Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1997
135.65
+30.62 from 1996
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 135.65 in 1997, increased +30.62 from 121.30 in 1996. This was the 94th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1997▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Slovak Republic | 52.91 | 7.0% |
| 2nd | Bulgaria | 56.79 | 31.2% |
| 3rd | Czechia | 61.58 | 1.9% |
| 4th | Zambia | 62.18 | 15.8% |
| 5th | Equatorial Guinea | 62.83 | -7.6% |
| 6th | Romania | 65.29 | 18.5% |
| 7th | Lithuania | 65.31 | 16.7% |
| 8th | Trinidad and Tobago | 67.27 | -2.1% |
| 9th | Estonia | 67.39 | 4.3% |
| 10th | Armenia | 69.87 | -1.4% |
| 11th | Hungary | 71.40 | -9.8% |
| 12th | United Arab Emirates | 74.48 | 7.8% |
| 13th | Latvia | 76.10 | 11.5% |
| 14th | Russian Federation | 79.49 | -22.8% |
| 15th | Australia | 79.97 | -16.2% |
| 16th | Canada | 80.89 | -19.2% |
| 17th | Poland | 80.92 | -5.1% |
| 18th | Samoa | 83.68 | 6.5% |
| 19th | Moldova | 84.79 | 15.4% |
| 20th | Côte d'Ivoire | 86.64 | -2.2% |
| 21st | Malta | 89.90 | 0.2% |
| 22nd | Spain | 90.49 | -6.8% |
| 23rd | Costa Rica | 90.67 | 1.3% |
| 24th | India | 90.98 | 6.2% |
| 25th | Ireland | 91.69 | -10.5% |
| 26th | Cyprus | 92.22 | -6.5% |
| 27th | Croatia | 92.56 | -4.8% |
| 28th | China | 93.00 | 35.6% |
| 29th | Georgia | 93.99 | 4.6% |
| 30th | Greece | 94.12 | -10.4% |
| 31st | Norway | 94.21 | -21.6% |
| 32nd | Togo | 94.27 | 0.8% |
| 33rd | Thailand | 94.89 | -7.1% |
| 34th | Slovenia | 95.31 | 0.8% |
| 35th | Switzerland | 95.36 | -1.5% |
| 36th | Denmark | 95.53 | -2.0% |
| 37th | Portugal | 95.56 | -3.1% |
| 38th | Luxembourg | 96.40 | -2.7% |
| 39th | Central African Republic | 96.51 | -3.5% |
| 40th | Cameroon | 97.02 | -1.0% |
| 41st | Netherlands | 97.08 | -3.5% |
| 42nd | Mexico | 97.61 | -9.3% |
| 43rd | Peru | 98.72 | 1.5% |
| 44th | Guyana | 98.77 | 2.7% |
| 45th | Italy | 98.78 | -4.6% |
| 46th | Belgium | 98.93 | -2.2% |
| 47th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 99.62 | 8.1% |
| 48th | Papua New Guinea | 101.06 | 0.5% |
| 49th | New Zealand | 101.33 | 1.3% |
| 50th | St. Lucia | 102.37 | -0.7% |
| 51st | Dominican Republic | 102.50 | -0.1% |
| 52nd | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 103.67 | -2.3% |
| 53rd | Austria | 103.68 | 0.2% |
| 54th | Nicaragua | 105.19 | -2.3% |
| 55th | France | 105.24 | -8.9% |
| 56th | Colombia | 105.55 | -13.0% |
| 57th | Finland | 105.76 | -4.0% |
| 58th | Gabon | 106.25 | -1.7% |
| 59th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 106.74 | 2.2% |
| 60th | Japan | 106.98 | -26.7% |
| 61st | Uruguay | 107.14 | 3.5% |
| 62nd | Grenada | 107.84 | 1.0% |
| 63rd | Belize | 108.33 | 1.4% |
| 64th | Solomon Islands | 108.47 | 9.0% |
| 65th | Singapore | 108.54 | 8.1% |
| 66th | United States | 108.87 | 25.2% |
| 67th | Morocco | 109.34 | 2.8% |
| 68th | North Macedonia | 109.84 | -11.3% |
| 69th | Brazil | 109.84 | -32.4% |
| 70th | Germany | 110.21 | -7.2% |
| 71st | Paraguay | 111.68 | 2.8% |
| 72nd | Bahamas, The | 111.72 | 4.2% |
| 73rd | Indonesia | 111.82 | -6.1% |
| 74th | Türkiye | 113.12 | 5.5% |
| 75th | Serbia | 114.25 | 15.7% |
| 76th | Philippines | 114.42 | 17.4% |
| 77th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 114.67 | 1.0% |
| 78th | Chile | 114.75 | -5.1% |
| 79th | Israel | 115.35 | 19.6% |
| 80th | Antigua and Barbuda | 115.39 | 0.0% |
| 81st | Pakistan | 116.96 | 1.4% |
| 82nd | South Africa | 119.24 | -19.0% |
| 83rd | Dominica | 119.80 | 0.5% |
| 84th | Ghana | 120.24 | 6.7% |
| 85th | Malaysia | 120.69 | -15.5% |
| 86th | Sweden | 120.90 | -16.8% |
| 87th | Saudi Arabia | 122.73 | 27.7% |
| 88th | United Kingdom | 123.34 | 12.8% |
| 89th | Bahrain | 127.32 | 6.6% |
| 90th | Iceland | 127.62 | 26.2% |
| 91st | Fiji | 128.46 | 3.1% |
| 92nd | Algeria | 129.08 | -1.8% |
| 93rd | Tunisia | 131.38 | -0.5% |
| 94th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 135.65 | 29.2% |
| 95th | Ukraine | 136.51 | 17.9% |
| 96th | Sierra Leone | 141.00 | 14.4% |
| 97th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 146.03 | 24.5% |
| 98th | Korea | 146.65 | 24.5% |
| 99th | Uganda | 152.48 | 4.8% |
| 100th | Burundi | 158.93 | 18.3% |
| 101st | Malawi | 173.12 | 4.1% |
| 102nd | Lesotho | 179.04 | 0.2% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 197.69 | 3.2% |
| 104th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 223.31 | -4.6% |
| 105th | Nigeria | 236.02 | 13.7% |
| 106th | Argentina | 419.67 | 3.0% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1997?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1997 was 135.65. This ranked 94th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1997?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 29.2% in 1997 compared to 1996.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1997?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1997 at 419.67.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1997?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1997 was 135.65. This ranked 94th globally.
How does 1997 compare to 1996 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 121.30 in 1996 to 135.65 in 1997, a 29.2% increase.
Related
1996
1998
All years
Full ranking 1997
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking