Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1995
108.69
+9.29 from 1994
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 108.69 in 1995, increased +9.29 from 106.05 in 1994. This was the 69th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1995▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Lithuania | 47.45 | 16.6% |
| 2nd | Zambia | 49.18 | -4.0% |
| 3rd | Slovak Republic | 49.34 | 3.1% |
| 4th | Armenia | 52.00 | 55.4% |
| 5th | Bulgaria | 53.92 | 24.2% |
| 6th | Estonia | 57.00 | 22.8% |
| 7th | Czechia | 57.00 | 5.4% |
| 8th | Russian Federation | 60.26 | -0.5% |
| 9th | Romania | 61.44 | -2.7% |
| 10th | Hungary | 66.35 | -19.7% |
| 11th | United Arab Emirates | 66.60 | -4.6% |
| 12th | Equatorial Guinea | 68.04 | 19.1% |
| 13th | Trinidad and Tobago | 68.07 | -2.3% |
| 14th | Latvia | 70.29 | 18.0% |
| 15th | Georgia | 71.42 | 116.4% |
| 16th | Moldova | 72.23 | -5.3% |
| 17th | Poland | 72.54 | -2.3% |
| 18th | Australia | 73.53 | -17.9% |
| 19th | Mexico | 75.53 | -47.0% |
| 20th | Samoa | 76.24 | -8.9% |
| 21st | China | 78.64 | 41.3% |
| 22nd | Canada | 80.83 | -21.0% |
| 23rd | Côte d'Ivoire | 88.51 | 15.0% |
| 24th | Italy | 89.26 | -11.9% |
| 25th | Malta | 89.32 | -0.2% |
| 26th | Costa Rica | 89.40 | 2.0% |
| 27th | Guyana | 89.75 | 1.8% |
| 28th | India | 90.35 | -2.7% |
| 29th | Greece | 90.46 | -8.8% |
| 30th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 90.61 | 34.6% |
| 31st | St. Kitts and Nevis | 92.07 | -2.1% |
| 32nd | Spain | 92.77 | -1.7% |
| 33rd | New Zealand | 93.18 | 5.8% |
| 34th | Solomon Islands | 93.60 | -2.3% |
| 35th | Colombia | 93.70 | -15.8% |
| 36th | Papua New Guinea | 93.94 | -15.1% |
| 37th | Norway | 94.10 | -20.5% |
| 38th | Cyprus | 94.72 | -6.1% |
| 39th | Thailand | 95.87 | -1.7% |
| 40th | Peru | 96.01 | 0.7% |
| 41st | Ukraine | 96.21 | -42.6% |
| 42nd | Portugal | 96.42 | 1.2% |
| 43rd | Ireland | 96.68 | -3.3% |
| 44th | Cameroon | 96.98 | 7.5% |
| 45th | Central African Republic | 98.29 | 18.2% |
| 46th | Croatia | 98.60 | 3.0% |
| 47th | Dominican Republic | 98.90 | 5.2% |
| 48th | Slovenia | 99.42 | 9.4% |
| 49th | Denmark | 99.66 | 5.5% |
| 50th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 99.85 | -2.7% |
| 51st | United States | 100.74 | 16.4% |
| 52nd | Brazil | 101.50 | -27.3% |
| 53rd | Uruguay | 102.47 | 3.5% |
| 54th | Belize | 102.63 | -1.9% |
| 55th | St. Lucia | 103.79 | -1.0% |
| 56th | Ghana | 103.97 | 15.9% |
| 57th | Luxembourg | 104.06 | 4.7% |
| 58th | United Kingdom | 104.07 | -7.4% |
| 59th | Singapore | 104.26 | 8.2% |
| 60th | Paraguay | 104.32 | 1.1% |
| 61st | Chile | 104.37 | -6.1% |
| 62nd | Israel | 105.07 | 15.5% |
| 63rd | Türkiye | 105.25 | 10.2% |
| 64th | Netherlands | 105.37 | 5.6% |
| 65th | Grenada | 106.44 | -3.3% |
| 66th | Switzerland | 106.72 | 13.1% |
| 67th | Bahamas, The | 106.90 | -5.9% |
| 68th | Belgium | 107.97 | 6.9% |
| 69th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 108.69 | 9.3% |
| 70th | Philippines | 108.81 | 23.2% |
| 71st | Togo | 109.01 | 38.0% |
| 72nd | Morocco | 109.37 | 6.5% |
| 73rd | Gabon | 109.40 | 10.5% |
| 74th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 110.00 | -5.4% |
| 75th | Nicaragua | 110.36 | -8.8% |
| 76th | Austria | 110.91 | 6.6% |
| 77th | France | 111.14 | -2.8% |
| 78th | Indonesia | 111.96 | -3.0% |
| 79th | Antigua and Barbuda | 113.43 | -3.1% |
| 80th | Malawi | 115.26 | -12.3% |
| 81st | Saudi Arabia | 115.29 | 17.7% |
| 82nd | Finland | 115.97 | 6.0% |
| 83rd | Algeria | 117.35 | -23.6% |
| 84th | Sweden | 118.44 | -12.8% |
| 85th | Pakistan | 118.53 | -0.6% |
| 86th | Dominica | 120.10 | -5.7% |
| 87th | Bahrain | 120.14 | -4.6% |
| 88th | Malaysia | 120.46 | -11.3% |
| 89th | Germany | 121.25 | 1.3% |
| 90th | South Africa | 122.61 | -25.8% |
| 91st | Sierra Leone | 122.68 | -9.7% |
| 92nd | Fiji | 124.16 | -1.8% |
| 93rd | Iceland | 125.21 | 21.4% |
| 94th | Burundi | 130.36 | 5.6% |
| 95th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 130.58 | 13.3% |
| 96th | Tunisia | 131.80 | 2.1% |
| 97th | Japan | 135.40 | -21.4% |
| 98th | North Macedonia | 136.46 | 21.1% |
| 99th | Uganda | 145.27 | -2.2% |
| 100th | Korea | 152.76 | 33.2% |
| 101st | Serbia | 158.04 | 59.3% |
| 102nd | Nigeria | 160.17 | 59.2% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 195.20 | -3.0% |
| 104th | Lesotho | 197.52 | 0.2% |
| 105th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 236.90 | -22.3% |
| 106th | Argentina | 415.67 | -6.2% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1995?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1995 was 108.69. This ranked 69th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1995?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 9.3% in 1995 compared to 1994.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1995?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1995 at 415.67.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1995?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1995 was 108.69. This ranked 69th globally.
How does 1995 compare to 1994 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 106.05 in 1994 to 108.69 in 1995, a 9.3% increase.
Related
1994
1996
All years
Full ranking 1995
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking