Suriname - Energy Use per Capita 2003
1,004
+41 from 2002
Suriname's energy use per capita was 1,004 in 2003, increased +41 from 963 in 2002. This was the 68th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 128 | 0.8% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 145 | 3.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 153 | 3.5% |
| 4th | Senegal | 236 | -5.6% |
| 5th | Chad | 238 | -1.2% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 247 | 4.7% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 264 | 7.9% |
| 8th | Congo, Republic of | 275 | 14.8% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 279 | 0.7% |
| 11th | Ghana | 281 | -7.4% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 297 | 4.6% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 301 | 7.4% |
| 14th | Benin | 301 | 2.3% |
| 15th | Lao PDR | 314 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 326 | 0.0% |
| 17th | Eritrea | 331 | 10.4% |
| 18th | Nepal | 339 | 1.4% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 345 | -7.8% |
| 20th | Haiti | 357 | -1.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 388 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | Rwanda | 396 | -2.8% |
| 23rd | India | 400 | 0.6% |
| 24th | Morocco | 400 | -1.7% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 411 | 1.2% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 413 | 2.1% |
| 27th | Togo | 415 | 3.0% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 421 | 2.9% |
| 29th | Kenya | 435 | -2.3% |
| 30th | Cameroon | 435 | 1.3% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 435 | 5.1% |
| 32nd | Viet Nam | 441 | 3.9% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 443 | -1.9% |
| 34th | Angola | 446 | 3.9% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 454 | 0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 465 | -2.8% |
| 37th | Zimbabwe | 477 | -8.2% |
| 38th | Sudan | 491 | -5.1% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 505 | 2.5% |
| 40th | Kyrgyz Republic | 511 | 5.3% |
| 41st | Honduras | 517 | 5.9% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 524 | 0.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 597 | -1.5% |
| 44th | Zambia | 611 | 1.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 619 | 2.8% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 622 | 6.9% |
| 47th | Armenia | 623 | 6.2% |
| 48th | Colombia | 638 | 0.7% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 648 | 1.7% |
| 50th | Albania | 649 | -1.8% |
| 51st | Georgia | 685 | 7.1% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 690 | -0.2% |
| 53rd | Paraguay | 747 | 0.9% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 770 | 8.6% |
| 55th | Panama | 774 | -2.1% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 775 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 784 | -11.1% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 788 | 5.2% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 797 | 1.7% |
| 60th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 831 | 1.7% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 878 | -2.0% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 901 | 0.0% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 909 | 4.1% |
| 64th | Syrian Arab Republic | 925 | -1.9% |
| 65th | Iraq | 940 | -14.0% |
| 66th | Algeria | 956 | 4.9% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 988 | -3.6% |
| 68th | Suriname | 1,004 | 4.2% |
| 69th | Cuba | 1,029 | -0.8% |
| 70th | Botswana | 1,036 | -2.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,053 | 0.1% |
| 72nd | Kosovo | 1,091 | 5.5% |
| 73rd | China | 1,105 | 13.2% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,108 | 0.4% |
| 75th | Lebanon | 1,157 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Moldova | 1,158 | 8.8% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,160 | 4.8% |
| 78th | Jamaica | 1,339 | 3.7% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,379 | 10.2% |
| 80th | Thailand | 1,379 | 7.2% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,477 | 4.4% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,591 | 7.2% |
| 83rd | Chile | 1,612 | 0.0% |
| 84th | Gabon | 1,621 | 14.4% |
| 85th | Mexico | 1,644 | 5.6% |
| 86th | Uzbekistan | 1,824 | -4.4% |
| 87th | Romania | 1,842 | 4.9% |
| 88th | Latvia | 1,890 | 7.2% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,027 | 4.8% |
| 90th | Malta | 2,071 | 11.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,075 | 2.2% |
| 92nd | Serbia | 2,211 | 5.4% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,229 | 7.1% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,254 | 4.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,301 | 11.0% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,345 | 6.9% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,375 | 2.7% |
| 98th | Portugal | 2,401 | -3.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,490 | 3.3% |
| 100th | Hungary | 2,580 | 2.4% |
| 101st | Belarus | 2,652 | 3.6% |
| 102nd | Greece | 2,673 | 2.7% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,714 | 5.3% |
| 104th | Kazakhstan | 2,737 | 7.8% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,914 | 4.6% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,949 | 3.0% |
| 107th | Turkmenistan | 3,005 | 35.7% |
| 108th | Libya | 3,033 | -1.8% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,145 | 1.6% |
| 110th | Italy | 3,164 | 4.2% |
| 111th | Slovak Republic | 3,469 | -0.4% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,516 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Switzerland | 3,525 | -0.4% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,540 | 1.6% |
| 115th | Oman | 3,565 | 2.8% |
| 116th | European Union | 3,580 | 2.0% |
| 117th | Estonia | 3,680 | 9.0% |
| 118th | Denmark | 3,729 | 5.5% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,764 | 1.3% |
| 120th | Japan | 3,957 | -0.9% |
| 121st | Austria | 3,957 | 4.9% |
| 122nd | Germany | 4,096 | -0.3% |
| 123rd | Korea | 4,138 | 1.1% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,181 | -3.4% |
| 125th | France | 4,297 | 1.8% |
| 126th | Czechia | 4,387 | 4.4% |
| 127th | Russian Federation | 4,462 | 4.0% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,769 | -0.1% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,959 | 3.2% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,609 | 3.9% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,616 | 2.5% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,677 | -2.6% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,935 | 7.9% |
| 134th | Singapore | 6,217 | 22.7% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,632 | -2.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 7,072 | 5.2% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,228 | 13.9% |
| 138th | United States | 7,791 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Canada | 8,303 | 4.5% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,553 | 4.2% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 10,078 | 12.1% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 10,102 | -7.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 10,160 | 4.6% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,093 | -0.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 11,895 | -2.6% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,429 | -6.6% |
| 147th | Qatar | 18,984 | -1.1% |
FAQ
What was Suriname's energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita in 2003 was 1,004. This ranked 68th globally.
How did Suriname's energy use per capita change in 2003?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita increased by 4.2% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2003 at 18,984.
What is the energy use per capita of Suriname in 2003?▾
The energy use per capita of Suriname in 2003 was 1,004. This ranked 68th globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Suriname's energy use per capita?▾
Suriname's energy use per capita went from 963 in 2002 to 1,004 in 2003, a 4.2% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Suriname matched the Orthodox Tightening Cycle pattern in 2003. Historically: 311 occurrences, 177 successful (57%). Outcome 24 months later: 9.9%. View full analysis →
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2014
Lowest: 2002
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Fiji
vs Libya
vs Paraguay
vs Botswana
Organisation of Islamic Cooperation Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking