Hong Kong SAR, China - Real Effective Exchange Rate 1996
121.30
+22.49 from 1995
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate was 121.30 in 1996, increased +22.49 from 108.69 in 1995. This was the 90th highest globally.
Global Ranking - 1996▾
| Rank | Country | Value | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st | Bulgaria | 46.24 | -6.3% |
| 2nd | Slovak Republic | 50.04 | 1.8% |
| 3rd | Zambia | 53.69 | 9.2% |
| 4th | Romania | 55.29 | -9.0% |
| 5th | Lithuania | 55.96 | 17.9% |
| 6th | Czechia | 60.66 | 6.5% |
| 7th | Estonia | 64.60 | 13.3% |
| 8th | Hungary | 67.97 | -13.3% |
| 9th | Equatorial Guinea | 68.00 | -0.1% |
| 10th | Trinidad and Tobago | 68.75 | 1.0% |
| 11th | United Arab Emirates | 69.09 | 3.7% |
| 12th | Latvia | 69.86 | 6.8% |
| 13th | Armenia | 70.87 | 36.3% |
| 14th | Moldova | 73.51 | 1.8% |
| 15th | Russian Federation | 74.39 | -4.2% |
| 16th | Poland | 78.59 | -1.1% |
| 17th | Samoa | 78.60 | 3.1% |
| 18th | Australia | 80.38 | -8.0% |
| 19th | Canada | 81.67 | -18.2% |
| 20th | Mexico | 84.78 | -11.9% |
| 21st | India | 85.65 | -5.2% |
| 22nd | China | 86.36 | 39.2% |
| 23rd | Côte d'Ivoire | 88.57 | 0.1% |
| 24th | Malta | 88.89 | -2.6% |
| 25th | Costa Rica | 89.55 | 0.2% |
| 26th | Georgia | 89.89 | 25.8% |
| 27th | St. Kitts and Nevis | 92.16 | 0.1% |
| 28th | Togo | 93.56 | -14.2% |
| 29th | Norway | 93.57 | -23.1% |
| 30th | Cyprus | 93.79 | -6.0% |
| 31st | Greece | 94.42 | -7.0% |
| 32nd | Slovenia | 94.56 | -4.9% |
| 33rd | Spain | 94.66 | -1.0% |
| 34th | Guyana | 96.20 | 7.2% |
| 35th | Portugal | 97.21 | -1.3% |
| 36th | Croatia | 97.24 | -1.4% |
| 37th | Peru | 97.28 | 1.3% |
| 38th | Cameroon | 98.01 | 1.1% |
| 39th | Denmark | 98.69 | 0.0% |
| 40th | Serbia | 98.71 | -37.5% |
| 41st | Ireland | 99.04 | -1.8% |
| 42nd | New Zealand | 99.25 | 5.8% |
| 43rd | Italy | 99.27 | 5.8% |
| 44th | Colombia | 99.29 | -13.9% |
| 45th | Solomon Islands | 99.52 | 6.3% |
| 46th | Central African Republic | 100.05 | 1.8% |
| 47th | Papua New Guinea | 100.54 | 7.0% |
| 48th | Luxembourg | 100.88 | -0.8% |
| 49th | Thailand | 102.13 | 6.5% |
| 50th | Dominican Republic | 102.60 | 3.7% |
| 51st | Netherlands | 102.81 | -0.5% |
| 52nd | St. Lucia | 103.10 | -0.7% |
| 53rd | Uruguay | 103.54 | 1.0% |
| 54th | Switzerland | 103.55 | 3.3% |
| 55th | United States | 103.75 | 22.3% |
| 56th | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 104.45 | 4.6% |
| 57th | Belgium | 105.23 | 1.1% |
| 58th | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 106.09 | -18.8% |
| 59th | United Kingdom | 106.46 | -0.9% |
| 60th | Belize | 106.81 | 4.1% |
| 61st | Grenada | 106.81 | 0.3% |
| 62nd | Chile | 106.92 | -9.7% |
| 63rd | Brazil | 107.07 | -30.5% |
| 64th | Singapore | 107.21 | 9.6% |
| 65th | Bahamas, The | 107.23 | 0.3% |
| 66th | Türkiye | 107.26 | 1.9% |
| 67th | Nicaragua | 107.70 | -2.4% |
| 68th | Gabon | 108.06 | -1.2% |
| 69th | Austria | 108.34 | 1.6% |
| 70th | Paraguay | 108.60 | 4.1% |
| 71st | Morocco | 109.72 | 4.3% |
| 72nd | Israel | 110.27 | 20.2% |
| 73rd | France | 110.62 | -5.2% |
| 74th | Finland | 110.68 | -5.6% |
| 75th | Ghana | 112.66 | 8.4% |
| 76th | South Africa | 112.80 | -29.8% |
| 77th | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 113.56 | 3.2% |
| 78th | Japan | 113.71 | -34.7% |
| 79th | Pakistan | 115.31 | -2.7% |
| 80th | Antigua and Barbuda | 115.40 | 1.7% |
| 81st | Ukraine | 115.74 | 20.3% |
| 82nd | Philippines | 116.01 | 28.9% |
| 83rd | Germany | 116.84 | -5.8% |
| 84th | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 117.31 | 29.5% |
| 85th | Saudi Arabia | 117.44 | 24.1% |
| 86th | Indonesia | 119.09 | 6.4% |
| 87th | Dominica | 119.24 | -0.7% |
| 88th | Bahrain | 119.45 | -0.6% |
| 89th | Algeria | 119.57 | -6.0% |
| 90th | Hong Kong SAR, China | 121.30 | 22.8% |
| 91st | Sierra Leone | 123.25 | 0.5% |
| 92nd | Fiji | 124.57 | 0.3% |
| 93rd | Malaysia | 124.89 | -8.4% |
| 94th | Iceland | 125.40 | 23.0% |
| 95th | North Macedonia | 126.10 | -4.0% |
| 96th | Sweden | 127.87 | -5.7% |
| 97th | Tunisia | 131.99 | 0.1% |
| 98th | Burundi | 134.33 | 3.0% |
| 99th | Uganda | 145.50 | 0.2% |
| 100th | Korea | 164.43 | 42.5% |
| 101st | Malawi | 166.29 | 44.3% |
| 102nd | Lesotho | 178.74 | -9.5% |
| 103rd | Gambia, The | 191.63 | -1.8% |
| 104th | Nigeria | 207.50 | 29.6% |
| 105th | Congo, Democratic Republic of | 234.12 | -1.2% |
| 106th | Argentina | 407.58 | -1.9% |
FAQ
What was Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1996?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate in 1996 was 121.30. This ranked 90th globally.
How did Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate change in 1996?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate increased by 22.8% in 1996 compared to 1995.
Which country had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1996?▾
Argentina had the highest real effective exchange rate in 1996 at 407.58.
What is the real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1996?▾
The real effective exchange rate of Hong Kong SAR, China in 1996 was 121.30. This ranked 90th globally.
How does 1996 compare to 1995 for Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate?▾
Hong Kong SAR, China's real effective exchange rate went from 108.69 in 1995 to 121.30 in 1996, a 22.8% increase.
Related
1995
1997
All years
Full ranking 1996
Exchange Rate
Foreign Reserves
Reserves in Months of Imports
Peak: 1998
Lowest: 1988
Real Effective Exchange Rate 1990s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2000s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2010s
Real Effective Exchange Rate 2020s
Highest ever
Lowest ever
Average
vs United Kingdom
vs Finland
vs Greenland
vs Canada
Global Ranking