Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2019
127.26
+30.99 from 2018
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 127.26 in 2019, increased +30.99 from 121.44 in 2018. This was the 101st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2019▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Brazil | 70.01 | -45.5% |
| 2nd | Ghana | 73.47 | -4.1% |
| 3rd | Colombia | 73.66 | -36.0% |
| 4th | Japan | 76.62 | -20.4% |
| 5th | South Africa | 78.27 | -31.8% |
| 6th | Tunisia | 78.39 | -1.1% |
| 7th | Zambia | 79.81 | -9.8% |
| 8th | Lesotho | 79.94 | -2.1% |
| 9th | Canada | 81.71 | -19.9% |
| 10th | Mexico | 83.53 | -20.3% |
| 11th | Norway | 83.62 | -23.9% |
| 12th | Sweden | 85.71 | -15.6% |
| 13th | Australia | 86.03 | -18.8% |
| 14th | Malawi | 86.89 | 10.0% |
| 15th | Dominican Republic | 87.01 | -0.9% |
| 16th | Cyprus | 87.44 | -13.7% |
| 17th | Malaysia | 87.48 | -16.8% |
| 18th | Russian Federation | 87.73 | -16.7% |
| 19th | Ireland | 88.03 | -14.3% |
| 20th | Greece | 88.70 | -13.6% |
| 21st | Hungary | 89.08 | -15.3% |
| 22nd | Malta | 91.81 | -7.8% |
| 23rd | Chile | 92.14 | -19.6% |
| 24th | Poland | 92.37 | -8.1% |
| 25th | Georgia | 92.64 | -4.7% |
| 26th | Ukraine | 93.37 | 15.7% |
| 27th | Gambia, The | 93.43 | 5.1% |
| 28th | France | 93.90 | -6.8% |
| 29th | Togo | 93.96 | -2.5% |
| 30th | Côte d'Ivoire | 94.09 | -2.2% |
| 31st | Croatia | 94.10 | -8.0% |
| 32nd | Italy | 94.57 | -7.1% |
| 33rd | Algeria | 95.45 | -6.4% |
| 34th | Germany | 95.47 | -4.9% |
| 35th | Uganda | 95.48 | 3.6% |
| 36th | Denmark | 95.55 | -4.9% |
| 37th | Spain | 95.94 | -5.4% |
| 38th | Nicaragua | 96.01 | 0.1% |
| 39th | Dominica | 96.08 | 2.0% |
| 40th | Grenada | 96.42 | 0.8% |
| 41st | Portugal | 96.45 | -4.7% |
| 42nd | Cameroon | 96.74 | -1.0% |
| 43rd | Finland | 96.99 | -3.5% |
| 44th | Romania | 97.25 | -1.6% |
| 45th | Pakistan | 97.27 | -9.2% |
| 46th | Serbia | 97.36 | 0.0% |
| 47th | Lithuania | 98.12 | 0.1% |
| 48th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 98.26 | -0.2% |
| 49th | North Macedonia | 98.27 | -1.6% |
| 50th | United Kingdom | 98.60 | -1.6% |
| 51st | Argentina | 98.85 | -11.4% |
| 52nd | India | 99.37 | 2.0% |
| 53rd | Czechia | 99.59 | 0.6% |
| 54th | Luxembourg | 99.60 | -0.1% |
| 55th | Slovenia | 99.72 | -0.4% |
| 56th | Belgium | 99.80 | -0.3% |
| 57th | Netherlands | 99.81 | 1.5% |
| 58th | Estonia | 99.85 | -0.1% |
| 59th | Morocco | 100.22 | 2.1% |
| 60th | Gabon | 100.59 | -0.6% |
| 61st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.67 | -1.6% |
| 62nd | Slovak Republic | 100.82 | 3.7% |
| 63rd | Peru | 101.39 | 2.3% |
| 64th | New Zealand | 101.68 | -0.8% |
| 65th | Austria | 101.73 | 2.5% |
| 66th | Indonesia | 101.81 | 4.5% |
| 67th | Equatorial Guinea | 102.05 | -2.2% |
| 68th | Bahamas, The | 102.09 | 1.6% |
| 69th | Bulgaria | 102.38 | 6.2% |
| 70th | Armenia | 102.40 | 3.5% |
| 71st | St. Lucia | 102.59 | 0.9% |
| 72nd | Thailand | 102.85 | 5.8% |
| 73rd | Latvia | 103.29 | 4.5% |
| 74th | United Arab Emirates | 103.47 | -0.7% |
| 75th | Sierra Leone | 103.97 | 3.2% |
| 76th | Belize | 103.99 | 0.4% |
| 77th | Switzerland | 104.19 | 9.4% |
| 78th | Philippines | 105.39 | 16.9% |
| 79th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 105.57 | 2.5% |
| 80th | Samoa | 105.67 | 0.8% |
| 81st | Singapore | 106.56 | 4.1% |
| 82nd | Costa Rica | 106.75 | 0.6% |
| 83rd | Guyana | 106.85 | 1.8% |
| 84th | Israel | 109.13 | 15.0% |
| 85th | Paraguay | 110.29 | -3.0% |
| 86th | Bahrain | 110.78 | 2.2% |
| 87th | Türkiye | 110.83 | -1.1% |
| 88th | Antigua and Barbuda | 111.85 | 3.4% |
| 89th | Saudi Arabia | 112.94 | 15.0% |
| 90th | Uruguay | 113.80 | -3.2% |
| 91st | Fiji | 114.07 | 0.6% |
| 92nd | Burundi | 114.16 | -3.2% |
| 93rd | United States | 116.45 | 21.6% |
| 94th | China | 121.18 | 23.3% |
| 95th | Nigeria | 124.19 | 13.0% |
| 96th | Papua New Guinea | 124.68 | 3.2% |
| 97th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 124.79 | 5.7% |
| 98th | Central African Republic | 125.22 | -0.6% |
| 99th | Moldova | 125.59 | 2.1% |
| 100th | Trinidad and Tobago | 126.78 | 1.7% |
| 101st | Hong Kong SAR, China | 127.26 | 32.2% |
| 102nd | Solomon Islands | 127.50 | 0.5% |
| 103rd | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 128.83 | 10.6% |
| 104th | Iceland | 130.68 | 12.6% |
| 105th | Korea | 147.62 | 38.4% |
| 106th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 150.78 | 4.6% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2019?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2019 was 127.26. This ranked 101st globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2019?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 32.2% in 2019 compared to 2018.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2019?▾
Bolivia, Plurinational State of had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2019 at 150.78.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2019?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2019 was 127.26. This ranked 101st globally.
How does 2019 compare to 2018 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 121.44 in 2018 to 127.26 in 2019, a 32.2% increase.
Related
2018
2020
All years
Full ranking 2019
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking