Macao SAR, China - Control of Corruption 2008
0.43
−0.02 from 2007
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption was 0.43 in 2008, decreased +0.02 from 0.45 in 2007. This was the 58th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2008▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Denmark | 2.38 | -2.4% |
| 2nd | Iceland | 2.33 | 5.9% |
| 3rd | Finland | 2.32 | -2.9% |
| 4th | New Zealand | 2.30 | -0.9% |
| 5th | Singapore | 2.23 | 0.0% |
| 6th | Sweden | 2.21 | -1.0% |
| 7th | Switzerland | 2.11 | -1.5% |
| 8th | Netherlands | 2.10 | -2.6% |
| 9th | Australia | 2.03 | 1.3% |
| 10th | Canada | 1.99 | -0.2% |
| 11th | Luxembourg | 1.96 | -0.2% |
| 12th | Norway | 1.89 | -4.6% |
| 13th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1.89 | -1.1% |
| 14th | Austria | 1.83 | -8.7% |
| 15th | Germany | 1.75 | 1.1% |
| 16th | Ireland | 1.74 | -0.2% |
| 17th | United Kingdom | 1.67 | -3.7% |
| 18th | United States | 1.44 | 4.4% |
| 19th | France | 1.40 | -4.2% |
| 20th | Belgium | 1.36 | 1.1% |
| 21st | Barbados | 1.36 | -3.1% |
| 22nd | Uruguay | 1.35 | 5.1% |
| 23rd | Bahamas, The | 1.33 | 0.2% |
| 24th | Japan | 1.32 | 7.6% |
| 25th | Chile | 1.32 | -2.0% |
| 26th | St. Lucia | 1.31 | 11.5% |
| 27th | Aruba | 1.28 | 1.2% |
| 28th | Andorra | 1.28 | 1.2% |
| 29th | Antigua and Barbuda | 1.28 | 11.3% |
| 30th | Bermuda | 1.28 | 1.2% |
| 31st | St. Kitts and Nevis | 1.28 | 11.3% |
| 32nd | Cyprus | 1.19 | 11.2% |
| 33rd | Spain | 1.18 | 9.2% |
| 34th | Liechtenstein | 1.18 | 8.3% |
| 35th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.13 | 14.0% |
| 36th | United Arab Emirates | 1.07 | 6.5% |
| 37th | Portugal | 1.06 | 3.0% |
| 38th | Botswana | 1.02 | 2.9% |
| 39th | Malta | 0.99 | -2.8% |
| 40th | Estonia | 0.95 | -1.6% |
| 41st | Slovenia | 0.94 | -7.0% |
| 42nd | Qatar | 0.93 | 39.0% |
| 43rd | Bhutan | 0.91 | -1.8% |
| 44th | Cabo Verde | 0.90 | -2.0% |
| 45th | Israel | 0.88 | 4.9% |
| 46th | Cayman Islands | 0.80 | -36.8% |
| 47th | Guam | 0.80 | 1.6% |
| 48th | Virgin Islands (US) | 0.80 | 1.6% |
| 49th | Dominica | 0.79 | 12.1% |
| 50th | Namibia | 0.64 | 105.7% |
| 51st | Seychelles | 0.56 | 67.4% |
| 52nd | Oman | 0.51 | 46.9% |
| 53rd | Costa Rica | 0.49 | 7.9% |
| 54th | Brunei Darussalam | 0.48 | 130.6% |
| 55th | Poland | 0.45 | 59.5% |
| 56th | Mauritius | 0.44 | 25.4% |
| 57th | Hungary | 0.43 | -27.1% |
| 58th | Macao SAR, China | 0.43 | -3.8% |
| 59th | Korea | 0.43 | -25.3% |
| 60th | Kuwait | 0.41 | 12.9% |
| 61st | Puerto Rico (US) | 0.41 | 0.5% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 0.38 | 32.3% |
| 63rd | Grenada | 0.38 | -15.0% |
| 64th | Vanuatu | 0.36 | 30.8% |
| 65th | Czechia | 0.34 | 7.0% |
| 66th | American Samoa | 0.32 | 3.1% |
| 67th | Slovak Republic | 0.31 | 5.2% |
| 68th | Cuba | 0.26 | -12.7% |
| 69th | Italy | 0.26 | -20.7% |
| 70th | Samoa | 0.26 | -14.2% |
| 71st | Latvia | 0.23 | -32.0% |
| 72nd | Bahrain | 0.18 | 3.6% |
| 73rd | South Africa | 0.15 | -22.2% |
| 74th | Greece | 0.13 | -51.6% |
| 75th | Türkiye | 0.12 | 2.5% |
| 76th | Lithuania | 0.11 | 9.1% |
| 77th | Rwanda | 0.11 | 1,439.3% |
| 78th | Fiji | 0.10 | -19.0% |
| 79th | Lesotho | 0.06 | 206.3% |
| 80th | Kiribati | 0.04 | -72.6% |
| 81st | Eswatini | 0.04 | 180.3% |
| 82nd | Brazil | 0.00 | 104.1% |
| 83rd | Saudi Arabia | -0.01 | 91.3% |
| 84th | Suriname | -0.03 | -124.5% |
| 85th | Croatia | -0.05 | -185.5% |
| 86th | Ghana | -0.08 | -303.0% |
| 87th | Trinidad and Tobago | -0.08 | -61.5% |
| 88th | Malaysia | -0.09 | -154.3% |
| 89th | Panama | -0.10 | 70.2% |
| 90th | Georgia | -0.10 | 20.8% |
| 91st | Tunisia | -0.17 | -51.3% |
| 92nd | Romania | -0.19 | 19.2% |
| 93rd | Peru | -0.21 | 24.1% |
| 94th | North Macedonia | -0.21 | 46.4% |
| 95th | Micronesia, Federated States of | -0.22 | 9.5% |
| 96th | Tuvalu | -0.22 | 9.5% |
| 97th | Sri Lanka | -0.22 | -49.6% |
| 98th | Montenegro | -0.24 | 37.2% |
| 99th | Colombia | -0.26 | 6.3% |
| 100th | Madagascar | -0.27 | -43.4% |
| 101st | Bulgaria | -0.27 | -18.5% |
| 102nd | São Tomé and Principe | -0.29 | -1.6% |
| 103rd | Serbia | -0.30 | 11.5% |
| 104th | Belize | -0.30 | 6.7% |
| 105th | Djibouti | -0.30 | 44.1% |
| 106th | Burkina Faso | -0.31 | 6.2% |
| 107th | Mexico | -0.31 | 9.3% |
| 108th | Nauru | -0.33 | 7.9% |
| 109th | Palau | -0.33 | - |
| 110th | Jamaica | -0.34 | 0.5% |
| 111th | India | -0.34 | 14.7% |
| 112th | Solomon Islands | -0.35 | 5.5% |
| 113th | Eritrea | -0.36 | 13.0% |
| 114th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.36 | 3.6% |
| 115th | Zambia | -0.39 | 2.1% |
| 116th | El Salvador | -0.41 | 2.8% |
| 117th | Tanzania | -0.42 | -24.0% |
| 118th | Morocco | -0.43 | -12.1% |
| 119th | Argentina | -0.43 | -16.9% |
| 120th | West Bank and Gaza | -0.44 | -276.9% |
| 121st | Thailand | -0.44 | -10.1% |
| 122nd | Malawi | -0.45 | 13.6% |
| 123rd | Mozambique | -0.49 | 5.0% |
| 124th | Senegal | -0.50 | 2.7% |
| 125th | Benin | -0.51 | -9.3% |
| 126th | China | -0.53 | 12.2% |
| 127th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | -0.53 | -31.4% |
| 128th | Mali | -0.54 | -26.1% |
| 129th | Guyana | -0.56 | 6.0% |
| 130th | Belarus | -0.56 | 2.6% |
| 131st | Albania | -0.61 | 14.4% |
| 132nd | Algeria | -0.63 | -6.9% |
| 133rd | Moldova | -0.63 | 4.0% |
| 134th | Indonesia | -0.64 | -1.4% |
| 135th | Kosovo | -0.65 | 11.8% |
| 136th | Timor-Leste | -0.65 | -0.2% |
| 137th | Ecuador | -0.65 | 12.2% |
| 138th | Mongolia | -0.66 | -8.3% |
| 139th | Guatemala | -0.67 | 13.3% |
| 140th | Tonga | -0.68 | 35.6% |
| 141st | Viet Nam | -0.71 | -12.9% |
| 142nd | Armenia | -0.71 | 4.5% |
| 143rd | Gambia, The | -0.71 | -0.3% |
| 144th | Niger | -0.73 | 4.0% |
| 145th | Dominican Republic | -0.75 | 3.0% |
| 146th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | -0.76 | -35.8% |
| 147th | Marshall Islands | -0.76 | 7.0% |
| 148th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | -0.77 | -3.8% |
| 149th | Nicaragua | -0.77 | -0.2% |
| 150th | Comoros | -0.77 | -11.7% |
| 151st | Philippines | -0.78 | 0.0% |
| 152nd | Mauritania | -0.79 | -36.2% |
| 153rd | Liberia | -0.79 | -66.0% |
| 154th | Yemen, Republic of | -0.80 | -0.5% |
| 155th | Nepal | -0.82 | -3.3% |
| 156th | Maldives | -0.82 | 4.7% |
| 157th | Uganda | -0.84 | -1.7% |
| 158th | Lebanon | -0.86 | 8.6% |
| 159th | Ukraine | -0.86 | -5.2% |
| 160th | Pakistan | -0.90 | -9.8% |
| 161st | Nigeria | -0.90 | 15.6% |
| 162nd | Honduras | -0.92 | -15.7% |
| 163rd | Libya | -0.98 | 6.9% |
| 164th | Togo | -0.98 | 2.2% |
| 165th | Sierra Leone | -0.98 | -6.5% |
| 166th | Paraguay | -0.98 | 19.1% |
| 167th | Kazakhstan | -0.98 | 1.2% |
| 168th | Cameroon | -1.03 | -0.1% |
| 169th | Bangladesh | -1.05 | 1.5% |
| 170th | Uzbekistan | -1.06 | -2.8% |
| 171st | Kenya | -1.07 | -9.2% |
| 172nd | Syrian Arab Republic | -1.07 | -6.0% |
| 173rd | Burundi | -1.09 | 6.7% |
| 174th | Côte d'Ivoire | -1.12 | -2.2% |
| 175th | Russian Federation | -1.13 | -10.6% |
| 176th | Central African Republic | -1.14 | 6.1% |
| 177th | Azerbaijan | -1.16 | -2.4% |
| 178th | Gabon | -1.17 | 0.1% |
| 179th | Papua New Guinea | -1.18 | -5.2% |
| 180th | Tajikistan | -1.19 | -14.0% |
| 181st | Congo, Republic of | -1.19 | -2.8% |
| 182nd | Equatorial Guinea | -1.20 | 1.1% |
| 183rd | Guinea-Bissau | -1.20 | 0.4% |
| 184th | Lao PDR | -1.21 | 5.9% |
| 185th | Guinea | -1.21 | 6.3% |
| 186th | Haiti | -1.22 | 5.8% |
| 187th | Kyrgyz Republic | -1.23 | 7.3% |
| 188th | Cambodia | -1.24 | -7.8% |
| 189th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -1.26 | 8.7% |
| 190th | Angola | -1.31 | -0.1% |
| 191st | Zimbabwe | -1.35 | 4.0% |
| 192nd | Turkmenistan | -1.40 | 0.5% |
| 193rd | Sudan | -1.43 | -7.3% |
| 194th | Iraq | -1.46 | -0.1% |
| 195th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | -1.52 | 1.7% |
| 196th | Chad | -1.53 | -10.5% |
| 197th | Myanmar | -1.62 | 0.6% |
| 198th | Afghanistan | -1.67 | -3.6% |
| 199th | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | -1.85 | -6.3% |
FAQ
What was Macao SAR, China's control of corruption in 2008?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption in 2008 was 0.43. This ranked 58th globally.
How did Macao SAR, China's control of corruption change in 2008?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption decreased by 3.8% in 2008 compared to 2007.
Which country had the highest control of corruption in 2008?▾
Denmark had the highest control of corruption in 2008 at 2.38.
What is the control of corruption of Macao SAR, China in 2008?▾
The control of corruption of Macao SAR, China in 2008 was 0.43. This ranked 58th globally.
How does 2008 compare to 2007 for Macao SAR, China's control of corruption?▾
Macao SAR, China's control of corruption went from 0.45 in 2007 to 0.43 in 2008, a 3.8% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Macao SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2008. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 25.1%. View full analysis →
Related
2007
2009
All years
Full ranking 2008
Political Stability
Government Effectiveness
Regulatory Quality
Rule of Law
Voice and Accountability
Peak: 2004
Lowest: 2002
Control of Corruption 1990s
Control of Corruption 2000s
Control of Corruption 2010s
Control of Corruption 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Channel Islands
vs Faroe Islands
vs Denmark
vs Netherlands
Global Ranking