Belarus - Energy Use per Capita 2003
2,652
+92 from 2002
Belarus's energy use per capita was 2,652 in 2003, increased +92 from 2,561 in 2002. This was the 101st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 128 | 0.8% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 145 | 3.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 153 | 3.5% |
| 4th | Senegal | 236 | -5.6% |
| 5th | Chad | 238 | -1.2% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 247 | 4.7% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 264 | 7.9% |
| 8th | Congo, Republic of | 275 | 14.8% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 279 | 0.7% |
| 11th | Ghana | 281 | -7.4% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 297 | 4.6% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 301 | 7.4% |
| 14th | Benin | 301 | 2.3% |
| 15th | Lao PDR | 314 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 326 | 0.0% |
| 17th | Eritrea | 331 | 10.4% |
| 18th | Nepal | 339 | 1.4% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 345 | -7.8% |
| 20th | Haiti | 357 | -1.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 388 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | Rwanda | 396 | -2.8% |
| 23rd | India | 400 | 0.6% |
| 24th | Morocco | 400 | -1.7% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 411 | 1.2% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 413 | 2.1% |
| 27th | Togo | 415 | 3.0% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 421 | 2.9% |
| 29th | Kenya | 435 | -2.3% |
| 30th | Cameroon | 435 | 1.3% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 435 | 5.1% |
| 32nd | Viet Nam | 441 | 3.9% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 443 | -1.9% |
| 34th | Angola | 446 | 3.9% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 454 | 0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 465 | -2.8% |
| 37th | Zimbabwe | 477 | -8.2% |
| 38th | Sudan | 491 | -5.1% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 505 | 2.5% |
| 40th | Kyrgyz Republic | 511 | 5.3% |
| 41st | Honduras | 517 | 5.9% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 524 | 0.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 597 | -1.5% |
| 44th | Zambia | 611 | 1.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 619 | 2.8% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 622 | 6.9% |
| 47th | Armenia | 623 | 6.2% |
| 48th | Colombia | 638 | 0.7% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 648 | 1.7% |
| 50th | Albania | 649 | -1.8% |
| 51st | Georgia | 685 | 7.1% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 690 | -0.2% |
| 53rd | Paraguay | 747 | 0.9% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 770 | 8.6% |
| 55th | Panama | 774 | -2.1% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 775 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 784 | -11.1% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 788 | 5.2% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 797 | 1.7% |
| 60th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 831 | 1.7% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 878 | -2.0% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 901 | 0.0% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 909 | 4.1% |
| 64th | Syrian Arab Republic | 925 | -1.9% |
| 65th | Iraq | 940 | -14.0% |
| 66th | Algeria | 956 | 4.9% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 988 | -3.6% |
| 68th | Suriname | 1,004 | 4.2% |
| 69th | Cuba | 1,029 | -0.8% |
| 70th | Botswana | 1,036 | -2.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,053 | 0.1% |
| 72nd | Kosovo | 1,091 | 5.5% |
| 73rd | China | 1,105 | 13.2% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,108 | 0.4% |
| 75th | Lebanon | 1,157 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Moldova | 1,158 | 8.8% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,160 | 4.8% |
| 78th | Jamaica | 1,339 | 3.7% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,379 | 10.2% |
| 80th | Thailand | 1,379 | 7.2% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,477 | 4.4% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,591 | 7.2% |
| 83rd | Chile | 1,612 | 0.0% |
| 84th | Gabon | 1,621 | 14.4% |
| 85th | Mexico | 1,644 | 5.6% |
| 86th | Uzbekistan | 1,824 | -4.4% |
| 87th | Romania | 1,842 | 4.9% |
| 88th | Latvia | 1,890 | 7.2% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,027 | 4.8% |
| 90th | Malta | 2,071 | 11.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,075 | 2.2% |
| 92nd | Serbia | 2,211 | 5.4% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,229 | 7.1% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,254 | 4.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,301 | 11.0% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,345 | 6.9% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,375 | 2.7% |
| 98th | Portugal | 2,401 | -3.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,490 | 3.3% |
| 100th | Hungary | 2,580 | 2.4% |
| 101st | Belarus | 2,652 | 3.6% |
| 102nd | Greece | 2,673 | 2.7% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,714 | 5.3% |
| 104th | Kazakhstan | 2,737 | 7.8% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,914 | 4.6% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,949 | 3.0% |
| 107th | Turkmenistan | 3,005 | 35.7% |
| 108th | Libya | 3,033 | -1.8% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,145 | 1.6% |
| 110th | Italy | 3,164 | 4.2% |
| 111th | Slovak Republic | 3,469 | -0.4% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,516 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Switzerland | 3,525 | -0.4% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,540 | 1.6% |
| 115th | Oman | 3,565 | 2.8% |
| 116th | European Union | 3,580 | 2.0% |
| 117th | Estonia | 3,680 | 9.0% |
| 118th | Denmark | 3,729 | 5.5% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,764 | 1.3% |
| 120th | Japan | 3,957 | -0.9% |
| 121st | Austria | 3,957 | 4.9% |
| 122nd | Germany | 4,096 | -0.3% |
| 123rd | Korea | 4,138 | 1.1% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,181 | -3.4% |
| 125th | France | 4,297 | 1.8% |
| 126th | Czechia | 4,387 | 4.4% |
| 127th | Russian Federation | 4,462 | 4.0% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,769 | -0.1% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,959 | 3.2% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,609 | 3.9% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,616 | 2.5% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,677 | -2.6% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,935 | 7.9% |
| 134th | Singapore | 6,217 | 22.7% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,632 | -2.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 7,072 | 5.2% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,228 | 13.9% |
| 138th | United States | 7,791 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Canada | 8,303 | 4.5% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,553 | 4.2% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 10,078 | 12.1% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 10,102 | -7.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 10,160 | 4.6% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,093 | -0.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 11,895 | -2.6% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,429 | -6.6% |
| 147th | Qatar | 18,984 | -1.1% |
FAQ
What was Belarus's energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita in 2003 was 2,652. This ranked 101st globally.
How did Belarus's energy use per capita change in 2003?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita increased by 3.6% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2003 at 18,984.
What is the energy use per capita of Belarus in 2003?▾
The energy use per capita of Belarus in 2003 was 2,652. This ranked 101st globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Belarus's energy use per capita?▾
Belarus's energy use per capita went from 2,561 in 2002 to 2,652 in 2003, a 3.6% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Belarus matched the Fiscal Dominance Trap pattern in 2003. Historically: 386 occurrences, 278 successful (72%). Outcome 24 months later: 10.3%. View full analysis →
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1990
Lowest: 1999
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Gabon
vs Cuba
vs Peru
vs Bosnia and Herzegovina
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking