Hong Kong SAR, China - Energy Use per Capita 2000
2,121
−271 from 1999
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita was 2,121 in 2000, decreased +271 from 2,392 in 1999. This was the 95th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 2000▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Burkina Faso | 123 | 2.1% |
| 2nd | Niger | 128 | -37.1% |
| 3rd | Bangladesh | 136 | 0.8% |
| 4th | Congo, Republic of | 226 | -4.3% |
| 5th | Senegal | 241 | 3.8% |
| 6th | Chad | 242 | -2.6% |
| 7th | Yemen, Republic of | 242 | 2.9% |
| 8th | Madagascar | 256 | -0.1% |
| 9th | Cambodia | 273 | 0.6% |
| 10th | Nigeria | 274 | 0.6% |
| 11th | Benin | 275 | -16.3% |
| 12th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 275 | -2.9% |
| 13th | Myanmar | 284 | 2.0% |
| 14th | Lao PDR | 297 | - |
| 15th | Eritrea | 315 | -0.6% |
| 16th | Ghana | 322 | -19.7% |
| 17th | Nepal | 330 | 3.8% |
| 18th | Tajikistan | 342 | -5.2% |
| 19th | Equatorial Guinea | 343 | 15.2% |
| 20th | Haiti | 368 | 3.5% |
| 21st | Viet Nam | 372 | 4.0% |
| 22nd | Côte d'Ivoire | 384 | -6.0% |
| 23rd | Uganda | 387 | -0.8% |
| 24th | Morocco | 388 | -0.9% |
| 25th | Tanzania | 394 | 2.7% |
| 26th | India | 395 | 0.5% |
| 27th | Mozambique | 396 | 3.2% |
| 28th | Rwanda | 406 | -21.1% |
| 29th | Togo | 411 | -2.9% |
| 30th | Pakistan | 412 | 0.2% |
| 31st | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 424 | -20.9% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 426 | 1.5% |
| 33rd | Angola | 428 | -1.4% |
| 34th | Sri Lanka | 432 | 8.1% |
| 35th | Honduras | 456 | -3.0% |
| 36th | Kenya | 460 | 0.9% |
| 37th | Kyrgyz Republic | 473 | -5.0% |
| 38th | Sudan | 487 | -6.0% |
| 39th | Philippines | 487 | 0.9% |
| 40th | Nicaragua | 500 | 1.0% |
| 41st | Peru | 506 | -1.3% |
| 42nd | El Salvador | 537 | -16.2% |
| 43rd | Zimbabwe | 556 | -38.1% |
| 44th | Egypt, Arab Republic of | 570 | -7.2% |
| 45th | Namibia | 576 | -1.0% |
| 46th | Albania | 581 | 0.8% |
| 47th | Indonesia | 586 | -0.2% |
| 48th | Zambia | 596 | -5.3% |
| 49th | Guatemala | 616 | 2.5% |
| 50th | Armenia | 626 | 8.0% |
| 51st | Ecuador | 639 | 0.1% |
| 52nd | Colombia | 668 | -1.3% |
| 53rd | Georgia | 704 | 5.1% |
| 54th | Costa Rica | 730 | 7.2% |
| 55th | Tunisia | 748 | 2.5% |
| 56th | Paraguay | 757 | -8.2% |
| 57th | Panama | 791 | -7.4% |
| 58th | Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of | 833 | 6.3% |
| 59th | Mauritius | 851 | 9.7% |
| 60th | Dominican Republic | 856 | 7.4% |
| 61st | Kosovo | 857 | - |
| 62nd | Algeria | 874 | 0.2% |
| 63rd | China | 898 | 2.0% |
| 64th | Jordan | 903 | 2.5% |
| 65th | Eswatini | 914 | -5.6% |
| 66th | Syrian Arab Republic | 928 | -2.1% |
| 67th | Uruguay | 949 | -4.7% |
| 68th | Mongolia | 979 | 5.0% |
| 69th | Moldova | 986 | -7.3% |
| 70th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1,045 | 30.2% |
| 71st | Botswana | 1,070 | 1.8% |
| 72nd | Brazil | 1,081 | -0.9% |
| 73rd | Iraq | 1,091 | 13.7% |
| 74th | Lebanon | 1,137 | -10.7% |
| 75th | Cuba | 1,147 | 6.8% |
| 76th | Thailand | 1,153 | 1.2% |
| 77th | Gabon | 1,153 | -2.1% |
| 78th | Türkiye | 1,166 | 8.0% |
| 79th | Suriname | 1,280 | - |
| 80th | North Macedonia | 1,317 | -2.0% |
| 81st | Jamaica | 1,339 | 2.3% |
| 82nd | Azerbaijan | 1,404 | 2.5% |
| 83rd | Mexico | 1,541 | -0.9% |
| 84th | Romania | 1,615 | 0.1% |
| 85th | Latvia | 1,619 | -2.7% |
| 86th | Chile | 1,623 | -0.6% |
| 87th | Argentina | 1,643 | -1.4% |
| 88th | Malta | 1,732 | -10.9% |
| 89th | Serbia | 1,801 | 8.7% |
| 90th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1,852 | -4.0% |
| 91st | Uzbekistan | 1,867 | 1.5% |
| 92nd | Croatia | 1,883 | -2.7% |
| 93rd | Lithuania | 2,041 | -9.8% |
| 94th | Malaysia | 2,102 | 11.6% |
| 95th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 2,121 | -11.3% |
| 96th | Cyprus | 2,265 | 5.7% |
| 97th | South Africa | 2,269 | -4.1% |
| 98th | Bulgaria | 2,277 | 2.1% |
| 99th | Kazakhstan | 2,302 | -1.0% |
| 100th | Poland | 2,322 | -3.1% |
| 101st | Portugal | 2,390 | 0.0% |
| 102nd | Hungary | 2,448 | -1.7% |
| 103rd | Belarus | 2,472 | 2.1% |
| 104th | Greece | 2,512 | 5.0% |
| 105th | Ukraine | 2,700 | -0.1% |
| 106th | Israel | 2,899 | 5.9% |
| 107th | Libya | 2,977 | 4.3% |
| 108th | Spain | 2,991 | 3.9% |
| 109th | Italy | 3,012 | 1.9% |
| 110th | Turkmenistan | 3,248 | -1.7% |
| 111th | Slovenia | 3,281 | 1.2% |
| 112th | Oman | 3,286 | 5.1% |
| 113th | Slovak Republic | 3,293 | 0.6% |
| 114th | Estonia | 3,378 | -4.7% |
| 115th | European Union | 3,427 | 0.5% |
| 116th | Switzerland | 3,467 | -1.9% |
| 117th | Denmark | 3,491 | -3.1% |
| 118th | Austria | 3,571 | -0.6% |
| 119th | Ireland | 3,627 | 2.3% |
| 120th | United Kingdom | 3,786 | 0.1% |
| 121st | Korea | 3,952 | 7.8% |
| 122nd | Czechia | 4,022 | 5.6% |
| 123rd | Japan | 4,067 | 1.8% |
| 124th | Germany | 4,094 | 0.3% |
| 125th | France | 4,130 | 0.3% |
| 126th | Russian Federation | 4,225 | 2.1% |
| 127th | New Zealand | 4,467 | 3.2% |
| 128th | Gibraltar | 4,613 | 4.8% |
| 129th | Singapore | 4,635 | 1.0% |
| 130th | Netherlands | 4,695 | 0.2% |
| 131st | Sweden | 5,376 | -5.3% |
| 132nd | Belgium | 5,663 | 0.9% |
| 133rd | Australia | 5,681 | 0.6% |
| 134th | Norway | 5,826 | -1.5% |
| 135th | Finland | 6,257 | -0.4% |
| 136th | Saudi Arabia | 6,516 | 7.6% |
| 137th | Brunei Darussalam | 7,307 | -1.6% |
| 138th | Trinidad and Tobago | 7,576 | 7.2% |
| 139th | Luxembourg | 7,682 | 5.7% |
| 140th | United States | 8,055 | 1.7% |
| 141st | Canada | 8,225 | 1.3% |
| 142nd | United Arab Emirates | 8,957 | -9.0% |
| 143rd | Kuwait | 9,494 | 1.0% |
| 144th | Iceland | 11,405 | 10.2% |
| 145th | Bahrain | 12,833 | 2.0% |
| 146th | Curaçao | 15,737 | 7.0% |
| 147th | Qatar | 16,939 | -8.4% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita in 2000 was 2,121. This ranked 95th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita change in 2000?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita decreased by 11.3% in 2000 compared to 1999.
Which country had the highest energy use per capita in 2000?▾
Qatar had the highest energy use per capita in 2000 at 16,939.
What is the energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2000?▾
The energy use per capita of Hong Kong SAR, China in 2000 was 2,121. This ranked 95th globally.
How does 2000 compare to 1999 for Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's energy use per capita went from 2,392 in 1999 to 2,121 in 2000, a 11.3% decrease.
HistorySaid - pattern alert
Hong Kong SAR, China matched the Export Boom Cycle pattern in 2000. Historically: 768 occurrences, 546 successful (71%). View full analysis →
Related
1999
2001
All years
Full ranking 2000
CO2 Emissions
CO2 per Capita
Renewable Energy
Electricity Access
Forest Area
Peak: 1999
Lowest: 2025
Energy Use per Capita 1990s
Energy Use per Capita 2000s
Energy Use per Capita 2010s
Energy Use per Capita 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking