Mali - Government Effectiveness 2003
-0.72
−0.03 from 2002
Mali's government effectiveness was -0.72 in 2003, decreased +0.03 from -0.70 in 2002. This was the 132nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Finland | 2.19 | 4.7% |
| 2nd | Denmark | 2.09 | 3.2% |
| 3rd | Iceland | 2.04 | 4.2% |
| 4th | Sweden | 2.02 | 2.8% |
| 5th | Netherlands | 1.95 | 1.1% |
| 6th | Austria | 1.93 | 2.7% |
| 7th | Singapore | 1.93 | 7.5% |
| 8th | Canada | 1.92 | 3.4% |
| 9th | Belgium | 1.87 | -2.4% |
| 10th | Luxembourg | 1.86 | -6.0% |
| 11th | Norway | 1.83 | 0.0% |
| 12th | Spain | 1.82 | 1.7% |
| 13th | Australia | 1.77 | 6.9% |
| 14th | New Zealand | 1.76 | 5.0% |
| 15th | Switzerland | 1.75 | -9.5% |
| 16th | United Kingdom | 1.75 | -1.9% |
| 17th | France | 1.65 | 6.9% |
| 18th | Liechtenstein | 1.61 | -1.7% |
| 19th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 1.59 | 19.5% |
| 20th | United States | 1.54 | -5.0% |
| 21st | Ireland | 1.50 | -4.8% |
| 22nd | Germany | 1.36 | -18.2% |
| 23rd | Andorra | 1.35 | -1.4% |
| 24th | Barbados | 1.35 | -1.4% |
| 25th | Cayman Islands | 1.35 | -29.0% |
| 26th | Macao SAR, China | 1.35 | 61.6% |
| 27th | Bahamas, The | 1.22 | -2.6% |
| 28th | Japan | 1.16 | 13.8% |
| 29th | Israel | 1.14 | 10.6% |
| 30th | Cyprus | 1.12 | -13.3% |
| 31st | Portugal | 1.11 | -4.0% |
| 32nd | Chile | 1.10 | 2.0% |
| 33rd | Bermuda | 1.09 | -0.9% |
| 34th | Puerto Rico (US) | 1.09 | -0.9% |
| 35th | Malaysia | 1.04 | 13.0% |
| 36th | Slovenia | 0.90 | 13.7% |
| 37th | Estonia | 0.88 | 31.8% |
| 38th | Malta | 0.88 | -16.3% |
| 39th | Czechia | 0.85 | -7.4% |
| 40th | Dominica | 0.83 | -0.1% |
| 41st | Hungary | 0.83 | -16.6% |
| 42nd | Korea | 0.79 | -0.7% |
| 43rd | Italy | 0.74 | -1.2% |
| 44th | Mauritius | 0.74 | 99.8% |
| 45th | Lithuania | 0.73 | 47.7% |
| 46th | Greece | 0.70 | -9.3% |
| 47th | Brunei Darussalam | 0.69 | -18.5% |
| 48th | Slovak Republic | 0.67 | 23.5% |
| 49th | Botswana | 0.62 | 15.4% |
| 50th | South Africa | 0.60 | -1.4% |
| 51st | Latvia | 0.60 | 22.9% |
| 52nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 0.58 | 1.5% |
| 53rd | Bhutan | 0.58 | 1.5% |
| 54th | Grenada | 0.58 | 1.5% |
| 55th | Maldives | 0.58 | -30.9% |
| 56th | Seychelles | 0.58 | 1.5% |
| 57th | United Arab Emirates | 0.54 | -32.5% |
| 58th | Poland | 0.51 | 12.0% |
| 59th | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.47 | 38.7% |
| 60th | Tunisia | 0.47 | -10.0% |
| 61st | Uruguay | 0.46 | -22.4% |
| 62nd | Oman | 0.44 | 27.2% |
| 63rd | Qatar | 0.44 | -1.8% |
| 64th | Bahrain | 0.41 | -19.1% |
| 65th | Belize | 0.32 | 5.9% |
| 66th | Samoa | 0.32 | 5.9% |
| 67th | Croatia | 0.32 | -3.0% |
| 68th | Thailand | 0.31 | 16.9% |
| 69th | Namibia | 0.25 | 43.9% |
| 70th | Costa Rica | 0.21 | -31.0% |
| 71st | Jordan | 0.14 | 82.4% |
| 72nd | Mexico | 0.13 | -39.6% |
| 73rd | Brazil | 0.08 | 336.2% |
| 74th | Kuwait | 0.07 | 6.3% |
| 75th | Fiji | 0.06 | -79.5% |
| 76th | Lesotho | 0.05 | 49.9% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 0.03 | -33.7% |
| 78th | Bulgaria | 0.03 | -80.6% |
| 79th | Jamaica | -0.02 | 76.4% |
| 80th | Guyana | -0.02 | 87.2% |
| 81st | Argentina | -0.03 | 85.0% |
| 82nd | Panama | -0.11 | -300.5% |
| 83rd | India | -0.14 | 23.9% |
| 84th | Philippines | -0.15 | 17.9% |
| 85th | Lebanon | -0.15 | 29.0% |
| 86th | China | -0.15 | -19.9% |
| 87th | Suriname | -0.16 | 23.0% |
| 88th | Mauritania | -0.20 | 15.6% |
| 89th | Armenia | -0.20 | -331.0% |
| 90th | Georgia | -0.20 | 72.1% |
| 91st | Mongolia | -0.21 | -86.4% |
| 92nd | Morocco | -0.22 | -10.5% |
| 93rd | Colombia | -0.22 | 54.5% |
| 94th | Sri Lanka | -0.27 | -272.9% |
| 95th | Cabo Verde | -0.28 | -4.7% |
| 96th | Romania | -0.28 | -44.2% |
| 97th | Ghana | -0.29 | -228.2% |
| 98th | Cuba | -0.35 | 39.5% |
| 99th | Saudi Arabia | -0.37 | -8.5% |
| 100th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | -0.38 | -16.9% |
| 101st | Senegal | -0.39 | -746.0% |
| 102nd | Egypt, Arab Republic of | -0.39 | 12.6% |
| 103rd | Viet Nam | -0.40 | 7.9% |
| 104th | North Macedonia | -0.41 | 28.4% |
| 105th | Madagascar | -0.42 | -28.3% |
| 106th | Gambia, The | -0.42 | 32.3% |
| 107th | Gabon | -0.43 | -50.5% |
| 108th | Uganda | -0.45 | 5.9% |
| 109th | São Tomé and Principe | -0.45 | 9.1% |
| 110th | El Salvador | -0.46 | 24.5% |
| 111th | Russian Federation | -0.50 | -32.7% |
| 112th | Tanzania | -0.50 | -2.4% |
| 113th | Papua New Guinea | -0.53 | -7.2% |
| 114th | Mozambique | -0.54 | -23.7% |
| 115th | Dominican Republic | -0.56 | -43.7% |
| 116th | Kyrgyz Republic | -0.56 | 1.3% |
| 117th | Benin | -0.56 | 2.6% |
| 118th | Albania | -0.56 | 9.7% |
| 119th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | -0.57 | 8.3% |
| 120th | Guatemala | -0.57 | -1.4% |
| 121st | Peru | -0.59 | -49.5% |
| 122nd | Pakistan | -0.59 | -6.7% |
| 123rd | Indonesia | -0.60 | -8.3% |
| 124th | Niger | -0.65 | 20.9% |
| 125th | Serbia | -0.67 | -19.9% |
| 126th | Moldova | -0.67 | -13.8% |
| 127th | Ukraine | -0.67 | 3.1% |
| 128th | Algeria | -0.67 | -9.8% |
| 129th | Kenya | -0.71 | 6.7% |
| 130th | Djibouti | -0.71 | 7.1% |
| 131st | Eswatini | -0.71 | -42.6% |
| 132nd | Mali | -0.72 | -3.7% |
| 133rd | Honduras | -0.76 | -11.1% |
| 134th | Kazakhstan | -0.77 | 28.8% |
| 135th | Guinea | -0.77 | 20.0% |
| 136th | Malawi | -0.78 | -1.9% |
| 137th | Nicaragua | -0.79 | 9.5% |
| 138th | Nepal | -0.80 | -33.9% |
| 139th | Burkina Faso | -0.81 | 4.0% |
| 140th | Bangladesh | -0.84 | -15.4% |
| 141st | Eritrea | -0.84 | -13.8% |
| 142nd | Cameroon | -0.84 | 7.5% |
| 143rd | Yemen, Republic of | -0.86 | 3.2% |
| 144th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | -0.88 | 17.9% |
| 145th | Nigeria | -0.92 | 10.2% |
| 146th | Cambodia | -0.92 | -13.6% |
| 147th | Libya | -0.93 | 9.8% |
| 148th | Azerbaijan | -0.93 | 5.3% |
| 149th | Zimbabwe | -0.94 | -11.4% |
| 150th | Ecuador | -0.94 | -12.6% |
| 151st | Timor-Leste | -0.97 | -26.6% |
| 152nd | Paraguay | -1.00 | 10.4% |
| 153rd | Zambia | -1.01 | -9.0% |
| 154th | Lao PDR | -1.01 | -17.7% |
| 155th | Rwanda | -1.04 | 14.4% |
| 156th | Belarus | -1.05 | -0.8% |
| 157th | Equatorial Guinea | -1.11 | 3.2% |
| 158th | Angola | -1.12 | 0.7% |
| 159th | Côte d'Ivoire | -1.13 | -20.5% |
| 160th | Syrian Arab Republic | -1.14 | -25.5% |
| 161st | Tajikistan | -1.14 | 8.0% |
| 162nd | Chad | -1.17 | -32.3% |
| 163rd | Afghanistan | -1.18 | 25.9% |
| 164th | Uzbekistan | -1.19 | 1.7% |
| 165th | Congo, Republic of | -1.19 | 6.0% |
| 166th | Guinea-Bissau | -1.19 | -12.2% |
| 167th | Central African Republic | -1.20 | 13.4% |
| 168th | Sudan | -1.22 | -13.2% |
| 169th | Comoros | -1.23 | -60.2% |
| 170th | West Bank and Gaza | -1.23 | -18.8% |
| 171st | Togo | -1.29 | -7.8% |
| 172nd | Myanmar | -1.29 | 3.4% |
| 173rd | Sierra Leone | -1.33 | 18.3% |
| 174th | Turkmenistan | -1.42 | -2.4% |
| 175th | Liberia | -1.42 | 7.4% |
| 176th | Haiti | -1.48 | -9.1% |
| 177th | Burundi | -1.49 | 0.8% |
| 178th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | -1.71 | 6.9% |
| 179th | Iraq | -1.75 | 10.8% |
| 180th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | -1.83 | 1.8% |
| 181st | Somalia, Fed. Rep. | -1.90 | -24.3% |
FAQ
What was Mali's government effectiveness in 2003?▾
Mali's government effectiveness in 2003 was -0.72. This ranked 132nd globally.
How did Mali's government effectiveness change in 2003?▾
Mali's government effectiveness decreased by 3.7% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest government effectiveness in 2003?▾
Finland had the highest government effectiveness in 2003 at 2.19.
What is the government effectiveness of Mali in 2003?▾
The government effectiveness of Mali in 2003 was -0.72. This ranked 132nd globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Mali's government effectiveness?▾
Mali's government effectiveness went from -0.70 in 2002 to -0.72 in 2003, a 3.7% decrease.
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
Political Stability
Regulatory Quality
Rule of Law
Control of Corruption
Voice and Accountability
Peak: 2002
Lowest: 2021
Government Effectiveness 1990s
Government Effectiveness 2000s
Government Effectiveness 2010s
Government Effectiveness 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Lesotho
vs Rwanda
vs Sierra Leone
vs Syrian Arab Republic
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Government Effectiveness
African Union Government Effectiveness
Global Ranking