Botswana - Energy Use per Capita 2000
1,070
+19 from 1999
Botswana's energy use per capita was 1,070 in 2000, increased +19 from 1,052 in 1999. This was the 71st highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Burkina Faso | 123 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Niger | 128 | -37.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 136 | 0.8% |
| 4th | Congo, Republic of | 226 | -4.3% |
| 5th | Senegal | 241 | 3.8% |
| 6th | Chad | 242 | -2.6% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 242 | 2.9% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 256 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 273 | 0.6% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 274 | 0.6% |
| 11th | Benin | 275 | -16.3% |
| 12th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 275 | -2.9% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 284 | 2.0% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 297 | - |
| 15th | Eritrea | 315 | -0.6% |
| 16th | Ghana | 322 | -19.7% |
| 17th | Nepal | 330 | 3.8% |
| 18th | Tajikistan | 342 | -5.2% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 343 | 15.2% |
| 20th | Haiti | 368 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Viet Nam | 372 | 4.0% |
| 22nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 384 | -6.0% |
| 23rd | Uganda | 387 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Morocco | 388 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 394 | 2.7% |
| 26th | India | 395 | 0.5% |
| 27th | Mozambique | 396 | 3.2% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | -21.1% |
| 29th | Togo | 411 | -2.9% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 412 | 0.2% |
| 31st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 424 | -20.9% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 426 | 1.5% |
| 33rd | Angola | 428 | -1.4% |
| 34th | Sri Lanka | 432 | 8.1% |
| 35th | Honduras | 456 | -3.0% |
| 36th | Kenya | 460 | 0.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 473 | -5.0% |
| 38th | Sudan | 487 | -6.0% |
| 39th | Philippines | 487 | 0.9% |
| 40th | Nicaragua | 500 | 1.0% |
| 41st | Peru | 506 | -1.3% |
| 42nd | El Salvador | 537 | -16.2% |
| 43rd | Zimbabwe | 556 | -38.1% |
| 44th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 570 | -7.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 576 | -1.0% |
| 46th | Albania | 581 | 0.8% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 586 | -0.2% |
| 48th | Zambia | 596 | -5.3% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 616 | 2.5% |
| 50th | Armenia | 626 | 8.0% |
| 51st | Ecuador | 639 | 0.1% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 668 | -1.3% |
| 53rd | Georgia | 704 | 5.1% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 730 | 7.2% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 748 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Paraguay | 757 | -8.2% |
| 57th | Panama | 791 | -7.4% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 833 | 6.3% |
| 59th | Mauritius | 851 | 9.7% |
| 60th | Dominican Republic | 856 | 7.4% |
| 61st | Kosovo | 857 | - |
| 62nd | Algeria | 874 | 0.2% |
| 63rd | China | 898 | 2.0% |
| 64th | Jordan | 903 | 2.5% |
| 65th | Eswatini | 914 | -5.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 928 | -2.1% |
| 67th | Uruguay | 949 | -4.7% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 979 | 5.0% |
| 69th | Moldova | 986 | -7.3% |
| 70th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,045 | 30.2% |
| 71st | Botswana | 1,070 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Brazil | 1,081 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Iraq | 1,091 | 13.7% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,137 | -10.7% |
| 75th | Cuba | 1,147 | 6.8% |
| 76th | Thailand | 1,153 | 1.2% |
| 77th | Gabon | 1,153 | -2.1% |
| 78th | Türkiye | 1,166 | 8.0% |
| 79th | Suriname | 1,280 | - |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 1,317 | -2.0% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,339 | 2.3% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,404 | 2.5% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,541 | -0.9% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,615 | 0.1% |
| 85th | Latvia | 1,619 | -2.7% |
| 86th | Chile | 1,623 | -0.6% |
| 87th | Argentina | 1,643 | -1.4% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,732 | -10.9% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,801 | 8.7% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,852 | -4.0% |
| 91st | Uzbekistan | 1,867 | 1.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 1,883 | -2.7% |
| 93rd | Lithuania | 2,041 | -9.8% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,102 | 11.6% |
| 95th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,121 | -11.3% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,265 | 5.7% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,269 | -4.1% |
| 98th | Bulgaria | 2,277 | 2.1% |
| 99th | Kazakhstan | 2,302 | -1.0% |
| 100th | Poland | 2,322 | -3.1% |
| 101st | Portugal | 2,390 | 0.0% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,448 | -1.7% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,472 | 2.1% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,512 | 5.0% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,700 | -0.1% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,899 | 5.9% |
| 107th | Libya | 2,977 | 4.3% |
| 108th | Spain | 2,991 | 3.9% |
| 109th | Italy | 3,012 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Turkmenistan | 3,248 | -1.7% |
| 111th | Slovenia | 3,281 | 1.2% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,286 | 5.1% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,293 | 0.6% |
| 114th | Estonia | 3,378 | -4.7% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,427 | 0.5% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,467 | -1.9% |
| 117th | Denmark | 3,491 | -3.1% |
| 118th | Austria | 3,571 | -0.6% |
| 119th | Ireland | 3,627 | 2.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.1% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,952 | 7.8% |
| 122nd | Czechia | 4,022 | 5.6% |
| 123rd | Japan | 4,067 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,094 | 0.3% |
| 125th | France | 4,130 | 0.3% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,225 | 2.1% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,467 | 3.2% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,613 | 4.8% |
| 129th | Singapore | 4,635 | 1.0% |
| 130th | Netherlands | 4,695 | 0.2% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,376 | -5.3% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,663 | 0.9% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,681 | 0.6% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,826 | -1.5% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,257 | -0.4% |
| 136th | Saudi Arabia | 6,516 | 7.6% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,307 | -1.6% |
| 138th | Trinidad and Tobago | 7,576 | 7.2% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,682 | 5.7% |
| 140th | United States | 8,055 | 1.7% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,225 | 1.3% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,957 | -9.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 9,494 | 1.0% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,405 | 10.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,833 | 2.0% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,737 | 7.0% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,939 | -8.4% |
FAQ
What was Botswana's energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Botswana's energy use per capita in 2000 was 1,070. This ranked 71st globally.
How did Botswana's energy use per capita change in 2000?▾
Botswana's energy use per capita increased by 1.8% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2000 at 16,939.
What is the energy use per capita of Botswana in 2000?▾
The energy use per capita of Botswana in 2000 was 1,070. This ranked 71st globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Botswana's energy use per capita?▾
Botswana's energy use per capita went from 1,052 in 1999 to 1,070 in 2000, a 1.8% increase.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Botswana matched the Stagflation Risk pattern in 2000. Historically: 307 occurrences, 117 successful (38%). Outcome 24 months later: 8.0%. View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2018
Lowest: 1996
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Mongolia
vs Libya
vs Kosovo
vs Suriname
African Union Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking