Colombia - Energy Use per Capita 2000
668
−8 from 1999
Colombia's energy use per capita was 668 in 2000, decreased +8 from 676 in 1999. This was the 52nd highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Burkina Faso | 123 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Niger | 128 | -37.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 136 | 0.8% |
| 4th | Congo, Republic of | 226 | -4.3% |
| 5th | Senegal | 241 | 3.8% |
| 6th | Chad | 242 | -2.6% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 242 | 2.9% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 256 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 273 | 0.6% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 274 | 0.6% |
| 11th | Benin | 275 | -16.3% |
| 12th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 275 | -2.9% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 284 | 2.0% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 297 | - |
| 15th | Eritrea | 315 | -0.6% |
| 16th | Ghana | 322 | -19.7% |
| 17th | Nepal | 330 | 3.8% |
| 18th | Tajikistan | 342 | -5.2% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 343 | 15.2% |
| 20th | Haiti | 368 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Viet Nam | 372 | 4.0% |
| 22nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 384 | -6.0% |
| 23rd | Uganda | 387 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Morocco | 388 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 394 | 2.7% |
| 26th | India | 395 | 0.5% |
| 27th | Mozambique | 396 | 3.2% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | -21.1% |
| 29th | Togo | 411 | -2.9% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 412 | 0.2% |
| 31st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 424 | -20.9% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 426 | 1.5% |
| 33rd | Angola | 428 | -1.4% |
| 34th | Sri Lanka | 432 | 8.1% |
| 35th | Honduras | 456 | -3.0% |
| 36th | Kenya | 460 | 0.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 473 | -5.0% |
| 38th | Sudan | 487 | -6.0% |
| 39th | Philippines | 487 | 0.9% |
| 40th | Nicaragua | 500 | 1.0% |
| 41st | Peru | 506 | -1.3% |
| 42nd | El Salvador | 537 | -16.2% |
| 43rd | Zimbabwe | 556 | -38.1% |
| 44th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 570 | -7.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 576 | -1.0% |
| 46th | Albania | 581 | 0.8% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 586 | -0.2% |
| 48th | Zambia | 596 | -5.3% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 616 | 2.5% |
| 50th | Armenia | 626 | 8.0% |
| 51st | Ecuador | 639 | 0.1% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 668 | -1.3% |
| 53rd | Georgia | 704 | 5.1% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 730 | 7.2% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 748 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Paraguay | 757 | -8.2% |
| 57th | Panama | 791 | -7.4% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 833 | 6.3% |
| 59th | Mauritius | 851 | 9.7% |
| 60th | Dominican Republic | 856 | 7.4% |
| 61st | Kosovo | 857 | - |
| 62nd | Algeria | 874 | 0.2% |
| 63rd | China | 898 | 2.0% |
| 64th | Jordan | 903 | 2.5% |
| 65th | Eswatini | 914 | -5.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 928 | -2.1% |
| 67th | Uruguay | 949 | -4.7% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 979 | 5.0% |
| 69th | Moldova | 986 | -7.3% |
| 70th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,045 | 30.2% |
| 71st | Botswana | 1,070 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Brazil | 1,081 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Iraq | 1,091 | 13.7% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,137 | -10.7% |
| 75th | Cuba | 1,147 | 6.8% |
| 76th | Thailand | 1,153 | 1.2% |
| 77th | Gabon | 1,153 | -2.1% |
| 78th | Türkiye | 1,166 | 8.0% |
| 79th | Suriname | 1,280 | - |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 1,317 | -2.0% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,339 | 2.3% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,404 | 2.5% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,541 | -0.9% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,615 | 0.1% |
| 85th | Latvia | 1,619 | -2.7% |
| 86th | Chile | 1,623 | -0.6% |
| 87th | Argentina | 1,643 | -1.4% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,732 | -10.9% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,801 | 8.7% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,852 | -4.0% |
| 91st | Uzbekistan | 1,867 | 1.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 1,883 | -2.7% |
| 93rd | Lithuania | 2,041 | -9.8% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,102 | 11.6% |
| 95th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,121 | -11.3% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,265 | 5.7% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,269 | -4.1% |
| 98th | Bulgaria | 2,277 | 2.1% |
| 99th | Kazakhstan | 2,302 | -1.0% |
| 100th | Poland | 2,322 | -3.1% |
| 101st | Portugal | 2,390 | 0.0% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,448 | -1.7% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,472 | 2.1% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,512 | 5.0% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,700 | -0.1% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,899 | 5.9% |
| 107th | Libya | 2,977 | 4.3% |
| 108th | Spain | 2,991 | 3.9% |
| 109th | Italy | 3,012 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Turkmenistan | 3,248 | -1.7% |
| 111th | Slovenia | 3,281 | 1.2% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,286 | 5.1% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,293 | 0.6% |
| 114th | Estonia | 3,378 | -4.7% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,427 | 0.5% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,467 | -1.9% |
| 117th | Denmark | 3,491 | -3.1% |
| 118th | Austria | 3,571 | -0.6% |
| 119th | Ireland | 3,627 | 2.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.1% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,952 | 7.8% |
| 122nd | Czechia | 4,022 | 5.6% |
| 123rd | Japan | 4,067 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,094 | 0.3% |
| 125th | France | 4,130 | 0.3% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,225 | 2.1% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,467 | 3.2% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,613 | 4.8% |
| 129th | Singapore | 4,635 | 1.0% |
| 130th | Netherlands | 4,695 | 0.2% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,376 | -5.3% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,663 | 0.9% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,681 | 0.6% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,826 | -1.5% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,257 | -0.4% |
| 136th | Saudi Arabia | 6,516 | 7.6% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,307 | -1.6% |
| 138th | Trinidad and Tobago | 7,576 | 7.2% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,682 | 5.7% |
| 140th | United States | 8,055 | 1.7% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,225 | 1.3% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,957 | -9.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 9,494 | 1.0% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,405 | 10.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,833 | 2.0% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,737 | 7.0% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,939 | -8.4% |
FAQ
What was Colombia's energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Colombia's energy use per capita in 2000 was 668. This ranked 52nd globally.
How did Colombia's energy use per capita change in 2000?▾
Colombia's energy use per capita decreased by 1.3% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2000 at 16,939.
What is the energy use per capita of Colombia in 2000?▾
The energy use per capita of Colombia in 2000 was 668. This ranked 52nd globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Colombia's energy use per capita?▾
Colombia's energy use per capita went from 676 in 1999 to 668 in 2000, a 1.3% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Colombia matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2000. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). Outcome 24 months later: 2.5%. View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 2016
Lowest: 2004
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs Moldova
vs Equatorial Guinea
vs Marshall Islands
vs Jamaica
OECD Energy Use per Capita
Global Ranking