Sudan - Energy Use per Capita 2003
491
−26 from 2002
Sudan's energy use per capita was 491 in 2003, decreased +26 from 518 in 2002. This was the 38th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 128 | 0.8% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 145 | 3.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 153 | 3.5% |
| 4th | Senegal | 236 | -5.6% |
| 5th | Chad | 238 | -1.2% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 247 | 4.7% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 264 | 7.9% |
| 8th | Congo, Republic of | 275 | 14.8% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 279 | 0.7% |
| 11th | Ghana | 281 | -7.4% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 297 | 4.6% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 301 | 7.4% |
| 14th | Benin | 301 | 2.3% |
| 15th | Lao PDR | 314 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 326 | 0.0% |
| 17th | Eritrea | 331 | 10.4% |
| 18th | Nepal | 339 | 1.4% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 345 | -7.8% |
| 20th | Haiti | 357 | -1.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 388 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | Rwanda | 396 | -2.8% |
| 23rd | India | 400 | 0.6% |
| 24th | Morocco | 400 | -1.7% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 411 | 1.2% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 413 | 2.1% |
| 27th | Togo | 415 | 3.0% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 421 | 2.9% |
| 29th | Kenya | 435 | -2.3% |
| 30th | Cameroon | 435 | 1.3% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 435 | 5.1% |
| 32nd | Viet Nam | 441 | 3.9% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 443 | -1.9% |
| 34th | Angola | 446 | 3.9% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 454 | 0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 465 | -2.8% |
| 37th | Zimbabwe | 477 | -8.2% |
| 38th | Sudan | 491 | -5.1% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 505 | 2.5% |
| 40th | Kyrgyz Republic | 511 | 5.3% |
| 41st | Honduras | 517 | 5.9% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 524 | 0.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 597 | -1.5% |
| 44th | Zambia | 611 | 1.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 619 | 2.8% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 622 | 6.9% |
| 47th | Armenia | 623 | 6.2% |
| 48th | Colombia | 638 | 0.7% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 648 | 1.7% |
| 50th | Albania | 649 | -1.8% |
| 51st | Georgia | 685 | 7.1% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 690 | -0.2% |
| 53rd | Paraguay | 747 | 0.9% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 770 | 8.6% |
| 55th | Panama | 774 | -2.1% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 775 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 784 | -11.1% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 788 | 5.2% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 797 | 1.7% |
| 60th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 831 | 1.7% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 878 | -2.0% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 901 | 0.0% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 909 | 4.1% |
| 64th | Syrian Arab Republic | 925 | -1.9% |
| 65th | Iraq | 940 | -14.0% |
| 66th | Algeria | 956 | 4.9% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 988 | -3.6% |
| 68th | Suriname | 1,004 | 4.2% |
| 69th | Cuba | 1,029 | -0.8% |
| 70th | Botswana | 1,036 | -2.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,053 | 0.1% |
| 72nd | Kosovo | 1,091 | 5.5% |
| 73rd | China | 1,105 | 13.2% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,108 | 0.4% |
| 75th | Lebanon | 1,157 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Moldova | 1,158 | 8.8% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,160 | 4.8% |
| 78th | Jamaica | 1,339 | 3.7% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,379 | 10.2% |
| 80th | Thailand | 1,379 | 7.2% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,477 | 4.4% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,591 | 7.2% |
| 83rd | Chile | 1,612 | 0.0% |
| 84th | Gabon | 1,621 | 14.4% |
| 85th | Mexico | 1,644 | 5.6% |
| 86th | Uzbekistan | 1,824 | -4.4% |
| 87th | Romania | 1,842 | 4.9% |
| 88th | Latvia | 1,890 | 7.2% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,027 | 4.8% |
| 90th | Malta | 2,071 | 11.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,075 | 2.2% |
| 92nd | Serbia | 2,211 | 5.4% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,229 | 7.1% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,254 | 4.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,301 | 11.0% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,345 | 6.9% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,375 | 2.7% |
| 98th | Portugal | 2,401 | -3.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,490 | 3.3% |
| 100th | Hungary | 2,580 | 2.4% |
| 101st | Belarus | 2,652 | 3.6% |
| 102nd | Greece | 2,673 | 2.7% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,714 | 5.3% |
| 104th | Kazakhstan | 2,737 | 7.8% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,914 | 4.6% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,949 | 3.0% |
| 107th | Turkmenistan | 3,005 | 35.7% |
| 108th | Libya | 3,033 | -1.8% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,145 | 1.6% |
| 110th | Italy | 3,164 | 4.2% |
| 111th | Slovak Republic | 3,469 | -0.4% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,516 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Switzerland | 3,525 | -0.4% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,540 | 1.6% |
| 115th | Oman | 3,565 | 2.8% |
| 116th | European Union | 3,580 | 2.0% |
| 117th | Estonia | 3,680 | 9.0% |
| 118th | Denmark | 3,729 | 5.5% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,764 | 1.3% |
| 120th | Japan | 3,957 | -0.9% |
| 121st | Austria | 3,957 | 4.9% |
| 122nd | Germany | 4,096 | -0.3% |
| 123rd | Korea | 4,138 | 1.1% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,181 | -3.4% |
| 125th | France | 4,297 | 1.8% |
| 126th | Czechia | 4,387 | 4.4% |
| 127th | Russian Federation | 4,462 | 4.0% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,769 | -0.1% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,959 | 3.2% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,609 | 3.9% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,616 | 2.5% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,677 | -2.6% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,935 | 7.9% |
| 134th | Singapore | 6,217 | 22.7% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,632 | -2.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 7,072 | 5.2% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,228 | 13.9% |
| 138th | United States | 7,791 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Canada | 8,303 | 4.5% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,553 | 4.2% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 10,078 | 12.1% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 10,102 | -7.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 10,160 | 4.6% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,093 | -0.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 11,895 | -2.6% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,429 | -6.6% |
| 147th | Qatar | 18,984 | -1.1% |
FAQ
What was Sudan's energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Sudan's energy use per capita in 2003 was 491. This ranked 38th globally.
How did Sudan's energy use per capita change in 2003?▾
Sudan's energy use per capita decreased by 5.1% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2003 at 18,984.
What is the energy use per capita of Sudan in 2003?▾
The energy use per capita of Sudan in 2003 was 491. This ranked 38th globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Sudan's energy use per capita?▾
Sudan's energy use per capita went from 518 in 2002 to 491 in 2003, a 5.1% decrease.
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1999
Lowest: 2012
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Mozambique
vs Somalia, Fed. Rep.
vs Congo, Democratic Republic of
vs Niger
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Energy Use per Capita
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking