Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1994
106.05
+20.77 from 1993
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 106.05 in 1994, increased +20.77 from 100.83 in 1993. This was the 68th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1994▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Georgia | 33.00 | - |
| 2nd | Armenia | 33.46 | - |
| 3rd | Lithuania | 40.68 | - |
| 4th | Bulgaria | 45.82 | -11.6% |
| 5th | Estonia | 46.42 | - |
| 6th | Slovak Republic | 48.00 | 0.9% |
| 7th | Russian Federation | 48.85 | - |
| 8th | Zambia | 51.24 | -4.0% |
| 9th | Czechia | 55.22 | 5.8% |
| 10th | Equatorial Guinea | 57.11 | -28.1% |
| 11th | Romania | 62.97 | 10.0% |
| 12th | Poland | 67.11 | 2.1% |
| 13th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 67.33 | 23.3% |
| 14th | Latvia | 67.63 | 12.4% |
| 15th | Hungary | 69.12 | -0.3% |
| 16th | Trinidad and Tobago | 69.65 | -6.8% |
| 17th | United Arab Emirates | 69.79 | - |
| 18th | China | 70.55 | -21.6% |
| 19th | Australia | 75.22 | -4.6% |
| 20th | Moldova | 76.26 | - |
| 21st | Côte d'Ivoire | 76.96 | -38.0% |
| 22nd | Togo | 78.97 | -30.6% |
| 23rd | Central African Republic | 83.17 | -37.4% |
| 24th | Canada | 83.56 | -22.7% |
| 25th | Samoa | 83.73 | 7.2% |
| 26th | Greece | 87.61 | -5.0% |
| 27th | Costa Rica | 87.67 | -0.8% |
| 28th | Malta | 87.86 | 1.7% |
| 29th | New Zealand | 87.97 | 12.3% |
| 30th | Guyana | 88.13 | -43.5% |
| 31st | Ghana | 89.73 | -19.0% |
| 32nd | Cameroon | 90.26 | -35.3% |
| 33rd | Slovenia | 90.92 | - |
| 34th | Spain | 91.13 | -4.0% |
| 35th | Norway | 91.39 | -19.5% |
| 36th | Colombia | 92.08 | 12.6% |
| 37th | Brazil | 92.74 | 4.4% |
| 38th | India | 92.89 | - |
| 39th | Portugal | 93.54 | -1.1% |
| 40th | Cyprus | 93.60 | 2.5% |
| 41st | Dominican Republic | 94.05 | 4.8% |
| 42nd | St. Kitts and Nevis | 94.06 | -0.9% |
| 43rd | Peru | 95.30 | - |
| 44th | Türkiye | 95.47 | - |
| 45th | Denmark | 95.56 | 1.0% |
| 46th | Italy | 95.69 | -1.7% |
| 47th | Croatia | 95.77 | - |
| 48th | Solomon Islands | 95.78 | 3.8% |
| 49th | Ireland | 95.86 | -1.1% |
| 50th | Thailand | 97.49 | - |
| 51st | Chile | 98.43 | 3.5% |
| 52nd | Gabon | 98.97 | -32.5% |
| 53rd | Uruguay | 99.00 | 9.1% |
| 54th | Serbia | 99.20 | - |
| 55th | Switzerland | 100.14 | 16.7% |
| 56th | Nigeria | 100.63 | 84.8% |
| 57th | Netherlands | 101.03 | 8.0% |
| 58th | Luxembourg | 102.15 | 0.9% |
| 59th | Singapore | 102.51 | 17.7% |
| 60th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 102.61 | -4.6% |
| 61st | Paraguay | 103.23 | 5.4% |
| 62nd | Belgium | 104.15 | 9.3% |
| 63rd | United States | 104.19 | 33.3% |
| 64th | Israel | 104.27 | 1.0% |
| 65th | Belize | 104.65 | -0.3% |
| 66th | St. Lucia | 104.79 | -0.3% |
| 67th | Morocco | 105.93 | 3.2% |
| 68th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 106.05 | 24.4% |
| 69th | Finland | 106.49 | 15.4% |
| 70th | Austria | 106.84 | 11.9% |
| 71st | Philippines | 107.14 | 8.4% |
| 72nd | France | 108.17 | -0.7% |
| 73rd | United Kingdom | 108.70 | 1.5% |
| 74th | Grenada | 110.06 | 0.0% |
| 75th | Papua New Guinea | 110.65 | -4.9% |
| 76th | Mexico | 112.40 | -22.4% |
| 77th | Bahamas, The | 113.54 | -3.9% |
| 78th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 115.25 | - |
| 79th | Indonesia | 115.46 | - |
| 80th | Germany | 116.02 | 6.3% |
| 81st | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 116.22 | -2.8% |
| 82nd | Antigua and Barbuda | 117.04 | -15.8% |
| 83rd | Sweden | 118.64 | -9.2% |
| 84th | Saudi Arabia | 118.96 | -3.5% |
| 85th | Pakistan | 119.22 | -0.7% |
| 86th | Malaysia | 120.23 | -3.2% |
| 87th | Nicaragua | 120.96 | -7.3% |
| 88th | Burundi | 123.40 | 3.7% |
| 89th | North Macedonia | 124.02 | 4.1% |
| 90th | Iceland | 125.51 | -6.0% |
| 91st | Bahrain | 125.98 | -3.5% |
| 92nd | South Africa | 126.03 | -4.3% |
| 93rd | Fiji | 126.48 | 0.3% |
| 94th | Dominica | 127.42 | -3.3% |
| 95th | Tunisia | 129.13 | 0.8% |
| 96th | Malawi | 131.40 | -29.1% |
| 97th | Japan | 133.21 | -10.8% |
| 98th | Sierra Leone | 135.80 | 15.5% |
| 99th | Korea | 136.29 | 36.3% |
| 100th | Algeria | 139.98 | -13.7% |
| 101st | Uganda | 148.57 | 25.2% |
| 102nd | Ukraine | 167.48 | 71.1% |
| 103rd | Lesotho | 197.15 | -4.6% |
| 104th | Gambia, The | 201.27 | -5.3% |
| 105th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 304.95 | -10.1% |
| 106th | Argentina | 443.37 | - |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1994?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1994 was 106.05. This ranked 68th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1994?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 24.4% in 1994 compared to 1993.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1994?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1994 at 443.37.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1994?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1994 was 106.05. This ranked 68th globally.
How does 1994 compare to 1993 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 100.83 in 1993 to 106.05 in 1994, a 24.4% increase.
Related
1993
1995
All years
Full ranking 1994
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking