Hong Kong SAR, China - Energy Use per Capita 2003
2,027
+93 from 2002
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita was 2,027 in 2003, increased +93 from 1,934 in 2002. This was the 89th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2003▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Niger | 128 | 0.8% |
| 2nd | Burkina Faso | 145 | 3.6% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 153 | 3.5% |
| 4th | Senegal | 236 | -5.6% |
| 5th | Chad | 238 | -1.2% |
| 6th | Madagascar | 247 | 4.7% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 264 | 7.9% |
| 8th | Congo, Republic of | 275 | 14.8% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 276 | 1.3% |
| 10th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 279 | 0.7% |
| 11th | Ghana | 281 | -7.4% |
| 12th | Nigeria | 297 | 4.6% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 301 | 7.4% |
| 14th | Benin | 301 | 2.3% |
| 15th | Lao PDR | 314 | 1.6% |
| 16th | Tajikistan | 326 | 0.0% |
| 17th | Eritrea | 331 | 10.4% |
| 18th | Nepal | 339 | 1.4% |
| 19th | Côte d'Ivoire | 345 | -7.8% |
| 20th | Haiti | 357 | -1.2% |
| 21st | Uganda | 388 | 0.3% |
| 22nd | Rwanda | 396 | -2.8% |
| 23rd | India | 400 | 0.6% |
| 24th | Morocco | 400 | -1.7% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 411 | 1.2% |
| 26th | Pakistan | 413 | 2.1% |
| 27th | Togo | 415 | 3.0% |
| 28th | Mozambique | 421 | 2.9% |
| 29th | Kenya | 435 | -2.3% |
| 30th | Cameroon | 435 | 1.3% |
| 31st | Sri Lanka | 435 | 5.1% |
| 32nd | Viet Nam | 441 | 3.9% |
| 33rd | Philippines | 443 | -1.9% |
| 34th | Angola | 446 | 3.9% |
| 35th | Equatorial Guinea | 454 | 0.6% |
| 36th | Peru | 465 | -2.8% |
| 37th | Zimbabwe | 477 | -8.2% |
| 38th | Sudan | 491 | -5.1% |
| 39th | Nicaragua | 505 | 2.5% |
| 40th | Kyrgyz Republic | 511 | 5.3% |
| 41st | Honduras | 517 | 5.9% |
| 42nd | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 524 | 0.8% |
| 43rd | Indonesia | 597 | -1.5% |
| 44th | Zambia | 611 | 1.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 619 | 2.8% |
| 46th | El Salvador | 622 | 6.9% |
| 47th | Armenia | 623 | 6.2% |
| 48th | Colombia | 638 | 0.7% |
| 49th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 648 | 1.7% |
| 50th | Albania | 649 | -1.8% |
| 51st | Georgia | 685 | 7.1% |
| 52nd | Guatemala | 690 | -0.2% |
| 53rd | Paraguay | 747 | 0.9% |
| 54th | Ecuador | 770 | 8.6% |
| 55th | Panama | 774 | -2.1% |
| 56th | Uruguay | 775 | 0.4% |
| 57th | Dominican Republic | 784 | -11.1% |
| 58th | Costa Rica | 788 | 5.2% |
| 59th | Tunisia | 797 | 1.7% |
| 60th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 831 | 1.7% |
| 61st | Eswatini | 878 | -2.0% |
| 62nd | Jordan | 901 | 0.0% |
| 63rd | Mauritius | 909 | 4.1% |
| 64th | Syrian Arab Republic | 925 | -1.9% |
| 65th | Iraq | 940 | -14.0% |
| 66th | Algeria | 956 | 4.9% |
| 67th | Mongolia | 988 | -3.6% |
| 68th | Suriname | 1,004 | 4.2% |
| 69th | Cuba | 1,029 | -0.8% |
| 70th | Botswana | 1,036 | -2.1% |
| 71st | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,053 | 0.1% |
| 72nd | Kosovo | 1,091 | 5.5% |
| 73rd | China | 1,105 | 13.2% |
| 74th | Brazil | 1,108 | 0.4% |
| 75th | Lebanon | 1,157 | -1.5% |
| 76th | Moldova | 1,158 | 8.8% |
| 77th | Türkiye | 1,160 | 4.8% |
| 78th | Jamaica | 1,339 | 3.7% |
| 79th | North Macedonia | 1,379 | 10.2% |
| 80th | Thailand | 1,379 | 7.2% |
| 81st | Azerbaijan | 1,477 | 4.4% |
| 82nd | Argentina | 1,591 | 7.2% |
| 83rd | Chile | 1,612 | 0.0% |
| 84th | Gabon | 1,621 | 14.4% |
| 85th | Mexico | 1,644 | 5.6% |
| 86th | Uzbekistan | 1,824 | -4.4% |
| 87th | Romania | 1,842 | 4.9% |
| 88th | Latvia | 1,890 | 7.2% |
| 89th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,027 | 4.8% |
| 90th | Malta | 2,071 | 11.9% |
| 91st | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2,075 | 2.2% |
| 92nd | Serbia | 2,211 | 5.4% |
| 93rd | Croatia | 2,229 | 7.1% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,254 | 4.6% |
| 95th | South Africa | 2,301 | 11.0% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,345 | 6.9% |
| 97th | Poland | 2,375 | 2.7% |
| 98th | Portugal | 2,401 | -3.1% |
| 99th | Bulgaria | 2,490 | 3.3% |
| 100th | Hungary | 2,580 | 2.4% |
| 101st | Belarus | 2,652 | 3.6% |
| 102nd | Greece | 2,673 | 2.7% |
| 103rd | Lithuania | 2,714 | 5.3% |
| 104th | Kazakhstan | 2,737 | 7.8% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,914 | 4.6% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,949 | 3.0% |
| 107th | Turkmenistan | 3,005 | 35.7% |
| 108th | Libya | 3,033 | -1.8% |
| 109th | Spain | 3,145 | 1.6% |
| 110th | Italy | 3,164 | 4.2% |
| 111th | Slovak Republic | 3,469 | -0.4% |
| 112th | Ireland | 3,516 | -4.0% |
| 113th | Switzerland | 3,525 | -0.4% |
| 114th | Slovenia | 3,540 | 1.6% |
| 115th | Oman | 3,565 | 2.8% |
| 116th | European Union | 3,580 | 2.0% |
| 117th | Estonia | 3,680 | 9.0% |
| 118th | Denmark | 3,729 | 5.5% |
| 119th | United Kingdom | 3,764 | 1.3% |
| 120th | Japan | 3,957 | -0.9% |
| 121st | Austria | 3,957 | 4.9% |
| 122nd | Germany | 4,096 | -0.3% |
| 123rd | Korea | 4,138 | 1.1% |
| 124th | New Zealand | 4,181 | -3.4% |
| 125th | France | 4,297 | 1.8% |
| 126th | Czechia | 4,387 | 4.4% |
| 127th | Russian Federation | 4,462 | 4.0% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,769 | -0.1% |
| 129th | Netherlands | 4,959 | 3.2% |
| 130th | Belgium | 5,609 | 3.9% |
| 131st | Australia | 5,616 | 2.5% |
| 132nd | Sweden | 5,677 | -2.6% |
| 133rd | Norway | 5,935 | 7.9% |
| 134th | Singapore | 6,217 | 22.7% |
| 135th | Saudi Arabia | 6,632 | -2.9% |
| 136th | Finland | 7,072 | 5.2% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,228 | 13.9% |
| 138th | United States | 7,791 | -0.6% |
| 139th | Canada | 8,303 | 4.5% |
| 140th | Luxembourg | 8,553 | 4.2% |
| 141st | Trinidad and Tobago | 10,078 | 12.1% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 10,102 | -7.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 10,160 | 4.6% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,093 | -0.7% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 11,895 | -2.6% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,429 | -6.6% |
| 147th | Qatar | 18,984 | -1.1% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2003 was 2,027. This ranked 89th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita change in 2003?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita increased by 4.8% in 2003 compared to 2002.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2003?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2003 at 18,984.
What is the energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2003?▾
The energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2003 was 2,027. This ranked 89th globally.
How does 2003 compare to 2002 for Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita went from 1,934 in 2002 to 2,027 in 2003, a 4.8% increase.
Related
2002
2004
All years
Full ranking 2003
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1999
Lowest: 2025
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking