2nd | Indonesia | 55.23 | -50.6% |
| 3rd | Zambia | 58.12 | -6.5% |
| 4th | Bulgaria | 65.40 | 22.7% |
| 5th | Equatorial Guinea | 66.84 | 6.4% |
| 6th | Czechia | 67.17 | 10.9% |
| 7th | Trinidad and Tobago | 69.90 | 3.9% |
| 8th | Lithuania | 70.10 | 7.3% |
| 9th | Russian Federation | 70.16 | -36.4% |
| 10th | Hungary | 70.95 | -13.6% |
| 11th | Australia | 73.26 | -22.4% |
| 12th | Estonia | 73.99 | 9.8% |
| 13th | Armenia | 74.06 | 6.0% |
| 14th | Canada | 76.19 | -23.6% |
| 15th | Latvia | 80.15 | 7.5% |
| 16th | Thailand | 80.82 | -14.8% |
| 17th | United Arab Emirates | 81.44 | 9.3% |
| 18th | Moldova | 82.36 | -2.9% |
| 19th | Samoa | 83.23 | -0.5% |
| 20th | Romania | 84.66 | 31.6% |
| 21st | Poland | 86.09 | -0.8% |
| 22nd | India | 88.23 | -3.0% |
| 23rd | New Zealand | 88.64 | -12.7% |
| 24th | Papua New Guinea | 88.74 | -12.2% |
| 25th | Ireland | 88.91 | -13.1% |
| 26th | Spain | 90.98 | -1.7% |
| 27th | Greece | 91.45 | -13.2% |
| 28th | Georgia | 91.67 | -2.5% |
| 29th | Norway | 91.91 | -23.5% |
| 30th | Côte d'Ivoire | 92.52 | 6.8% |
| 31st | Costa Rica | 92.58 | 2.1% |
| 32nd | Central African Republic | 94.25 | -2.3% |
| 33rd | Malta | 94.39 | 2.9% |
| 34th | Croatia | 94.56 | -2.7% |
| 35th | Philippines | 95.47 | -1.2% |
| 36th | Cyprus | 95.67 | -2.4% |
| 37th | Serbia | 95.91 | -16.1% |
| 38th | Portugal | 95.95 | -1.3% |
| 39th | Luxembourg | 96.09 | 0.2% |
| 40th | Malaysia | 96.39 | -30.5% |
| 41st | Switzerland | 96.58 | 10.0% |
| 42nd | Denmark | 97.15 | 3.3% |
| 43rd | Korea | 97.89 | -10.3% |
| 44th | China | 98.01 | 32.6% |
| 45th | Togo | 98.25 | 4.2% |
| 46th | Mexico | 98.39 | -21.0% |
| 47th | Netherlands | 98.59 | 3.6% |
| 48th | Belgium | 98.75 | 3.0% |
| 49th | Colombia | 99.08 | -25.5% |
| 50th | Italy | 99.25 | -3.7% |
| 51st | Peru | 99.46 | 0.7% |
| 52nd | Slovenia | 99.75 | 4.7% |
| 53rd | Guyana | 99.87 | 1.1% |
| 54th | Cameroon | 100.42 | 3.5% |
| 55th | Paraguay | 101.89 | -8.8% |
| 56th | North Macedonia | 102.08 | -5.1% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 102.64 | 0.1% |
| 58th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 102.70 | 3.1% |
| 59th | Austria | 103.30 | 3.9% |
| 60th | St. Lucia | 104.96 | 2.5% |
| 61st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 104.97 | 1.3% |
| 62nd | Solomon Islands | 104.99 | -3.2% |
| 63rd | France | 105.61 | -4.1% |
| 64th | Singapore | 105.89 | 3.9% |
| 65th | Finland | 106.34 | 0.8% |
| 66th | Brazil | 106.76 | -35.8% |
| 67th | Japan | 107.01 | -21.9% |
| 68th | Gabon | 107.04 | 0.7% |
| 69th | Nicaragua | 107.16 | 1.9% |
| 70th | Grenada | 108.50 | 0.6% |
| 71st | Uruguay | 109.02 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Fiji | 109.38 | -14.9% |
| 73rd | South Africa | 109.66 | -29.4% |
| 74th | Germany | 110.39 | -1.6% |
| 75th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 111.62 | 4.6% |
| 76th | Belize | 111.74 | 3.2% |
| 77th | Israel | 112.24 | 10.9% |
| 78th | Morocco | 112.26 | 6.8% |
| 79th | Chile | 112.71 | -12.8% |
| 80th | United States | 116.72 | 28.0% |
| 81st | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 116.74 | 1.8% |
| 82nd | Sweden | 117.05 | -13.9% |
| 83rd | Bahamas, The | 118.06 | 5.7% |
| 84th | Pakistan | 118.75 | 1.5% |
| 85th | Antigua and Barbuda | 119.51 | 3.6% |
| 86th | Sierra Leone | 120.30 | -14.7% |
| 87th | Dominica | 120.40 | 0.5% |
| 88th | Türkiye | 124.11 | 9.7% |
| 89th | Ukraine | 124.71 | -8.6% |
| 90th | Ghana | 128.43 | 6.8% |
| 91st | Saudi Arabia | 128.69 | 29.6% |
| 92nd | Malawi | 129.05 | -25.5% |
| 93rd | United Kingdom | 129.27 | 3.6% |
| 94th | Bahrain | 130.22 | 2.3% |
| 95th | Tunisia | 131.72 | 0.3% |
| 96th | Iceland | 131.95 | 28.4% |
| 97th | Algeria | 135.45 | -4.2% |
| 98th | Uganda | 135.59 | -11.1% |
| 99th | Burundi | 145.11 | -8.7% |
| 100th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 153.40 | 32.9% |
| 101st | Lesotho | 164.42 | -8.2% |
| 102nd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 180.79 | 23.8% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 196.61 | -0.5% |
| 104th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 238.72 | 6.9% |
| 105th | Nigeria | 273.00 | 15.7% |
| 106th | Argentina | 436.20 | 3.9% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1998?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1998 was 153.40. This ranked 100th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1998?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 32.9% in 1998 compared to 1997.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1998?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1998 at 436.20.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1998?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1998 was 153.40. This ranked 100th globally.
How does 1998 compare to 1997 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 135.65 in 1997 to 153.40 in 1998, a 32.9% increase.
Related
1997
1999
All years
Full ranking 1998
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking