Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 2021
125.88
+25.88 from 2020
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 125.88 in 2021, increased +25.88 from 132.63 in 2020. This was the 99th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2021▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Brazil | 53.79 | -46.2% |
| 2nd | Colombia | 65.81 | -34.2% |
| 3rd | Zambia | 69.77 | 5.0% |
| 4th | Japan | 70.69 | -29.3% |
| 5th | Ghana | 74.27 | -0.5% |
| 6th | South Africa | 77.68 | -22.3% |
| 7th | Russian Federation | 79.43 | -20.6% |
| 8th | Mexico | 81.64 | -18.4% |
| 9th | Lesotho | 81.69 | 8.7% |
| 10th | Norway | 83.09 | -16.9% |
| 11th | Malaysia | 83.28 | -16.7% |
| 12th | Dominican Republic | 83.34 | 1.5% |
| 13th | Canada | 84.76 | -15.2% |
| 14th | Tunisia | 85.85 | 0.8% |
| 15th | Hungary | 86.10 | -13.9% |
| 16th | Algeria | 86.80 | -13.2% |
| 17th | Chile | 87.50 | -12.5% |
| 18th | Greece | 87.67 | -12.3% |
| 19th | Cyprus | 87.68 | -12.3% |
| 20th | Ireland | 88.22 | -11.8% |
| 21st | Peru | 88.24 | -11.8% |
| 22nd | Türkiye | 89.89 | -10.1% |
| 23rd | Malawi | 90.18 | -4.7% |
| 24th | Sweden | 90.28 | -9.7% |
| 25th | Australia | 90.54 | -9.5% |
| 26th | Georgia | 91.17 | 1.8% |
| 27th | Poland | 92.59 | -7.4% |
| 28th | Grenada | 92.86 | -3.0% |
| 29th | Nicaragua | 93.03 | -3.1% |
| 30th | Malta | 93.13 | -6.9% |
| 31st | Croatia | 93.99 | -6.0% |
| 32nd | Ukraine | 94.13 | 2.3% |
| 33rd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 94.17 | -3.1% |
| 34th | Dominica | 94.29 | -1.1% |
| 35th | France | 94.42 | -5.6% |
| 36th | Thailand | 94.45 | -5.6% |
| 37th | Italy | 94.92 | -5.1% |
| 38th | United Arab Emirates | 94.93 | -5.1% |
| 39th | Denmark | 95.97 | -4.0% |
| 40th | Portugal | 96.65 | -3.3% |
| 41st | Gambia, The | 96.90 | 1.5% |
| 42nd | Germany | 97.14 | -2.9% |
| 43rd | Spain | 97.28 | -2.7% |
| 44th | Finland | 97.81 | -2.2% |
| 45th | Togo | 97.83 | 1.9% |
| 46th | Costa Rica | 98.00 | -9.1% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 98.50 | -1.5% |
| 48th | St. Lucia | 98.58 | -2.2% |
| 49th | Uganda | 98.72 | 1.5% |
| 50th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.40 | -0.6% |
| 51st | Côte d'Ivoire | 99.55 | 2.0% |
| 52nd | Romania | 99.56 | -0.4% |
| 53rd | Slovenia | 99.65 | -0.4% |
| 54th | Bahamas, The | 99.75 | -1.7% |
| 55th | Cameroon | 99.83 | 0.1% |
| 56th | India | 99.90 | -0.1% |
| 57th | Armenia | 100.26 | -2.0% |
| 58th | Pakistan | 100.28 | 2.8% |
| 59th | North Macedonia | 100.43 | 0.4% |
| 60th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.89 | -3.0% |
| 61st | Luxembourg | 101.17 | 1.2% |
| 62nd | Belgium | 101.40 | 1.4% |
| 63rd | Estonia | 101.72 | 1.7% |
| 64th | Serbia | 101.78 | 1.8% |
| 65th | Lithuania | 101.79 | 1.8% |
| 66th | Belize | 101.95 | -2.3% |
| 67th | Netherlands | 102.10 | 2.1% |
| 68th | Gabon | 102.14 | -1.1% |
| 69th | Bahrain | 102.30 | -4.6% |
| 70th | United Kingdom | 102.62 | 2.6% |
| 71st | Argentina | 103.10 | 3.1% |
| 72nd | Morocco | 103.18 | 3.2% |
| 73rd | Singapore | 103.41 | 3.4% |
| 74th | Slovak Republic | 103.72 | 3.7% |
| 75th | Austria | 104.00 | 4.0% |
| 76th | Samoa | 104.08 | 0.5% |
| 77th | Czechia | 104.87 | 4.9% |
| 78th | Latvia | 105.02 | 5.0% |
| 79th | Switzerland | 105.52 | 5.5% |
| 80th | Equatorial Guinea | 105.85 | -2.2% |
| 81st | Uruguay | 106.21 | -2.2% |
| 82nd | Sierra Leone | 106.66 | -0.5% |
| 83rd | Bulgaria | 106.75 | 6.8% |
| 84th | New Zealand | 107.61 | 7.6% |
| 85th | Paraguay | 107.76 | -1.0% |
| 86th | Guyana | 108.33 | 0.9% |
| 87th | Antigua and Barbuda | 108.36 | -3.4% |
| 88th | Fiji | 108.37 | -1.8% |
| 89th | Philippines | 111.12 | 11.1% |
| 90th | Saudi Arabia | 113.56 | 13.6% |
| 91st | Israel | 114.32 | 14.3% |
| 92nd | United States | 115.63 | 15.6% |
| 93rd | Burundi | 116.67 | 0.3% |
| 94th | Nigeria | 117.04 | -2.1% |
| 95th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 118.31 | -6.3% |
| 96th | Papua New Guinea | 122.53 | -3.9% |
| 97th | Trinidad and Tobago | 123.94 | -3.2% |
| 98th | Solomon Islands | 124.75 | -3.9% |
| 99th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 125.88 | 25.9% |
| 100th | Iceland | 126.72 | 26.7% |
| 101st | China | 127.32 | 27.3% |
| 102nd | Moldova | 128.41 | -2.7% |
| 103rd | Central African Republic | 130.67 | 2.2% |
| 104th | Korea | 138.97 | 39.0% |
| 105th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 152.44 | -4.1% |
| 106th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 230.38 | 37.5% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2021?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 2021 was 125.88. This ranked 99th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 2021?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 25.9% in 2021 compared to 2020.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2021?▾
Iran, Islamic Republic of had the highest real effective exchange rate in 2021 at 230.38.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2021?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2021 was 125.88. This ranked 99th globally.
How does 2021 compare to 2020 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 132.63 in 2020 to 125.88 in 2021, a 25.9% increase.
Related
2020
2022
All years
Full ranking 2021
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking